Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT05641987

Effectiveness of the Educator Well-being Program

No phase Interventional Participatory Action Research Occupational Health Educator Well-being Employee Health

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Healthy Workplace Participatory Program.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Participatory Action Research, Occupational Health, Educator Well-being, Employee Health. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Official title

CPH-NEW IV - Total Worker Health - Total Teacher Health

Overview

Using a stepped wedge design (prospective cohort with concurrent controls) among six paired, elementary schools, investigators will implement and evaluate the Educator Well-being Program. The investigators will evaluate whether the process improves organizational-level factors, teacher mental well-being (stress, depression and anxiety symptoms).

Interventions

  • Behavioral Healthy Workplace Participatory Program
    The Center for the Promotion of Health in the New England Workplace's (CPH-NEW's) Healthy Workplace Participatory Program (HWPP) is a participatory process in which end-users design TWH interventions that simultaneously change organizational and individual behavior to improve the health, safety and well-being of their workforce. The HWPP uses a process to empower workers to identify the root causes of health and safety concerns and then design, implement and evaluate interventions to address tho

Primary outcome measures

  • Work Stress [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later]
  • Perceived Stress [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later]
  • Anxiety Symptoms [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later]
  • Depression Symptoms [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later]
  • Well-being [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later]
  • Burnout (Emotional Exhaustion) [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later]
  • Burnout (Personal Accomplishment) [Time frame: Frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later]
  • Burnout (Depersonalization) [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later]
  • Work-life conflict [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later]
  • Intention to Turnover [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 year later]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Change in Team Attendance [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two years]
  • Change in Team Engagement [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two years]
  • Change in Level of Committee Activity [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two years]
  • Change in team-selected health/safety/well-being issue [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two years]
  • Proportion of content followed according to the Educator Well-being Program protocol [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two years]
  • Supportive School Climate [Time frame: Prior to random selection of immediate and delayed intervention site, and 1 years later]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • All staff aged 18 years or older at the time of survey administration within the three school districts will be eligible for participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • None.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • UConn Health — Farmington

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05641987 · 22-123S-2 · 1 U19OH012299-01-00 · 1U19OH012299-01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗