Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Esophageal Lesion, Barrett Esophagus, Gastrointestinal Lesions. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in Western Population
Overview
This registry is to evaluate the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection. All patients will receive standard of medical care and no experimental interventions will be performed.
Detailed description
The technique of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) is currently widely used in the US to remove precancerous or cancerous lesions confined to the mucosa of the GI tract. EMR carries lower morbidity and mortality compare to surgery, at the expense of a higher rate of piecemeal removal, incomplete resection and cancer recurrence. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) is a newer technique developed in Japan that involves en-bloc resection of the entire lesion irrespective of size, allowing for a detailed analysis of the resected margins and depth of invasion and producing a lower local recurrence. Due to the lack of dedicated ESD devices the procedure has not been disseminated in Western countries. Recently the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a number of devices for ESD. The vast majority of studies evaluating the clinical outcomes from ESD are originating in Japan where the technique is mostly applied to patients with early gastric cancer (Japan has the highest incidence of gastric cancer in the word). In the US lesions that are currently treated with EMR are mostly located in the esophagus (Barrett esophagus) and colon (large adenomatous polyps and intramucosal cancer). These esophageal and colonic lesions can be treated with ESD with expected higher rate of en-block resection and lower recurrence rate compare to EMR. With the differences in patient population and disease location one can anticipate some differences in outcomes between ESD performed in Asian and US patients. Therefore, the investigator wants to prospectively record the experience with ESD done as part of routine medical care in United States (US) population. This will be a prospective data recording study. All patients will receive standard medical care and no experimental interventions will be performed.
Interventions
- Procedure Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an outpatient procedure to remove deep tumors from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract
Primary outcome measures
- Evaluate the utility of ESD for treatment of gastrointestinal lesions [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- En-Bloc Resection Rate [Time frame: 6 months]
- Complete Resection Rate [Time frame: 6 months]
- Curative Resection Rate [Time frame: 6 months]
- Safety- Adverse Events [Time frame: 12 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 18 years or older
- Scheduled to undergo ESD
Exclusion criteria
- Any contraindication to performing endoscopy
- Participation in another research protocol that could interfere or influence the outcomes measures of the present study.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- AdventHealth Orlando — Orlando
Publications
- Kotzev AI, Yang D, Draganov PV. How to master endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA. Dig Endosc. 2019 Jan;31(1):94-100. doi: 10.1111/den.13240. Epub 2018 Aug 22. PMID 30022521
- Yang D, Wagh MS, Draganov PV. The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1016-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.047. Epub 2020 Jun 3. PMID 32504699
- Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015 May;27(4):417-434. doi: 10.1111/den.1 PMID 25652022
- Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett's Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1019-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 26. PMID 30267866
- Yang D, Draganov PV. Expanding Role of Third Space Endoscopy in the Management of Esophageal Diseases. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;16(1):41-57. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0169-z. PMID 29435819
- Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, Mandolesi D, Farioli A, Cucchetti A, Frazzoni L, Bhandari P, Bellisario C, Bazzoli F, Repici A. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):74-86.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 28. PMID 28254526
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05468008 · 1798539