Distal Femur Fx: ORIF(Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) vs DFR (Distal Femur Replacement Total Knee Arthroplasty)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures, Koos Jr assesment on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures, Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture, Koos Jr assesment on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Distal Femur Fracture. Basic parameters: 55 years — 100 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Evaluation of the Management of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures and Native Knee Distal Femur Fractures, Comparing Open Reduction Internal Fixation With Distal Femur Replacement, a Prospective Cohort Study
Overview
Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score)
Detailed description
Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). Several small retrospective studies have compared outcomes with mixed results. To the authors' knowledge there are no prospective studies evaluating the outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score).
Interventions
- Other Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures
Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair. Test - Other Koos Jr assesment on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures
Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems. - Other Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture
Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair. Test - Other Koos Jr assesment on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture
Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems.
Primary outcome measures
- Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fracture [Time frame: Up to 2 years]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fracture [Time frame: Up to 2 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- English speaking patients
- 55 years or older with Su Type II or Su Type III periprosthetic femur fractures or OTA/OA 33C or 338/3 native knee distal femur fracturing requiring surgical intervention and are medically fit to undergo surgical intervention
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with an active total knee prosthetic infection
- Patients unable to undergo surgical intervention
- Patient with an open fracture
- Non-English-speaking patients
- Oncologic/pathologic fracture
- Poly-trauma patient (or other associated major orthopaedic injuries)
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- UF & Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute — Gainesville
Publications
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222. PMID 17403800
- Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617. PMID 30180053
- Hart GP, Kneisl JS, Springer BD, Patt JC, Karunakar MA. Open Reduction vs Distal Femoral Replacement Arthroplasty for Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures in the Patients 70 Years and Older. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 23. PMID 27449717
- Wadhwa H, Salazar BP, Goodnough LH, Van Rysselberghe NL, DeBaun MR, Wong HN, Gardner MJ, Bishop JA. Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141. PMID 34001801
- Darrith B, Bohl DD, Karadsheh MS, Sporer SM, Berger RA, Levine BR. Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior? J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID 31924488
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05792189 · IRB202300246