Complete Revascularization Via Inferior Part-sternotomy
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Inferior part-sternotomy, Full median sternotomy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Complete Revascularization, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Achieving Complete Revascularization of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Via Inferior Part-Sternotomy (The ACRIS-MICABG Trial)
Overview
To verify the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for complete revascularization of multivessel coronary artery disease via inferior part-sternotomy, We aim to randomize 260 patients undergoing isolated Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to compare the ratios of complete revascularization between inferior part-sternotomy CABG and full median sternotomy CABG from 9 hospitals in China.
Detailed description
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has always been the gold standard for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), especially for left main (LM) coronary disease, patients with high SYNTAX scores, and diabetes mellitus. By minimally invasive strategy, patients recover significantly faster in the early post-operative period. However, a prospective randomized controlled trials is needed to compare the ratios of complete revascularization between inferior part-sternotomy CABG and full median sternotomy CABG.
Objectives:
To verify the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for complete revascularization of multivessel coronary artery disease via inferior part-sternotomy.
Study design:
This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. We aim to randomize 260 patients undergoing isolated CABG to compare the ratios of complete revascularization between inferior part-sternotomy CABG and full median sternotomy CABG from 9 hospitals in China. We consecutively screen patients during the study enrollment period and seek informed consent from all eligible patients. Patients who give informed consent are randomly assigned to undergo inferior part-sternotomy CABG or full median sternotomy CABG by a central randomization system. An expert group composed of three doctors with CABG qualifications will develop a plan achieving complete revascularization by coronary angiography images before the operation, including the number and location of proximal and distal anastomoses. The actual bypass procedure will be recorded and compared with the preoperative plan. We will follow-up participants until 10 years after the operation. To reduce the variation among surgeons, we require that all CABG are performed by qualified surgeons. The surgeons in this study needs to have experience in at least 100 cases of full median sternotomy CABG, and at least 5 cases of inferior part-sternotomy CABG.The ethics committees at all 9 participating hospitals approved this study.
Randomization A web-based central randomization system incorporated in the registration system is used for allocation (http://ccsr.cvs-china.com/). The randomization code with fixed block size is generated by SAS. Randomization is stratified by investigation center. When an eligible patient gives informed consent, the investigator logs in to the randomization webpage and obtain the random number along with treatment group (Inferior part-sternotomy or Full median sternotomy group) automatically distributed by the system after the basic patient information be confirmed. The statistician responsible for the randomization code and the staff who develops the Interactive Web-based Response (IWR) system are independent of each other.
Intervention Surgical procedure.The patient is placed in the supine position. Standard intubation and hemodynamic monitoring are used. Heparinization is standardized for on-pump CABG. The surgeon is given discretion to ensure that his choice in surgery would ensure the patient´s safety (including which graft to use or the choice of anatomic regions to revascularize). The surgeries are performed with the usual methods of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with aortic cross-clamp technique. Myocardial protection strategies include blood cardioplegia and moderate hypothermia. For both types of surgeries, an excellent exposure is required.
Inferior part-sternotomy CABG.A sternal saw is used to split the sternum from the xiphoid process to the second intercostal space where the sternum is partially transected by turning the saw rightward. Remaining coronary bypassing techniques are same in both groups according to clinical practice and preference of the operator.
Full median sternotomy CABG. A midline skin incision is made over the sternum, starting from the sternal angle and extending slightly beyond the xiphoid process. The sternum is fully split by a sternal saw.
Medication. All participants are prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 100 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily from the first day post-CABG until 3 months post-operation. Prescription of other concomitant medications such as β-blockers, statins, and antihypertensive agents is determined by local surgeons according to ACC/AHA guidelines.
The trial data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis with patients included in the groups assigned at randomization, irrespective of future management and events.Demographic and clinical variables will be summarized as means (SDs) for continuous and counts (percentages) for categorical variables. Comparisons across the groups will be performed using a 2-tailed unpaired t test for continuous variables and the Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables. A P value of less than 0.05 will be considered as statistically significant for all analyses.
Clinical events committee. All clinical events including myocardial infarction, stroke, target lesion revascularization, and death will undergo central adjudication by an independent clinical events committee (CEC).
Interventions
- Procedure Inferior part-sternotomy
A midline skin incision of 8 to 10cm in length is made over the sternum, starting from 2-3cm below the sternal angle inferiorly and extending slightly beyond the xiphoid process. A sternal saw is used to split the sternum from the xiphoid process to the second intercostal space where the sternum is partially transected by turning the saw rightward. - Procedure Full median sternotomy
A midline skin incision is made over the sternum, starting from the sternal angle and extending slightly beyond the xiphoid process. The sternum is fully split by a sternal saw.
Primary outcome measures
- Complete revascularization rate immediately after surgery [Time frame: Immediately after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
- The harvest time of left Internal mammary artery (LIMA) [Time frame: During surgery]
- Aortic cross-clamp time [Time frame: During surgery]
- Overall operation time [Time frame: During surgery]
- Intraoperative real-time blood flow at each anastomosis [Time frame: During surgery]
- The total amount of postoperative chest tube drainage [Time frame: Up to 4 weeks]
- The graft patency rate by CTA at 5-7 days, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery [Time frame: 1week after the surgery;10 years after surgery]
- The rate of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 5-7 days, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after surgery [Time frame: 1week after the surgery;10 years after surgery]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Patients who undergo primary isolated open-chest CABG with multi-vessel coronary disease(left main artery disease with right coronary artery disease,or three-vessel disease)
Exclusion criteria
- Single vessel disease, double vessel disease, left main artery disease without right coronary artery disease.
- Concomitant cardiac surgeries(i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery, left ventricular repair due to ventricular aneurysm).
- Redo CABG.
- Emergent CABG.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction(EF≤35%).
- Severe atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta.
- Subjects tend to choose surgical approach (via full median sternotomy/inferior part-sternotomy) .
- Malignant tumor or other severe systemic diseases.
- Severe renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine >200 μmol/L).
- Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer.
- Participant of other ongoing clinical trials.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurhear PMID 30165437
- Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Oct;40(4):804-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.066. Epub 2011 Mar 9. PMID 21393011
- Ong AT, Serruys PW. Complete revascularization: coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2006 Jul 18;114(3):249-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.614420. No abstract available. PMID 16847164
- Veiga Oliveira P, Madeira M, Ranchordas S, Marques M, Almeida M, Sousa-Uva M, Abecasis M, Neves JP. Complete surgical revascularization: Different definitions, same impact? J Card Surg. 2021 Dec;36(12):4497-4502. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15986. Epub 2021 Sep 16. PMID 34533240
- Sohn SH, Kang Y, Kim JS, Paeng JC, Hwang HY. Impact of Functional vs Anatomic Complete Revascularization in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Apr;115(4):905-912. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.10.029. Epub 2022 Nov 9. PMID 36334649
- Sun HS, Ma WG, Xu JP, Sun LZ, Lu F, Zhu XD. Minimal access heart surgery via lower ministernotomy: experience in 460 cases. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2006 Apr;14(2):109-13. doi: 10.1177/021849230601400206. PMID 16551816
- Kleisli T, Cheng W, Jacobs MJ, Mirocha J, Derobertis MA, Kass RM, Blanche C, Fontana GP, Raissi SS, Magliato KE, Trento A. In the current era, complete revascularization improves survival after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jun;129(6):1283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.034. PMID 15942568
- Ju F, Li B, Wu H, Sun H. Achieving completed revascularization via inferior mini-sternotomy versus conventional median sternotomy for CABG in patients with multivessel CAD (the ACRIS-MICABG trial): Rationale and design of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Aug;167:108362. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108362. Epub 2026 Jun 11. PMID 42276410
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05835167 · 2022-GSP-GG-23