Menu
Recruiting NCT05487989

VIsual Pathways Model in Neuro-inflammatory Disorders

Observational Optic Neuritis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Clinical examen.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Optic Neuritis. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Study of the VIsual Pathways MODEL for a Better Understanding of Neurodegeneration in Inflammatory and Demyelinating Disorders of Central Nervous System

Overview

In neuroinflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and anti-MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), neuronal degeneration is the consequence of inflammatory and demyelinating lesions in the brain, optic nerve and spinal cord. Both white and grey matter are systematically affected. Lesions of the perivascular spaces containing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and meningeal inflammation seem to play an important role in the pathophysiology of these neuroinflammatory diseases. Currently, the interrelation of all these aspects is not clearly established in the pathophysiology of these diseases. In order to better understand the mechanisms that lead to and underlie the clinical disability of patients with these diseases, we need in vivo study models that allow the in-depth study of the neurodegenerative process and the identification of its causes. In this perspective, we make the hypothesis that the visual pathways model is very relevant to measure neuro-axonal loss and to explore the different mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration during MS and other CNS demyelinating diseases. Researchers have at their disposal many tools that allow them to analyse and quantify the neurodegenerative process in a reproducible and very precise manner from a structural and functional point of view, while taking into account possible vascular involvement (MRI, optical coherence tomography - angiography, etc…).

Interventions

  • Other Clinical examen
    MRI sequences for research, pupillometry, OCT-angiography, evaluation of visual cognition

Primary outcome measures

  • Presence of enhancement of the optic nerve sheath on the axial T1 dixon MRI sequence post gadolinium at the acute phase of optic neuritis. [Time frame: at inclusion]
  • Low contrast monocular visual acuity (2.5%, LogMAR unit) at distance from acute optic neuritis [Time frame: at 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Presence of enhancement of the optic nerve sheath on the axial T1 dixon MRI sequence post gadolinium. Macular GCIPL atrophy will be assessed by the variation of mGCIPL volume between inclusion and the maximal follow-up. [Time frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up]
  • Optic nerve lesion length on 3D-DIR sequence. Alteration of retinal microvascularisation between inclusion and the maximal follow-up. [Time frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up]
  • Acute alteration of retinal microvascularisation is assessed by the difference of retinal vascular density between inclusion (V0) and one month later (V1). [Time frame: at inclusion and at 1 months follow-up]
  • Low contrast monocular visual acuity (2.5%, LogMAR unit) measured at 12 months (V5) [Time frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up]
  • Amplitude of the melanopsin-mediated sustained constriction phase in the blue light-induced pupillary response is assessed at 12 months (V5). [Time frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up]
  • Optic nerve lesion length assessed at inclusion (V0) [Time frame: at inclusion]
  • mGCIPL atrophy/retinal vascular alteration are assessed by mGCIPL volume/retinal vessel density difference between inclusion (V0) and at 12 months (V5). [Time frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up]
  • Presence of leptomeningeal cerebral enhancement [Time frame: at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up]
  • T2 lesions brain and spinal cord volumes [Time frame: at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up]
  • Brain grey matter volumes and brain perfusion (3D-ASL) [Time frame: at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • \- Male or female
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Presenting a clinical picture of optic neuritis for less than 4 weeks, confirmed by neuro-ophthalmological assessment
  • Patient having given written consent to participate in the study
  • Patient with social insurance
  • Patient willing to comply with all study procedures and duration

Exclusion criteria

  • \- history of optic neuritis on the same side as the recent episode for which the patient is being treated
  • history of retinal pathology (retinal detachment, glaucoma, retinopathies, retinal surgery)
  • diabetes
  • chronic alcohol intoxication
  • contraindications to MRI
  • pregnant women
  • persons under protective supervision (ex : guardianship)
  • minors
  • persons deprived of their liberty
  • administrative reasons: inability to receive informed information, inability to participate in the entire study, lack of social security coverage, refusal to sign consent

A history of pre-existing CNS inflammatory demyelinating disease is not a criterion for non-inclusion.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Hop Fontan Chu — Lille

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05487989 · 2022_0289 · 2022-A01483-40

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗