Menu
Recruiting NCT05843695

Enhancing Psychotherapy for Veterans and Service Members With PTSD and Anxiety

No phase Interventional Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Anxiety Disorders

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: iTCBT-I, iTCBT-G, TAU.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety Disorders. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Enhancing Intensive Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Veterans With PTSD and Anxiety Disorders

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different intensive formats of delivering cognitive-behavioral treatment for people with PTSD and anxiety disorders. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is iTCBT delivered in individual and group formats more effective than TAU in improving anxiety symptoms and quality of life? * For treatment non-responders, is iTCBT-Enhanced more effective than TAU improving anxiety symptoms and quality of life? * Does iTCBT-Individual produce a larger improvement in anxiety and quality of life compared with iTCBT-Group? Participants will undergo several assessments throughout the course of the study. Based on randomization, they will receive: (1) iTCBT in an individual format over a 2-week period, (2) iTCBT in a group format over a 2-day period, or (3) usual care. Those who do not show a response to treatment will receive 4 additional individual therapy sessions.

Detailed description

Anxiety disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are among the leading mental health problems in the nation and are highly prevalent among service members and Veterans. The process of recovery and reintegration across the lifespan for military personnel with PTSD and anxiety disorders remains a significant problem. Due to the debilitating nature of these disorders, resuming and participating in major life roles following deployment can be challenging and often leads to avoidance of everyday activities and social withdrawal. Consequences of untreated anxiety-based disorders range from substantial impairment in social, vocational, emotional and physical functioning to high rates of suicide.

Despite the debilitating nature of posttraumatic stress and anxiety, these disorders can be successfully treated with CBT. However, relatively few Veterans take advantage of these treatments. One explanation is that individual- and systemic- level barriers to treatment engagement are inherent in the structure of standard CBT delivery formats, which require weekly appointments over a 3 to 4-month period. Furthermore, because current CBTs are disorder-specific and often do not directly address psychiatric comorbidity, individuals frequently need to seek additional treatment after completing one course of CBT. These collective barriers point to the need for improved treatment delivery methods.

Transdiagnostic treatment approaches hold potential in addressing the many barriers associated with treatment engagement. Transdiagnostic approaches distill the same treatment principles embedded across different protocols for anxiety disorders and PTSD into a single protocol without targeting a specific disorder. Fear is a common element across these disorders but the source of fear and how symptoms manifest differentiates one disorder from another.

Although transdiagnostic approaches show excellent potential as a single treatment for multiple disorders, few studies to date have systematically examined the effectiveness of transdiagnostic treatment with a military population. Research also indicates that service members with anxiety disorders often prefer treatment in an individual therapy format. Group treatments typically show higher rates of dropout, which supports the importance of treating anxiety using individual formats. Similarly, given the many barriers associated with the structure of traditional psychotherapy delivery, more attention in recent years has been directed at examining intensive or massed treatment approaches in delivering trauma-focused treatment. Such approaches seek to shorten the overall length of treatment by providing psychotherapy in longer and stronger doses.

The proposed clinical trial tests two different delivery formats of iTCBT (Individual vs. Group) and the enhancement of iTCBT for participants who do now show significant improvement following a course of iTCBT. Veterans and service members with PTSD and anxiety will be recruited for the study. The extended version of iTCBT (iTCBT-E) will provide 6 additional hours of individual treatment over 2 weeks. Differences in outcomes between participants who receive the intervention in individual versus group formats will also be examined.

Interventions

  • Behavioral iTCBT-I
    Individual format over 2 weeks
  • Behavioral iTCBT-G
    Group format over 2 days
  • Behavioral TAU
    Standard care

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in Quality of Life score on the Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (QLES-Q-SF) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT conditions (Individual & Group) and TAU. [Time frame: 6-Month Follow-Up]
  • Change in Anxiety score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT conditions (Individual & Group) and TAU. [Time frame: 6-Month Follow-Up]
  • Change in Quality of Life score on the Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (QLES-Q-SF) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT Enhanced (iTCBT-E) condition and TAU. [Time frame: 6-Month Follow-Up]
  • Change in Anxiety score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from Baseline to 6-Month Follow-Up between the iTCBT Enhanced (iTCBT-E) condition and TAU. [Time frame: 6-Month Follow-Up]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Magnitude of Change in Quality of Life score on Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (QLES-Q-SF) from Baseline to 3- and 6-Month Follow-Ups between the iTCBT Individual and Group Conditions. [Time frame: 3- and 6-Month Follow-Ups]
  • Magnitude of Change in Anxiety score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from Baseline to 3- and 6-Month Follow-Ups between the iTCBT Individual and Group Conditions. [Time frame: 3- and 6-Month Follow-Ups]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Veteran/Service Member at least 18 years old
  • Current diagnosis of at least one anxiety-based disorder: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Other Specified Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorder, Other Specified Anxiety Disorder, and Unspecified Anxiety Disorder (based on ADIS-5)
  • Moderate-to-poor life enjoyment and satisfaction as indicated by a score of 47 or lower on the QLES-Q-SF
  • Stable on psychotropic medication for 4 weeks before study participation
  • Willing to be randomized to treatment condition

Exclusion criteria

  • Active symptoms of mania or psychosis at baseline (based on ADIS-5)
  • Depression with active suicidal ideation and intent that would preclude treatment (based on ADIS-5 \& BDI-II)
  • Moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment as indicated by the SLUMS (a score below 20)
  • Veterans/Service Members with comorbid substance/alcohol use or dependence are study eligible but must agree to reduce and limit their use of substances during the active course of treatment, particularly during exposure exercises. If they do not agree to this, they will be excluded
  • Undergoing concurrent transdiagnostic CBT specifically targeting any of the above-mentioned disorders

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center — Houston

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05843695 · H-52390

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗