Menu
Recruiting NCT05625724

Aspirin for the Prevention of Preeclampsia and Pregnancy Outcomes After Assisted Reproductive Technology

Phase III Interventional ART Pre-Eclampsia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Aspirin, Placebo.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: ART, Pre-Eclampsia. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Aspirin for the Prevention of Preeclampsia and Pregnancy Outcomes in Nulliparous Women After Assisted Reproductive Technology. APPART

Overview

This study seeks to validate the hypothesis that nulliparous pregnant women after Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) are at high risk of preeclampsia and perinatal complications and represent a subgroup for which aspirin prophylaxis during pregnancy may be effective in the prevention of preterm preeclampsia and other perinatal adverse outcomes.

Detailed description

Preeclampsia (PE) affects 2% of pregnancies in France and is an important cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Aspirin is currently the only prophylactic therapy for PE in high-risk women when initiated before 16 weeks of gestation and at a daily dose of 100-160 mg, with a reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia of 60-70% in recent meta-analysis. Latest data also demonstrate a potential beneficial effect of aspirin on spontaneous preterm birth. A major challenge in modern obstetrics is early identification of pregnant women at high-risk of PE who could benefit from aspirin treatment. In France, the College National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français and the Société Française d'HyperTension Artérielle have restrictive recommendation of aspirin to be prescribed only to women with a history of PE or vascular intra-uterine growth restriction, thus leaving out all nulliparous women (including those with multiple risk factors). Other countries (USA, United Kingdom (UK), Canada) have much broader recommendations with aspirin prescription for patients with one high or 2 moderate risk factors, but exposing nearly 30% of pregnant women to aspirin (leading to unnecessary exposure to treatment). The Fetal Medicine Foundation provides a screening test combining clinical parameters, uterine artery Doppler, and biomarkers; but this strategy has high false-positive rate and the reproducibility needs to be confirmed in clinical practice.

It seems necessary to be able to better target women at risk, especially in nulliparous women. Nulliparity and assisted reproductive technology (ART) are independent risk factors for PE. Currently the proportion of pregnancy after ART in France is roughly 6.9% and is rising. Nulliparous ART pregnant women have a higher risk of PE and preterm birth. Indeed, they commonly cumulate risk factors including age\>35years in association with nulliparity and ART. The rate of PE in this population can rise up to 10%.

Our hypothesis is that nulliparous pregnant women after ART are at high risk of preeclampsia and perinatal complications and represent a subgroup for which aspirin prophylaxis during pregnancy may be effective in the prevention of preterm preeclampsia and other perinatal adverse outcomes.

Interventions

  • Drug Aspirin
    Experimental drug administrated orally
  • Drug Placebo
    Treatment for the control group

Primary outcome measures

  • Effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo in the prevention of preterm (<37 weeks of gestation) preeclampsia [Time frame: Up to 9 months]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on spontaneous and total preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation [Time frame: Up to 8 months]
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on spontaneous and total preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation [Time frame: Up to 9 months]
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on occurrence of preeclampsia <34 weeks of gestation, term preeclampsia (≥ 37 weeks of gestation) [Time frame: Up to 8 months]
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on occurrence of cesarean delivery [Time frame: Up to 9 months]
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage (>500ml) [Time frame: Up to 9 months]
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on occurrence of placental abruption [Time frame: Up to 9 months]
  • Compare the effect of aspirin 150mg daily initiated between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation versus placebo on neonatal adverse outcome. [Time frame: Up to 9 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparous women aged 18 years or more
  • Pregnancy following ART, including in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte donation or intrauterine insemination with sperm donor
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Evolutive pregnancy between 9 and 14 weeks of gestation
  • Women affiliated to a French Social Security Insurance or equivalent social protection
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Major fetal abnormality
  • Regular treatment with aspirin (including antiphospholipid syndrome)
  • Aspirin contraindications (allergy, von Willebrand disease, peptic ulceration, hemophilia)
  • Women protected by law.
  • Women included in another interventional study.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

France · 21 centers
  • CHU Angers — Angers
  • CHU Bordeaux — Bordeaux
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand — Clermont-Ferrand
  • CHU Dijon-Bourgogne — Dijon
  • CHU Lille — Lille
  • HCL - Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant — Lyon
  • AP-HM Hôpital de la Conception — Marseille
  • AP-HM Hôpital Nord — Marseille
  • … and 13 more centers

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05625724 · RC31/21/0337

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗