Clinical Prognostic Score to Predict Relapse in VL
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: No intervention.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Visceral Leishmaniasis. Basic parameters: from 12 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Ethiopia
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comprehensive Clinical and Laboratory Assessment of Visceral Leishmaniasis to Develop Clinical Prognostic Tools to Predict Relapse: a Prospective Cohort Study in Ethiopia
Overview
This prospective cohort study has the aim to develop a prognostic tool to predict relapse in patients suffering from visceral leishmaniasis (VL) from VL endemic regions in Ethiopia. Therefore, comprehensive clinical and laboratory characterization of all confirmed VL patients before and during treatment will be performed in order to identify the factors that determine prognosis of the patients. This approach would result in more efficient patient care and would reduce the case fatality and morbidity, and improve follow-up and care for those at risk of VL relapse.
Detailed description
Certain patient groups seem to be at higher risk of poor outcomes. Although the average case fatality rate was \<10% in Ethiopia , certain subgroups of VL patients are at significantly higher risk of dying, with case fatality rates as high as 39% when patients coinfected with HIV or sepsis. The host's immunocompetence appears to play a critical factor associated with disease development, severity, treatment success and disease relapse. Yet, a substantial group of immunocompetent patients also fail to respond well to treatment, or develop relapse after cure. Relapse is increasingly recognized as an important clinical challenge, with 10-15% estimated to develop relapse in the Ethiopian setting. Understanding which factors determine prognosis among VL patients is key in improving outcomes, as high-risk patients can be identified and receive additional monitoring, care, investigations or preferential treatment with safer or more effective drugs.
One of the strategies to improve patient outcome is identification of factors that determine the prognosis of a patient. These factors can be used in clinical decision tools to provide the most appropriate care for each patient. With the key prognostic factors, patients can be stratified in high and low risk of relapse, treatment failure and mortality and can be treated accordingly, providing intensive monitoring and/or treatment of comorbidities of high-risk patients and a more decentralized follow-up for low-risk patients. This approach would result in more efficient patient care and would reduce the case fatality and morbidity, and improve follow-up and care for those at risk of VL relapse.
No clinical tools for prediction of relapse and treatment failure currently exist. The existing clinical tools for predicting mortality developed so far have a fair accuracy but these tools could further be improved by using prognostic markers both before and during treatment and including more relevant parameters which were previously ignored, such as more laboratory parameters including coagulation profile, blood culture, immunological markers and more relevant clinical parameters such as sepsis and comorbidities.
This study will perform a comprehensive clinical and laboratory characterization of all confirmed VL patients before and during treatment with the main objective to develop a prognostic tool for unfavorable outcome among hospitalized patients. It is planned to develop tools of different complexity, geared towards the capacity of the health facility and also study the added effect of each variable in the tool. The data from this study will address a number of outstanding unanswered questions that could help to improve or standardize VL management.
Interventions
- Other No intervention
No intervention
Primary outcome measures
- Identification of risk factors for relapse [Time frame: December 2026]
- Prognostic tool for relapse [Time frame: December 2026]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- Patterns in host immune markers for VL relapse, treatment failure and death [Time frame: December 2026]
- Identification of risk factors for treatment failure [Time frame: December 2026]
- Identification of risk factors for death [Time frame: December 2026]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- clinically or parasitologically confirmed VL
Exclusion criteria
- Age under 12 years
- VL patients already on treatment for 3 days or more
- Severe critical condition or other circumstances that make the study medically inadvisable
- Unlikely to adhere to follow up visits during the study period (e.g. patients who live or work very far away) AND not reachable by phone for follow-up information
- Pregnant or lactating woman
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Ethiopia · 1 center
- University of Gondar — Gonder
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05602610 · 1544/21