Menu
Recruiting NCT05920824

Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Tricuspid Regurgitation

Observational Atrial Fibrillation Functional Mitral Regurgitation Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Echocardiogram.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Atrial Fibrillation, Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical Phenotypes, Risk Factors, & Determinants of Outcome in Functional Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

Overview

A prospective, observational cohort study designed to identify clinical phenotypes and evaluate predictors \& outcomes of functional mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Participant will under go: * Baseline echocardiography * Cpex Echocardiography * Blood test: BNP * 1 year follow up Echocardiography Participants will be stratified into three subgroups: * Atrial Functional MR * Atrial Functional TR * Mixed MR \& TR

Detailed description

Rationale

The natural history and risk factors for atrial valve disease are poorly understood and characterised. This study will examine differences between atrial mitral and atrial tricuspid disease and help us understand the natural history of these pathologies.

Study objectives

Primary objective

* Identify \& characterise phenotypes in functional mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation * Identify risk factors for progression of disease and outcome.

Secondary objective

Compare the three groups: atrial functional MR, atrial functional TR, and mixed disease, and identify any differences/similarities.

Primary endpoint

Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area at 1 year

Secondary endpoint

* Progression of valve disease defined as worsening of mitral or tricuspid regurgitation \> 1 grade at 1 year. * Functional: New York Heart Association Class, Predicted VO2max (\<84%). * Heart Failure admission within 1 year of recruitment. * Mortality.

Recruitment will take place from the out-patient clinics \& echocardiography laboratory at St Bartholomew's Hospital

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test Echocardiogram
    Ultrasound scan of the heart

Primary outcome measures

  • Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area at 1 year [Time frame: 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Progression of valve disease defined as worsening of mitral or tricuspid regurgitation > 1 grade at 1 year. [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Functional: New York Heart Association Class, Predicted VO2max (<84%). [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Heart Failure admission within 1 year of recruitment. [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Mortality [Time frame: 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent
  • Age of 18 years or older
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Moderate or severe atrial valve disease
  • Adequate 2D echocardiography views including parasternal long axis, short axis, apical two chamber, apical three chamber and four chamber.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling or unable to give consent
  • Left ventricular impairment (ejection fraction < 50%).
  • Primary/organic valve disease

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United Kingdom · 1 center
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital — London

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05920824 · 326447

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗