Young Adult-Mediated Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Changes in CRC screening awareness and intentions.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Young Adult-Mediated Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening. Basic parameters: 25 years — 75 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Developing a Young Adult-Mediated Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Screening Age-Eligible Adults
Overview
This study will garner preliminary data to develop a young adult-mediated intervention whereby a younger family member encourages their older family member to get colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In Aim 1, survey data from n=150 younger (25-44 years old) and n=150 older (45-75 years old) adults living in rural communities will be collected. In Aim 2, intervention components will be evaluated using n=9 focus groups. The novel intervention will be assessed via a pilot trial (n=15 adult child/parent dyads) in Aim 3.
Detailed description
Aim 1. Environmental Scan of Health Communications Landscape. Using quantitative methods, examine the health communications landscape of younger (25-44 years old) and older (45-75 years old) adults living in rural communities. N=300 survey responses (n=150 from each age group) will be analyzed to determine the primary channels and sources of health-related information, quantify the extent to which these residents engage in family communications about cancer screening, and identify potential strategies for upward communications. Individual factors (i.e., CRC screening knowledge, health literacy, and numeracy) and specific facilitators of and barriers to upward communication about CRC screening will be also assessed.
Aim 2. Message Development and Refinement. Using qualitative methods, develop and evaluate intervention components to facilitate effective upward communications about CRC prevention and screening. To accomplish this aim, we will: 1) use findings from Aim 1 to design intervention content and materials that leverage relevant communication channels and strategies, and address barriers to upward communication and 2) conduct n=9 focus groups with adult children 25-44 years of age (n=3), CRC screening age-eligible adults, 45-75 years old (n=3), and adult child/parent dyads (n=3), to assess message acceptability and refine key content areas. We will iterate and modify intervention components based on feedback.
Aim 3. Preliminary Testing. Using a single arm, open-label, pre-test post-test design (n=15 adult child/parent dyads), assess the impact of a young adult-mediated intervention to increase CRC screening among a paired age-eligible family member (e.g., parent/grandparent). The focus of the intervention will be on changes in CRC screening awareness and intentions among the age-eligible adult, but we hypothesize that the young adult could benefit as well. Thus, in addition to assessing feasibility and acceptability, we will assess changes in 1) CRC screening intentions among the age-eligible adults and 2) CRC health literacy and awareness of screening guidelines among the younger adult participant.
Interventions
- Behavioral Changes in CRC screening awareness and intentions
Using a single arm, open-label, pre-test post-test design (n=15 adult child/parent dyads), assess the impact of a young adult-mediated intervention to increase CRC screening among a paired age-eligible family member (e.g., parent/grandparent). The focus of the intervention will be on changes in CRC screening awareness and intentions among the age-eligible adult, but we hypothesize that the young adult could benefit as well. Thus, in addition to assessing feasibility and acceptability, we will as
Primary outcome measures
- CRC screening knowledge and awareness [Time frame: 2-months post-intervention]
- CRC screeningintentions [Time frame: 2-months post-intervention]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Residents of counties in the Virginia/North Carolina CRC hotspot
- 25-75 years old
- Able to speak, write, and comprehend English
- Younger adult participants in Aims 3 must have an older, screening age-eligible relative with whom they speak with regularly (i.e., ≥ once every two weeks)
Exclusion criteria
- Participants in Aims 1 or 2 will be ineligible for Aim 3
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Screening
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- Virginia Commonwealth University — Richmond
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05936931 · IRB202300089 · R03CA270837-01A1 · HM20026698