Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT05612828

The Efficacy of Simulation Manikins in the Military Medics Training

No phase Interventional War-Related Injuries

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Conventional versus simulation manikin training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: War-Related Injuries. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Czechia
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The aim of the study is to verify the applicability of simulation manikin in combat training of military medics. The research will be conducted on healthy volunteers - medics of the Czech Armed Forces, as a part of the compulsory medical courses required for foreign military missions as a "Combat Life Saver". Comparison of the performance of two groups of course participants who were trained using the standard approach versus experiential learning using simulation manikins.

Detailed description

With the development of modern hi-tech manikins and their growing popularity in the training of "civilian" medics, the possibilities of their application in the training of military medics are emerging. The aim of the study is to verify the applicability of simulation manikin in combat training of military medics. The research will be conducted on healthy volunteers - medics of the Czech Armed Forces, as a part of the compulsory medical courses required for foreign military missions as a "Combat Life Saver". Comparison of the performance of two groups of course participants who were trained using the standard approach versus experiential learning using simulation manikins. In addition to monitoring the particular professional performance of the trainees, changes in basic physiological functions, including the endocrinological response to stress conditions, will be evaluated.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Conventional versus simulation manikin training
    Two approaches to training Combat Life Savers will be employed and performance of participants will be evaluated.

Primary outcome measures

  • Duration time of the of use of tourniquet [Time frame: 10 minutes]
  • Correctness of treatment of severe bleeding [Time frame: 10 minutes]
  • Duration time of the of use of nasal airway [Time frame: 10 minutes]
  • Correctness of treatment of airway obstruction [Time frame: 10 minutes]
  • Duration time of the use of chest seal [Time frame: 10 minutes]
  • Correctness of treatment of open pneumothorax [Time frame: 10 minutes]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Stress level 1 [Time frame: 1 hour]
  • Stress level 2 [Time frame: 1 hour]
  • Stress level 3 [Time frame: 1 hour]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • active soldier during the Tactical Combat Casualty Care course

Exclusion criteria

  • not willing to participate

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Health services research

Study locations

Czechia · 1 center
  • Czech Technical University in Prague — Kladno

Publications

  • McCarthy M. US military revamps combat medic training and care. Lancet. 2003 Feb 8;361(9356):494-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12494-4. No abstract available. PMID 12583953

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05612828 · VentRes-2022-01-JP

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗