MoMa Signature During Granulomatosis

"Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease characterized by the presence of coalescing, tightly clustered, non-necrotizing granulomas. The diagnosis is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, the presence of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation, and the exclusion of alternative granulomatous diseases. A wide range of clinical phenotypes are observed depending on the location of the granulomatous lesions which can affect any organ, with the lungs being the most affected site. Sarcoidosis shares many similarities with tuberculosis, in which granuloma formation is triggered by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb). These phenotypic similarities between the two diseases present many challenges for diagnosis, clinical management and therapy.

Our understanding of the factors that contribute to sarcoidosis development, granuloma formation and maintenance remains limited. Part of this challenge is that granuloma development may involve both environmental and genetic factors, which contribute to the recruitment of immune cells to form the granuloma. Immune cells involved in the granuloma include (1) CD4 Th1 and Th17 T cells and their associated cytokines (e.g, IFNγ, TNFα, IL-17, IL-2); and (2) monocytes (Mo) and macrophages (Ma) including proinflammatory M1 and pro-fibrosis M2 types. However, the specific factors that contribute to granuloma maintenance and evolution remain to be identified. Among them, we can hypothesized that trained immunity, persistence of the antigen, or the microenvironment are involved in this chronic dysregulated immune response. Such an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease may allow development of new treatments, as currently corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy.

Our main hypothesis is that granuloma formation and maintenance mainly relies on the overactivation of monocytes (Mo) and macrophages (Ma). To this end, the study aims (i) to define MoMa systemic signature in sarcoidosis, (ii) to characterize this signature in situ on tissue samples, and (iii) to identify causative factors that participate to the MoMa chronic overactivation. Thus, a cohort of sarcoidosis patients will be compared with tuberculosis patients. The MoMa systemic signature will be defined on whole blood (TruCulture model) and then in situ through different methods (multi-parameter spectral flow cytometry, RNA-seq, Luminex, imaging mass cytometry). The epigenome of monocytes will be studied thanks to CUT\&Tag. The MoMa systemic signature will be defined ex vivo at different time points (M0, M6 and M12) during the course of the disease with phenotypic, transcriptomic, cytokine and functional approaches. The previously identified signature will be studied in situ and completed by the characterization of granuloma architecture and microenvironmental interactions, which could be modulated by epigenetic modifications. Hence, the epigenome of monocytes will be analyzed in two groups (sarcoidosis and tuberculosis). These results would allow to better understand sarcoidosis physiopathology and, in fine, may raise new therapeutic strategies. Finally, the study could challenge the dogma on innate immunity/auto-inflammation versus adaptive immunity/auto-immunity/memory."

• monocyte activation in tuberculosis measured by epigenomic [Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.]
• Identification of a pathogen that triggers sarcoidosis development by metagenomic study [Time frame: Samples collected before treatment/at diagnosis]
• identification of epigenetic modifications of monocytes by CUT&Tag method [Time frame: 12 months of follow-up.]
• Identification of a diagnostic test to discriminate sarcoidosis and tuberculosis [Time frame: Samples collected before treatment/at diagnosis]
• real-time analysis of oxidative phosphorylation of monocyte [Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up]
• real-time analysis of glycolysis of monocytes [Time frame: up to 12 month of follow up]