Menu
Recruiting NCT05987059

Involving Communities in Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis: Making an IMPACT

Phase II Interventional Preconception Health

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: SBIRT Intervention.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Preconception Health. Basic parameters: 18 years — 44 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

With support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, The Center for Maternal Health Equity at Morehouse School of Medicine is conducting a research study to test the implementation of Pre-Pregnancy Counseling in community-based settings.

Detailed description

Severe racial disparities in pregnancy-related cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are preventable and warrant timely community-engaged action. Black women are 3 times more likely to die from a pregnancy-related cause, as compared to white women10 -in part, due to higher rates of cardiovascular risk during pregnancy. More than 80% of pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable. Preconception counseling has been shown to improve maternal health for all women, with clear benefits to address cardiovascular risk factors of obesity, diabetes, hypertension. In order to have impact, evidence-based preconception counseling programs must be delivered through community settings that have a mission to reach at-risk populations of women. Healthy Start/community-based settings are appropriate for this, as they serve an at-risk population of Black women in many locations nationally. The investigators have engaged with Healthy Start and similar community-based settings in Georgia, South Carolina, to identify preconception counseling interventions that are evidence-based and feasible for their staff and community members. This community-engaged approach identified Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) interventions as feasible and acceptable to both staff and patients. In the pilot-test of their SBIRT model approach (Project IMPACT intervention), the investigators demonstrated capacity to screen for pregnancy risks and provide early intervention to n = 23 at-risk persons of reproductive age who wanted to get pregnant within the year. The investigators will build on their pilot work to conduct a hybrid effectiveness/implementation trial (type 2 hybrid) with n = 10 sites serving low-income African American men and women in Georgia, NC, SC, and TN. The investigators will use EPIS as an overarching framework to guide progress across the four phases (exploration, preparation, implementation and sustainment). In Aim 1 (EPIS Preparation phase), the investigators will work with their community partners to tailor the implementation strategy packages (Aim 1a) and their Project IMPACT intervention (Aim 1b) to the context of 10 sites across 4 states -- this tailoring will address contextual determinants of successful implementation from the Pragmatic Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). In Aim 2 (EPIS Implementation phase), we will test an Enhanced vs. Standard implementation strategy package of structured follow-up on the number of pre-conception counseling visits completed and will test any structured follow-up vs. no structured follow-up on readiness to change for key cardiovascular risk factors. In Aim 3 (EPIS Sustainment phase), the investigators will work with their community sites to co-develop an implementation and sustainment guide for the most effective strategy bundle from Aim 2. This work has potential to impact racial disparities in pregnancy-related morbidity/mortality and to advance our collective scientific understanding of the relative benefits of alternate implementation strategy packages.

Interventions

  • Behavioral SBIRT Intervention
    Project IMPACT intervention will follow a Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Model. In the proposed study, staff at community sites will deliver a tailored SBIRT model for people seeking to get pregnant as our "Project IMPACT intervention". SBIRT was originally developed as a public health model designed to provide universal screening, secondary prevention (detecting risky or hazardous substance use before the onset of abuse or dependence), early intervention, and t

Primary outcome measures

  • Implementation [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Effectiveness [Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months]
  • Effectiveness [Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-identify as Black/ African-American
  • Fluent English-Speaker
  • Not pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Own a phone
  • Receive services at the community-based site

Exclusion criteria

\-

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Factorial
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • Morehouse School of Medicine — Atlanta
  • Morehouse School of Medicine — Atlanta

Publications

  • Costanza-Chock S. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press; 2020.
  • Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel JG, Minkler M. On community-based participatory research. Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity. 2017;3:3-16.
  • Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Ahmed SM, Anise A, Azzahir A, Baker KE, Cupito A, Eder M, Everette TD, Erwin K, Felzien M, Freeman E, Gibbs D, Greene-Moton E, Hernandez-Cancio S, Hwang A, Jones F, Jones G, Jones M, Khodyakov D, Michener JL, Milstein B, Oto-Kent DS, Orban M, Pusch B, Shah M, Shaw M, Tarrant J, Wallerstein N, Westfall JM, Williams A, Zaldivar R. Assessing Meaningful Community Engagement: A Conce PMID 35891775
  • Surgo Ventures - The US Maternal Vulnerability Index (MVI). mvi.surgoventures.org. Published 2021. Accessed February 2023. https://mvi.surgoventures.org/
  • Armstrong-Mensah E, Dada D, Bowers A, Muhammad A, Nnoli C. Geographic, Health Care Access, Racial Discrimination, and Socioeconomic Determinants of Maternal Mortality in Georgia, United States. Int J MCH AIDS. 2021;10(2):278-286. doi: 10.21106/ijma.524. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PMID 34938596
  • Maternal, Child, and Infant Health. Mecknc.gov. Published 2019. Accessed February 4, 2023. https://www.mecknc.gov/HealthDepartment/HealthStatistics/Pages/MaternalChildInfantHealth.aspx

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05987059 · MH-CIP Project IMPACT

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗