Nutritional Support on Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness for Patients at Risk
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: nutritional support.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Malnutrition. Basic parameters: 18 years — 90 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Impact of Nutritional Support on Outcome,Cost/Effectiveness for Patient at Risk
Overview
The impact of nutritional support for the patients at nutritional risk on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Detailed description
Although it was often to hear that malnutrition ratio in Aisa hospitalized patient was 40%-70% , there was no evidence to elaborate the prevalence of nutritional risk and malnutrition on hospitalized patients of Asia. Also in USA no data for nutritional risk. In 2002, scientists group headed by Kondrup from : European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition demonstrated that randomized controlled clinical trials showed patients may get benefit from nutrition support when they with nutrition risk. Based on these evidences, a simpler method was established by European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition in year 2002 in Munich \& it was demonstrated useful to evaluate the appropriate use of nutrition support at present time. This method was named as Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS).
Investigators propose to survey the prevalence of malnutrition \& nutrition risk in large cities' large/middle size hospitalized patients in China, Europe and USA use NRS tool. As well, we also aim to figure out the current nutrition support status in current large/middle size hospitals through this survey.
Investigators also propose to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition and non-nutritional support, and to examine the clinical outcomes of nutritional support in certain patients at nutritional risk identified by NRS-2002.
For international cooperation, the partners are Professor Kondrup of Europe and Professor Nolan from Johns Hopkins Hospital,there are students from a cooperative project with Johns Hopkins Hospital for Doctor of Philosophy students 2005-2011.
Interventions
- Dietary supplement nutritional support
nutritional support
Primary outcome measures
- The incidence of Infectious complication [Time frame: during the hospital stay]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Total cost amount [Time frame: during the hospital stay]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- patients be in hospital overnight
- diagnoses according to the protocol of cohort study for cost effectiveness
Exclusion criteria
- patients admitting from emergency department
- patients who undergone operation before second morning of hospitalization
- patients who dose not give Informed Consents
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
Study locations
China · 2 centers
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital — Beijing
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University — Beijing
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05917418 · CMA2023CSPEN