Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization

Official title

Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization. A Pilot Study

Overview

This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen. The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.

Detailed description

It is well known that tartar makes at-home oral hygiene care more difficult. The plaque and bacteria that accumulate on tartar are considered the primary factors contributing to gum disease. Conventional gum surgery is commonly performed using loupes (magnification glasses). The use of a videoscope, a handheld miniature camera, allows for greater visualization during surgery. While the debris on the root surface of teeth is not visible with loupes, it is easily observed when the root surface is visualized with the high magnification of the videoscope. The videoscope allows for up to 40x magnification to visualize underneath the gumline. The use of loupes and the videoscope are methods of visualization that are standard of care at the Texas A\&M College of Dentistry.

This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes during surgery vs. surgery only using loupes. No aspect of this study is investigational, however, bacterial samples will be collected from the patients at multiple time points to assess outcomes. The collection of bacterial samples for research will be conducted through paper points and an oral rinse. These methods are well-established methods of data collection.

Data will be sent to OralDNA labs for analysis. A special contract is required between the school and the company as they will be paid for the services rendered.

Hypothesis: Does the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes, as compared to only using loupes for visualization during surgery, have a positive effect (i.e. reduced inflammation and active disease) on the outcomes of gum surgery.

Primary outcome measures

• Probing Depth (in millimeters) [Time frame: baseline]
• Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [Time frame: baseline]
• Bleeding on Probing (yes or no) [Time frame: baseline]
• Probing Depth (in millimeters) [Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]
• Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]
• Bleeding on Probing [Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]
• Probing Depth (in millimeters) [Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]
• Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]
• Bleeding on Probing [Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]
• Probing Depths (in millimeters) [Time frame: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.]

Secondary outcome measures (4)

• Bacterial Species Identification [Time frame: These will be collected at the initial visit]
• Bacterial Species Identification [Time frame: These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]
• Bacterial Species Identification [Time frame: These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]
• Bacterial Species Identification [Time frame: These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Patients that are treatment planned for open flap debridement in two or more quadrants
• age >18 years old
• Stage III periodontitis diagnosis
• Probing depths ≥5mm with bleeding on probing

Exclusion criteria

• systemic disease affecting bone metabolism
• current smokers
• diabetes
• pregnant women
• adults unable to consent
• prisoners
• previous or current bisphosphonate use
• recent joint replacement requiring prophylactic antibiotics
• teeth that necessitate and undergo osseous recontouring (shaping of the bone) will be excluded

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model

Cohort

Study locations

United States · 1 center

• Texas A&M University School of Dentistry — Dallas

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05932017 · IRB2022-1044

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗