Outcomes of Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear Treatment.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair with superior capsular augmentation with LHBBT, Arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair, Arthroscopic complete rotator cuff repair, Suture anchor(s).
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Rotator Cuff Tears, Rotator Cuff Syndrome. Basic parameters: 50 years — 80 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Outcomes of Different Treatment Modalities for Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear.
Overview
Rotator cuff tear is the leading cause of shoulder pain in the elderly. There isn't enough evidence nor clinical guidelines to guide the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears, specially irreparable tears. Arthroscopic partial repair has been widely used and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), either with allograft, autograft or augmentation with long head biceps brachii tendon (LHBBT), has been recently added. It is showing promising results, but lacking high quality evidence. This is a prospective clinical study to compare the outcomes of different surgical methods for massive rotator cuff tendon tears. Minimal follow-up time will be two years. In this trial, massive rotator cuff tears will be anatomically repaired if possible. For irreparable tears a method will be randomly assigned intra-operatively once a tear is determined to be irreparable - either partial repair or partial repair with superior capsular reconstruction using the long head biceps brachii (LHBB) tendon. Patients who are eligible for the study but refuse operative treatment, will serve as conservative study group. The hypothesis is that massive rotator cuff tears that are reparable will have the best functional outcomes. For irreparable tears, augmentation with LHBBT will give superior results over partial repair.
Detailed description
Patients with massive rotator cuff tendon tears aged between 50 to 80 years will be included in the study following the eligibility criteria. Massive tear is defined as grade III tear according to Davidson and Burkhart classification (2010), supraspinatus (SSP) tendon retraction described by Patte (1990) classification.
The study is conducted in Tartu University Hospital Sports Traumatology Centre and rotator cuff repair procedures will be done by three orthopaedic surgeons with long experience in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
It is determined intra-operatively whether the tear is reparable or not. If possible, the tendon(s) will be anatomically repaired. For irreparable tears intra-operative urn randomization takes place - either partial repair or partial repair with SCR using the LHBB tendon. Surgical techniques will be standardized. Patients who refuse operative treatment, will be followed as conservative treatment group.
The primary objective of the study is the functional status of the included subjects in different treatment groups. The secondary objective of the study is to confirm whether the tendons are intact on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after operation using Sugaya classification (2007).
The post-operative therapy regimen will be the same for each study group. Subjects will come for scheduled visits at 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month timepoints. Assessment tools consist of range of motion (ROM), strength measurements, preoperative radiography measuring acromio-humeral index (AHI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromion type and shoulder arthrosis (Hamada), functional scores: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), The Constant-Murley score (CMS), The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and visual analogue scale (VAS), also including Tampa kinesiophobia score and emotional well-being (EEK) score. Goutallier classification (1994) will be used pre- and postoperatively to measure muscle fatty infiltration.
Interventions
- Procedure Arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair with superior capsular augmentation with LHBBT
Residual rotator cuff defect will be reconstructed using LHBBT. - Procedure Arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair
Rotator cuff will be repaired with remaining residual defect. - Procedure Arthroscopic complete rotator cuff repair
Arthroscopic complete repair as a standard procedure. - Device Suture anchor(s)
Arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon(s) repair using suture anchor(s).
Primary outcome measures
- Change in shoulder strength [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
- Change in shoulder range of motion. [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
- Functional outcome according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
- Functional outcome according to the Constant-Murley score (CMS). [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
- Functional outcome according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
- Change in pain score [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- Integrity of surgically repaired rotator cuff tendons on MRI studies using Sugaya classification (2005). [Time frame: postoperatively 6 months, 12 months and 24 months]
- Change in quality of life [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
- Change in kinesiophobia score [Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Massive rotator cuff tendon tear: grade III according to Davidson and Burkhart 2010 classification, diagnosed on MRI, and LHBB tendon is intact.
- Primary rotator cuff pathology AND
- Symptoms have not lasted more than 6 months.
- In case of trauma, traumatic event no more than 6 months ago.
- Aged between 50 and 80 at the time of enrollment.
- Subject is able and willing to give informed consent AND
- Subject is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the post-operative rehabilitation protocol, questionnaires, and scheduled clinical and radiographic visits.
Exclusion criteria
- Previous rotator cuff surgery of the index shoulder.
- Acute or chronic osteomyelitis.
- Inflammatory joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis/ (pseudo)gout arthritis).
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Active oncological disease.
- Radiologically stage IV shoulder joint arthrosis (rotator cuff arthropathy).
- Systemic or intra-articular corticosteroid therapy less than 60 days prior to planned operation date.
- Intramuscular or peroral corticosteroid treatment less than 30 days prior to planned operation date.
- Acute or chronic conditions that are contraindications for functional testing.
- MRI contraindicated.
- Substance or alcohol abuse.
- Refusal or withdrawal of consent.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06016439 · Tikk23