Menu
Recruiting NCT05977283

HBsAg Declined Patients Follow-up Study

Observational Hepatitis B Hepatitis B, Chronic

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B, Chronic. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

An Observational Follow-up Study to Describe Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Hepatitis B Patients With HBsAg Decline in Past 6 Months

Overview

The goal of this observational study is to prospectively follow chronic hepatitis B patients who had HBsAg decline in the past 12 months prior to screening. The main question it aims to answer are: \- Describe treatment pattern and its impact on HBsAg loss in hepatitis B patients who had HBsAg decline in past 12 months due to any reason (with or without new molecular entities therapy). Participants will be followed up for 36 months after enrollment and may be extended upon expiration according to study objectives.

Detailed description

This study is a retrospective and prospective follow-up study for participants who had HBsAg decline in past 6 months due to any reason (with or without new molecular entities therapy). The follow-up period will be 3 years (36 months after enrollment) and may be extended upon expiration according to study objectives. Patients are treated or untreated based on current clinical practice guidelines, and every medical decision and course of treatment will reflect exclusively the decision of the treating physician in a routine clinical situation. The conduct of this non-interventional follow-up study and its documentation procedures will not affect the routine treatment of the subjects. It is only requested that any medical decisions, procedures and data during this study be documented in the electronic case report/record form (eCRF) according to the study protocol as available from routine medical care. Diagnostic testing and monitoring procedures are exclusively based on the decision of the treating physician.

In general, patients with hepatitis B should be monitored at least twice a year (every 6 months), every 12 weeks during NUC therapy and every 2 to 4 weeks during interferon-α therapy in accordance with clinical needs (Table 3-1 and Table 3-2). For patients had HBsAg decline in past 6 months due to new molecular entities therapy, The baseline of this follow-up study is the time when NME discontinued (within 28 days of the last does of NME or within 2 half-life period of the NME). For patients had HBsAg decline in past 6 months without new molecular entities therapy, the baseline should be the time of enrolling in the study. The time of enrolling in this study may be posterior or equal to baseline, which is not necessarily the baseline of this study. The visit window period is ±28 days for patients with NUC therapy and ±7 days for patients with interferon-α therapy. Follow-up study visit data can be collected retrospectively if it has been performed before entry of this study.

Medical decisions, procedures and data before this follow-up study will also be documented if available. Participants will be asked to store a certain amount of blood samples in site during study visit for future HBV markers, host immunity or other related tests. The retained remaining samples from previous tests before this follow-up study may also be used for HBV related exploratory research after patient informed consent.

Primary outcome measures

  • Proportion of participants with HBsAg loss (<0.05 IU/ml) at 12 months [Time frame: at week 48]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Proportion of participants with HBsAg loss or HBsAg seroconversion. [Time frame: at week 48, 96 and 144]
  • Change from baseline in quantitative HBsAg levels over time [Time frame: at week 48, 96 and 144]
  • Change from baseline in quantitative anti-HBs levels over time [Time frame: at week 48, 96 and 144]
  • Incidence of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, other HBV complications and mortality, at each study visit [Time frame: at week 48, 96 and 144]
  • The change of Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) over time [Time frame: at week 48, 96 and 144]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have HBsAg decline ≥0.5 log10 IU/mL in past 12 months prior to screening due to any reason (with or without new molecular entities therapy). Among the enrolled subjects, 70% must have HBsAg decline ≥1 log10 IU/mL or actual values ≤3 log10 IU/mL.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to comply with the study protocol according to International Council for Harmonization (ICH) and local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates their participant in this study.
  • Participants who are currently participating in interventional clinical study exploring HBV treatment.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University — Guangzhou

Publications

  • BLUMBERG BS, ALTER HJ, VISNICH S. A "NEW" ANTIGEN IN LEUKEMIA SERA. JAMA. 1965 Feb 15;191:541-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03080070025007. No abstract available. PMID 14239025
  • European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017 Aug;67(2):370-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 18. PMID 28427875
  • Brunetto MR. A new role for an old marker, HBsAg. J Hepatol. 2010 Apr;52(4):475-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.020. Epub 2010 Jan 30. No abstract available. PMID 20185190
  • Chan HL, Thompson A, Martinot-Peignoux M, Piratvisuth T, Cornberg M, Brunetto MR, Tillmann HL, Kao JH, Jia JD, Wedemeyer H, Locarnini S, Janssen HL, Marcellin P. Hepatitis B surface antigen quantification: why and how to use it in 2011 - a core group report. J Hepatol. 2011 Nov;55(5):1121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jun 28. PMID 21718667
  • - Lau G K K, Marcellin P, Brunetto M, et al. 917 on-treatment monitoring of HBsAg levels to predict response to peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B[J]. Journal of Hepatology, 2009, 50, Supplement 1(0): S333

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05977283 · NFEC-2022-260

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗