Menu
Recruiting NCT05571722

Linezolid or Vancomycin Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis

Phase IV Interventional Antibiotic Prophylaxis General Surgery

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Vancomycin Injection, Linezolid Injection.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Antibiotic Prophylaxis, General Surgery. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Anesthesia and surgical guidelines recommend the administration of a surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing "clean" surgery. The prescribed antibiotic should target the bacteria most commonly found in surgical site infections (SSIs) and the duration of administration should not exceed 24 hours to minimize the ecological risk of bacterial resistance emergence. Guidelines provide a framework for the administration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis but their effectiveness is regularly re-evaluated by measuring the rates of SSIs and the microorganisms responsible for infectious complications after surgery. The majority of interventions required the use of first or second generation cephalosporins as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. For patients with allergy to beta-lactams, clindamycin and vancomycin are proposed as alternatives. In the patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization or if those at risk of developing MRSA-associated SSI (hospital ecology, previous antibiotic treatment), only vancomycin is recommended. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is complex and its tissue absorption varies according to the level of tissue inflammation. This is a difficult molecule to handle, exclusively administered via intravenous route. Linezolid is a synthetic antibiotic from the oxazolidinone class. By binding to the rRNA on the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits, it inhibits the bacterial synthesis. It is therefore a bacteriostatic antibiotic approved for the treatment of both methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA infections. It also covers a broad spectrum of Gram positive bacteria. Its pharmacokinetics allows rapid intravenous infusion, with rapid penetration into bone and soft tissue of the surgical site during hip surgery. A large Cochrane meta-analysis reported that linezolid was superior to vancomycin in skin infections, including MRSA infections, albeit with low quality evidence. We therefore hypothesized that linezolid can be used instead of vancomycin for beta-lactam allergic patients and patients at risk of MRSA-associated SSI in general surgery.

Detailed description

Anesthesia and surgical guidelines recommend the administration of a surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing "clean" surgery. The prescribed antibiotic should target the bacteria most commonly found in surgical site infections (SSIs) and the duration of administration should not exceed 24 hours to minimize the ecological risk of bacterial resistance emergence.

Surgical site infections are devastating complications occurring after surgery. They can lead to prolonged and burdensome duration of hospitalization, resulting in impaired outcomes and additional costs.

Many infections are associated with Gram positive bacteria, mainly Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus spp with negative coagulase. Large European cohorts reported that less than 10% of SSIs were associated with Gram negative bacteria, justifying the use of 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporin, clindamycin and vancomycin as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Guidelines provide a framework for the administration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis but protocols are discussed at the local level with an agreement between surgeons, anesthesiologists, infectious diseases specialists, microbiologists and pharmacists. They are subject to economic analyses, including head-to-head comparisons of different options. Their effectiveness is regularly re-evaluated by measuring the rates of SSIs and the microorganisms responsible for infectious complications after surgery.

The majority of interventions required the use of first or second generation cephalosporins as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. For patients with allergy to beta-lactams, clindamycin and vancomycin are proposed as alternatives. In the patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization or if those at risk of developing MRSA-associated SSI (hospital ecology, previous antibiotic treatment), only vancomycin is recommended. Actually, clindamycin was found to be less effective than beta-lactams or vancomycin in reducing the risk of SSI; the reported odds ratios (OR) for SSIs as compared to cefazolin range from an OR of 1.38 (95%CI 1.11 to 1.71) to OR 3.45 (95% CI 1.84 to 6.47).

Vancomycin is a large glycopeptide molecule, effective against a wide variety of Gram positive bacteria. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of vancomycin is complex, involving multicompartmental models. Its tissue absorption varies according to the level of tissue inflammation. It is exclusively administered via intravenous route. This is a difficult molecule to handle: specific international guidelines for its management have been published. In surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, French guidelines recommend a single loading dose infusion of vancomycin. It is recommended that loading doses of vancomycin should be administered as a low-rate infusion to mitigate infusion-related adverse events such as red-man syndrome (rate of 10-15 mg/min representing ≥1 hour for 1000 mg). Despite decades of use, vancomycin dosing regimens are still debated. Vancomycin dosing is commonly based on the actual patient body weight, although the volume of distribution of vancomycin is not proportional to weight. Therefore, as loading dose should lead to a rapid attainment of therapeutic concentrations, high doses (30 mg/kg) have been proposed for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis with a capping threshold of 2000 mg to avoid overdosing and risk of acute renal failure. These doses rapidly achieve the area under the curve (AUC) over the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (AUC/MIC) targets, assuming a MIC ≤1mg/L for MRSA. Such high doses require prolonged infused time (at least two hours) and the administration should be terminated 30 minutes prior to surgery. This recommendation can lead to suboptimal administration times, delays in surgery and may also preclude the use of vancomycin in outpatient surgery. A U.S cohort reported that vancomycin was administered in 64% of cases outside national and institutional standards and incomplete administration of vancomycin has been associated with higher rates of SSI. Furthermore, in a nationwide US sample published, half of the patients receiving vancomycin were underdosed, which was associated with an increased risk of SSI.

Linezolid is a synthetic antibiotic from the oxazolidinone class. By binding to the rRNA on the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits, it inhibits the bacterial synthesis. It is therefore a bacteriostatic antibiotic approved for the treatment of both methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA infections. It also covers a broad spectrum of Gram positive bacteria. Its pharmacokinetics allows rapid intravenous infusion, with achievement of peak plasma concentrations within 30 minutes. Linezolid has also been shown to penetrate rapidly into bone and soft tissue of the surgical site during hip surgery. A large Cochrane meta-analysis reported that linezolid was superior to vancomycin in skin infections, including MRSA infections, albeit with low quality evidence.

We therefore hypothesized that linezolid can be used instead of vancomycin for beta-lactam allergic patients and patients at risk of MRSA-associated SSI in general surgery.

Interventions

  • Drug Vancomycin Injection
    Patients receive a dose of 30 mg/kg of vancomycin (2 hours infusion) starting 2.5 hours before the scheduled time of surgical incision as defined in the French guidelines.
  • Drug Linezolid Injection
    Patients receive a dose of 1200 mg of linezolid (30 minutes infusion) 30 minutes before the scheduled time of surgical incision.

Primary outcome measures

  • Comparaison of the rates of SSIs in patients receiving vancomycin 30 mg/kg versus patients receiving linezolid 1200 mg as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for all types of surgery [Time frame: Day 30 after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (9)
  • Assessment of SSIs rates in all patients after 365 days [Time frame: 365 after surgery]
  • Comparaison of treatment compliance [Time frame: Day-365]
  • Number of days from hospital admission to surgery, from surgery to discharge, from inclusion to discharge [Time frame: Day-365]
  • Mortality rates In-hospital, at day-30, at day-90 and at day-365; [Time frame: day-30, at day-90 and at day-365]
  • Antibiotic-free days during the 30-days following surgery [Time frame: Day-30]
  • Rates of Gram positive and Gram negative infections of any sites requiring antibiotic treatments [Time frame: Day-365]
  • Rates of MSSA and MRSA infections [Time frame: Day-365]
  • Preference-based utility score [Time frame: Day-365]
  • Total costs of care during the 30-day study period and associated costs over the 365-day study period in all patients; [Time frame: 30-Day and 365-day]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing any elective surgery for which vancomycin is recommended in the guidelines as an alternative to beta-lactams including: neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, orthopedic surgery, vascular surgery, penile and testicular surgery, gastric banding procedure in digestive surgery.

This inclusion criteria can lead to the inclusion of patients who undergo a re-intervention provided that the re-intervention is not due to a suspected or proven infection and that the patient was not included in LOVip at the time of his/her first intervention;

  • Age ≥ 18 years-old;
  • Known allergy to beta-lactams AND/OR suspected or proven MRSA colonization. Proven MRSA colonization is defined as a positive patient sample (any type of swab or biological fluid) for MRSA within 3 months prior to surgery. MRSA colonization is suspected when the patient undergoing surgery has received antibiotic treatment within 3 months prior to surgery or is undergoing re-intervention more than 5 days after the first surgery. MRSA is defined as a strain of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin or cefoxitin, predicting non-susceptibility to all classes of beta-lactam antimicrobials (except anti-MRSA cephalosporins) (6). In contrast, MSSA is defined as an oxacillin sensitive strain of Staphylococcus aureus;
  • Informed consent of the patient;
  • Affiliated to a social security system or equivalent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Surgery for suspected or proven SSI (definition of SSI provided on chapter 3.6.1 Primary endpoint as defined by (5, 7)) according to international definitions;
  • Obesity defined by a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2 or a body weight > 100 kg;
  • Chronic kidney disease defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min per 1.73m2;
  • Known allergy to linezolid or vancomycin;
  • Hematologic malignancy;
  • Declared pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Patient under legal protection regime for adults;
  • Patient denying consent;
  • Patient already included in LOVip for a previous surgery.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Anesthésie Réanimation - Hôpital Nord (AP-HM) — Marseille

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05571722 · RCAPHM22_0233

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗