Menu
Recruiting NCT05546307

Interest of Prior Relaxation on the Recordings of the SomatoSensory Evoked Potentials

No phase Interventional Relaxation Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Patient Experience

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: SSEP, relaxation session.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Relaxation, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, Patient Experience. Basic parameters: 18 years — 70 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Randomized, Single-blind Study Evaluating the Interest of Prior Relaxation on the Quality of the Recordings of the SomatoSensory Evoked Potentials

Overview

Many factors influence the quality and duration of SomatoSensory Evoked potentials (SSEP). Some are related to the technique : type of electrodes, intensity of stimulation, stimulation site ; others are related to the patient : poor state of relaxation of the patient generating muscle artefacts; hypersensitivity of the patient to electrical stimuli making the examination unpleasant; examination time considered too long. However, the patient's relaxed state is essential to the quality of the signal . Thus the duration of an examination is very variable : between 30 and 75 minutes for the upper limbs.... For several months, the investigators provide relaxation to some patients just before the examination. Results seem to be positive. The investigators aim to study the effect of relaxation session on the quality of the SSEP recordings. Fifteen-minutes relaxation session will be provided by a nurse trained to the relaxation. The investigators will compare two groups : one group with one relaxation session before the examination and one group without relaxation session before the examination. The investigators chose to study the influence of relaxation session on (i) the artifacts rejection rate by the machine for the recordings of SSEP by stimulation of the median nerve to the upper limbs (ii) the duration of the examination (iii) the patient experience

Interventions

  • Other SSEP
    Every patient presenting for a SSEP will be offered to participate to the study. If accepted, a randomization will determine whether the examination will be preceded by a relaxation session (Relax Group) or not (control group)
  • Other relaxation session
    The relaxation session will be performed by one of the 5 nurses trained in relaxation

Primary outcome measures

  • Variation of average rate of automatized artifacts rejection between both groups [Time frame: 19 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Any patient addressed for a study of the somatosensory evoked potentials in upper limbs
  • Patients between 18 to 70 years old.
  • Patients able to understand the instructions of the relaxation session and the examination.
  • Patient providing informed consent exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • No availability of a technician trained in relaxation
  • Patient's refusal to participate in the protocol

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Amiens University Hospital — Amiens

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05546307 · PI2019_843_0079

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗