Menu
Recruiting NCT05959837

Usability of the Adapted Rower for People With Spinal Cord Injury

No phase Interventional Spinal Cord Injuries

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Adaptive Rowing Exercise.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Spinal Cord Injuries. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine usability of a locally built adaptive rower for people with spinal cord injury using an established and tested design. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What exercise intensity of activity do users achieve on the rower for steady state and interval rowing plans? 2. What assistance is required for setup and usage of the adaptive rower? 3. What do users think about the ease of use and what is their satisfaction with the adaptive rower? Participants will complete a one-time exercise session with two adaptive rower bouts (10-15 minutes each) with a rest period in between.

Detailed description

A single group rolling prospective cohort study with a target of 15 participants will evaluate the initial design prototype using the an existing adaptive rower design. Participants will have one visit to the University of South Carolina Rehabilitation lab. Participants will receive an orientation to the rowing machine and available handle, grip and trunk support options. Training will be provided in proper rowing technique and use of the rate of perceived exertion scale. Participants will be fitted with a heart rate monitoring device and resting heart rate established. Participants will perform two bouts of rowing exercise each with a 2-minute warm up and cool down in addition to the following: (1)10 minutes of steady state rowing with goals to achieve moderate intensity exertion levels, followed by a variable rest period to return exertion and heart rate to initial levels, (2) 10 minutes of interval rowing alternating between one minute of low-moderate intensity and 30 seconds of moderate-vigorous intensity. Participants heart rate will be monitored and recorded throughout the testing period, with rate of perceived exertion at start, midpoint and end of steady state period, and at start, at each interval, and at end in interval period.

Interventions

  • Other Adaptive Rowing Exercise
    Participants will perform two bouts of rowing exercise each with a 2-minute warm up and cool down in addition to the following: (1)10 minutes of steady state rowing with goals to achieve moderate intensity exertion levels, followed by a variable rest period to return exertion and heart rate to initial levels, (2) 10 minutes of interval rowing alternating between one minute of low-moderate intensity and 30 seconds of moderate-vigorous intensity.

Primary outcome measures

  • Heart Rate, (beats per minute), mean and range at rest, mean and range during steady state portion, mean and range during interval portion [Time frame: During Exercise intervention]
  • Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE)-Borg 6-20 Scale [Time frame: During Exercise intervention]
  • Pain Scale (0-10 visual analog scale, higher means worse pain ) and body location of pain verbalized by participant and recorded by study personnel [Time frame: During Exercise intervention]
  • Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (Short); average score (1-5) [Time frame: Immediately after the intervention]
  • System Useability Scale, average score (1-5) [Time frame: Immediately after the intervention]
  • Pain Scale (0-10 visual analog scale, higher means worse pain ) and body location of pain [Time frame: Two days post intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Exercise Time (minutes and seconds): recorded by study personnel [Time frame: during exercise intervention]
  • Rest Time minutes and seconds: recorded by study personnel [Time frame: during exercise intervention]
  • Type of Rower Handle Used [Time frame: Immediately after the intervention]
  • Grip Assist Used [Time frame: Immediately after the intervention]
  • Trunk Assist Used [Time frame: Immediately after the intervention]
  • Assistance Provided at Setup [Time frame: Immediately after the intervention]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • use a wheelchair for mobility,
  • can perform the rowing motion with their arms
  • have enough grip strength to maintain grip on the rower handle with or without grip assist straps
  • are cleared to exercise through the electronic physical readiness questionnaire or physician release

Exclusion criteria

  • current self-reported pressure wounds
  • pain with rowing motion.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Public Health Research Center — Columbia

Publications

  • Martin Ginis KA, van der Scheer JW, Latimer-Cheung AE, Barrow A, Bourne C, Carruthers P, Bernardi M, Ditor DS, Gaudet S, de Groot S, Hayes KC, Hicks AL, Leicht CA, Lexell J, Macaluso S, Manns PJ, McBride CB, Noonan VK, Pomerleau P, Rimmer JH, Shaw RB, Smith B, Smith KM, Steeves JD, Tussler D, West CR, Wolfe DL, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal PMID 29070812
  • Farkas GJ, Gorgey AS, Dolbow DR, Berg AS, Gater DR Jr. Energy Expenditure, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Body Composition Following Arm Cycling or Functional Electrical Stimulation Exercises in Spinal Cord Injury: A 16-Week Randomized Controlled Trial. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021;27(1):121-134. doi: 10.46292/sci20-00065. PMID 33814890
  • Sawatzky B, Herrington B, Choi K, Ben Mortenson W, Borisoff J, Sparrey C, Laskin JJ. Acute physiological comparison of sub-maximal exercise on a novel adapted rowing machine and arm crank ergometry in people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2022 Aug;60(8):694-700. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00757-2. Epub 2022 Feb 3. PMID 35110695
  • Wong RN, Stewart AL, Sawatzky B, Laskin JJ, Borisoff J, Mattie J, Sparrey CJ, Mortenson WB. Exploring exercise participation and the usability of the adaptive rower and arm crank ergometer through wheelchair users' perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(15):3915-3924. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1894245. Epub 2021 Mar 17. PMID 33730952
  • Hansen RK, de Wit JLJ, Samani A, Laessoe U, Figlewski K, Larsen RG. Wheelchair-modified ergometer rowing exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury: a feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022 Apr 30;8(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00518-6. PMID 35487894

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05959837 · Pro00129966

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗