Effect of Drain Care on Infection Rate and Quality of Life in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Showering 48 hours after surgery.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Infections, Quality of Life. Basic parameters: 18 years — 100 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether showering with surgical drain tubes in place after first stage breast reconstruction causes increased risk of infection. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is there an increased risk of infection/complications with showering 48 hours after drain tubes are in place * Does showering after 48 hours with drain tubes in place affect quality of life.
Detailed description
SSI (soft tissue infection) is an aggravating risk specifically associated with implants. Breast reconstruction quotes infection rates anywhere from 1-35% while cosmetic augmentations quote rates around 1.5%. Usually, the causative organisms are skin flora like Staph aureus and Staph epidermidis. Occasionally mycobacterium and other atypical bacterium are isolated more commonly in the immunocompromised. Despite perioperative antibiotics, SSI is still a prevalent complication increasing total expenditure of patients and hospital systems upwards of $4000/patient in reoperation fees and hospital stay costs. Skin prep and antibiotics in the preoperative phase is very important to the sterile technique and decreasing risk of infection by decreasing bacterial load at the time of incision and surgery. However, postoperative care and interventions are less strictly evaluated and defined. Currently, there is no standard of care in regards to showering post operatively with JP (Jackson-Pratt) drains in place. Timing of showering is ultimately based on surgeon preference. In practice, the investigators routinely have had patients wait to shower until the JP drains are removed. The investigators hypothesize that showering daily, even with drains in place, will not increase rates of infection in breast reconstruction and perhaps improve quality of life during first stage. This study is prospective with participants randomized to either shower daily after 48hrs or standard of care and shower after drains removed. The participants will be asked to fill out a quality of life survey 90 days after enrollment. The patients will also be monitored for signs of infection for 90 days.
Interventions
- Other Showering 48 hours after surgery
The main intervention is allowing patients to shower 48 hours after surgery
Primary outcome measures
- Presence of Post Operative Infection [Time frame: 90 days]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Quality of Life Survey [Time frame: 90 days]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- undergoing breast surgery with placement of tissue expander and drains, acceptance of protocol and procedures, age > 18
Exclusion criteria
- no existing wounds, previous infections related to implant device if delayed, refusal by patient
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Other
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- University of Missouri — Columbia
Publications
- Ogawa H, Tahara S. Postoperative Showering for Patients With Closed Suction Drainage: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions. Cureus. 2022 Mar 30;14(3):e23665. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23665. eCollection 2022 Mar. PMID 35505721
- Gowda AU, Chopra K, Brown EN, Slezak S, Rasko Y. Preventing Breast Implant Contamination in Breast Reconstruction: A National Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Feb;78(2):153-156. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000822. PMID 27464530
- Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, Rylander R, Lagergren J, Jurell G, Wickman M, Sandelin K. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast. 2005 Jun;14(3):201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.10.008. PMID 15927829
- Hanna KR, Tilt A, Holland M, Colen D, Bowen B, Stovall M, Lee A, Wang J, Drake D, Lin K, Uroskie T, Campbell CA. Reducing Infectious Complications in Implant Based Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Early Expansion and Prolonged Drain Use. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76 Suppl 4:S312-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000760. PMID 26914348
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05846438 · 2092673