Menu
Recruiting NCT05651295

A Precision Medicine Approach to Target Engagement for Emotion Regulation

No phase Interventional Emotional Regulation Depression Anxiety Borderline Personality Disorder

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Checking the Facts, Opposite to Emotion Action, Mindfulness of Current Emotions.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Emotional Regulation, Depression, Anxiety, Borderline Personality Disorder. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The proposed study is designed to first test whether teaching people personalized or standardized emotion regulation skills leads to greater decreases in daily negative emotion intensity. Second, using data from an initial sample, the investigators will prospectively assign an independent sample of participants to receive their predicted optimal or non-optimal skills to determine if it is feasible and efficacious to match participants to the most appropriate training condition. Results of these studies may identify the mechanisms by which emotion regulation interventions impact emotional functioning and allow for the development of personalized, evidence-based, and scalable emotion regulation interventions.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Checking the Facts
    Checking the Facts is a form of cognitive reappraisal in which participants identify negatively-valenced automatic thoughts and both generate and consider evidence that challenges the validity of those thoughts.
  • Behavioral Opposite to Emotion Action
    Opposite to Emotion Action teaches participants to identify their momentary emotion(s), identify the associated behavioral urge(s), and implement a behavior inconsistent with that urge (e.g., approaching a feared stimulus instead of avoiding it).
  • Behavioral Mindfulness of Current Emotions
    Mindfulness of Current Emotions teaches participants to nonjudgmentally observe the experience of their emotions, including physiological and cognitive responses to those emotions.

Primary outcome measures

  • Changes in Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Short Form [Time frame: 7 times per day for 42 days]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
  • Changes in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [Time frame: Once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (4 times total)]
  • Changes in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [Time frame: Once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (4 times total)]
  • Changes in Five-Factor Model Score Sheet [Time frame: Once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (4 times total)]
  • Changes in Ways of Responding Scale [Time frame: Once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (4 times total)]
  • Changes in Opposite to Emotion Action Task [Time frame: Once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (4 times total)]
  • Changes in Breath-Counting Task [Time frame: Once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (4 times total)]
  • Changes in emotion regulation effectiveness [Time frame: 7 times per day for 48 days]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Elevated emotion dysregulation

Exclusion criteria

  • Lack of proficiency in English
  • No access to smartphone
  • Conditions requiring greater than outpatient care

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Ohio State University — Columbus

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05651295 · 2024B0416 · K23MH126211

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗