Menu
Recruiting NCT05722197

Assessment of Emotion Regulation Strategies Used When Suicidal

No phase Interventional Suicidal Ideation Treatment Refusal Emotion Regulation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Crisis Response Planning and Lethal Means Safety Counseling.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Suicidal Ideation, Treatment Refusal, Emotion Regulation. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Real-Time Assessment of Emotion Regulation Strategies Used by Suicidal Military Personnel

Overview

Crisis Response Planning is an efficacious, one-session intervention that increases positive affect, decreases negative affect and psychiatric hospitalizations, and reduces suicide attempts by 76% among Servicemembers. Crisis Response Planning is hypothesized to reduce suicidality by identifying a variety of personalized strategies that are designed to strengthen and/or promote emotion regulation processes.Research in nonmilitary samples suggests the effectiveness of emotion regulation strategies varies across situations. The applicability of these findings to suicidality among Servicemembers is unknown. Improved understanding of what strategies work under which circumstances and for whom will significantly advance our ability to prevent suicide among Servicemembers. Hypotheses include: 1. Use of self-management strategies, thinking about reasons for living, and seeking social support at time t will be associated with significant reductions in suicidal ideation at time t+1. 2. Use of distraction, reappraisal, and interpersonal emotion regulation strategies at time t will be associated with significant reductions in suicidal ideation at time t+1. 3. Affect intensity and social context will significantly moderate the time-lagged effects of Crisis Response Planning and emotion regulation strategy use on suicidal ideation. 4. Distinct profiles of demographic (e.g., gender, age), historical (e.g., prior suicide attempts), and psychological characteristics (e.g., emotion dysregulation, symptom severity) will predict who experiences a decrease in suicidal ideation following the use of Crisis Response Planning and emotion regulation strategies. 5. (Exploratory): Individuals who utilize their Crisis Response Planning more frequently and perceive Crisis Response Planning as more effective will be more likely to engage in mental health treatment at follow-up.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Crisis Response Planning and Lethal Means Safety Counseling
    Crisis Response Planning is an efficacious, one-session intervention that increases positive affect, decreases negative affect and psychiatric hospitalizations, and reduces suicide attempts by 76% among Servicemembers

Primary outcome measures

  • Suicidal Ideation - Ecological Momentary Assessment [Time frame: Change over 28 consecutive days]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Scale for Suicide Ideation [Time frame: baseline, 1,2,3,6,9, and 12 months after baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently serving in any Branch or Component of the U.S. military
  • >18 years old;
  • Score ≥ 5 on the Scale for Suicidal Ideation and/or endorse a suicide attempt, aborted attempt, or interrupted attempt within the past month on the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised (SITBI-R)
  • Ability and willingness to complete research-related activities remotely
  • Regular access to an Android or Apple smartphone that is compatible with the ecological momentary assessment application

Exclusion criteria

  • Engagement in mental health treatment within the past year (including taking psychotropic medications)
  • A psychiatric or medical condition that preventing providing informed consent or from participating in the treatments (e.g., psychosis, mania, acute intoxication); or - Expecting to separate from the military within 90 days

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center — Columbus

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05722197 · 2022H0155

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗