Menu
Recruiting NCT05968729

Assessment of Gait Adaptation Due to an Asymmetric Walking Protocol

No phase Interventional Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Active Comparator: 0.25 m/s asymmetric session first, Active Comparator: 0.50 m/s asymmetric session first.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Basic parameters: 18 years — 30 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The purpose of this work is to conduct a comparative research-focused study to evaluate the effectiveness of how purposefully induced asymmetric walking protocols restore healthy, symmetric limb loading in individuals following post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. Additionally, computational modeling and machine learning to model knee loading in the clinic to determine the optimal asymmetric walking protocol to restore healthy gait in post-ACLR individuals.

Detailed description

This is an intervention study in which participants will be randomized as to the order in which each of the two sessions are completed. Forty post-ACLR will who present with between-limb gait differences will perform two asymmetric walking sessions where they will walk with between-limb gait speed differences of 0.25 m/s and 0.50 m/s at three 15-minute intervals to evaluate the restoration of healthy gait. Post-ACLR participants will perform an asymmetric walking intervention protocol session on two different days. On one day they will perform the protocol with a 0.25 m/s between-limb difference and on a separate day they will perform the protocol with a 0.50 m/s between limb difference. For the 0.25 m/s condition, one limb will be set to 1.0 m/s and the other 1.25 m/s (i.e., 1.0 m/s - 1.25 m/s). Similarly, for the 0.50 m/s condition, one limb will be set to 1.0 m/s and the other 1.50 m/s (i.e., 1.0 m/s - 1.50 m/s). Each participant will perform both the 0.25 m/s and 0.50 m/s protocols on separate days, and we will randomize who performs which protocol first or second. At least 3 weeks must pass between the two one-day sessions. Patient-specific simulations will be generated in OpenSim for each of the 40 post-ACLR individuals to assess differences in knee joint loading. Together with machine learning, these models will help evaluate the effectiveness of the asymmetric walking protocol in reducing detrimental knee loading. The study team hypothesizes that the 0.50 m/s perturbation will produce a larger reduction in between-limb asymmetry than the 0.25 m/s perturbation and reduce detrimental knee loading.

Interventions

  • Other Active Comparator: 0.25 m/s asymmetric session first
    Participants will first perform an asymmetric walking trial where the between-limb gait speed difference is 0.25 m/s on day one. On the second day, participants will perform an asymmetric walking trial where the between-limb gait speed difference is 0.50 m/s.
  • Other Active Comparator: 0.50 m/s asymmetric session first
    Participants will first perform an asymmetric walking trial where the between-limb gait speed difference is 0.50 m/s on day one. On the second day, participants will perform an asymmetric walking trial where the between-limb gait speed difference is 0.25 m/s.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in Loading Rate [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, and Post-Treatment (immediately following the completion of the second session)]
  • Change in Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force [Time frame: Baseline, Post-Treatment (immediately following the completion of the second session)]
  • Change in Stride Time [Time frame: Baseline, Post-Treatment (immediately following the completion of the second session)]
  • Change in Knee Loading [Time frame: Baseline, Post-Treatment (immediately following the completion of the second session)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to read and speak English
  • Age 18 - 30 years old
  • Undergone ACLR surgery at the UConn Musculoskeletal Institute
  • Must not have any concomitant surgeries or injuries
  • Must be cleared to return-to-sport by a physician after they have completed rehabilitation
  • Must be within 1 month of having been cleared for return-to-sport
  • Must present with between-limb gait differences in load rate greater than 10%

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants who have any recent inflammation, bleeding disorders, active bleeding, or infection within the lower limbs.
  • History of injuries to their patellar tendon
  • Cannot walk for extended periods of time
  • Cannot have had any back and/or lower extremity injury that affects their ability to move.
  • Cannot have difficulty or pain with walking, raising your arms, jogging, or jumping
  • Must not be allergic to tape.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Basic science

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • University of Connecticut — Storrs

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05968729 · H21-0176 · K01AR079043

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗