Menu
Recruiting NCT05986864

Phase I/II Study of SKG0106 Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)

Phase I / Phase II Interventional Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: SKG0106.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration. Basic parameters: from 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States, China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of SKG0106 Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)

Overview

This is a phase 1/2 clinical study to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SKG0106 in subjects with nAMD. Based on results from the phase 1 dose escalation study, the phase 2 expansion study will be conducted.

Interventions

  • Genetic SKG0106
    SKG0106 is a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-based in vivo gene therapeutic product

Primary outcome measures

  • Characteristics of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) [Time frame: 4 Weeks]
  • Type, severity, and incidence of ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs) [Time frame: 52 Weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Mean change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at each visit [Time frame: 52 Weeks]
  • Mean change from baseline in central subfield thickness (CST) at each visit [Time frame: 52 Weeks]
  • Mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcome (VFQ-25) scale score at each visit [Time frame: 52 Weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Voluntary and able to sign a dated ICF prior to any study-related procedures and able to complete the study as required by the protocol;
  • Aged ≥ 50 years at screening;

Study Eye:

  • Diagnosis of nAMD as determined by the PI;
  • Active CNV lesions secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD);
  • Subjects must have been responsive to anti-VEGF therapy as assessed by the PI prior to study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation (e.g., infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, endophthalmitis, infectious blepharitis, uveitis) in the study eye at baseline;
  • Retinal pigment epithelial tear in the study eye at screening;
  • Current vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye or history of vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to baseline;
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may limit visual acuity improvement in the study eye;
  • History of retinal detachment or active retinal detachment in the study eye;
  • Any prior gene therapy.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

China · 5 centers
  • The Second Hospital Of Anhui Medical University — Hefei
  • Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital — Hangzhou
  • Eye Hospital, WMU (Zhejiang Eye Hospital) — Wenzhou
  • Beijing Hospital — Beijing
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital — Beijing
United States · 4 centers
  • Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida - Saint Petersburg — St. Petersburg
  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston — Boston
  • Retina Consultants of Texas — Katy
  • Wagner Kapoor Research Institute — Norfolk

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05986864 · SKG0106-101

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗