Menu
Recruiting NCT05465070

Leg Heat Therapy in Peripheral Artery Disease

No phase Interventional Peripheral Artery Disease

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Leg heat therapy, Sham Control.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Peripheral Artery Disease. Basic parameters: from 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Leg Heat Therapy to Improve Functional Performance in Peripheral Artery Disease

Overview

The goal of this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the benefits of home-based, leg heat therapy (HT) on lower-extremity functioning and quality of life in patients who suffer from lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). We will randomize 106 patients to one of two groups that either receive leg HT or a sham intervention. The primary study outcome is the change in 6-minute walk distance between baseline and the 12-week follow up. Secondary outcomes include changes in the short physical performance battery score, handgrip strength, quality of life (measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and Short-Form (SF)-36 Questionnaire), calf muscle strength (measured using a calf ergometer), size (measured by magnetic resonance imaging) and bioenergetics (assessed using phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy), and physical activity (measured by accelerometer).

Detailed description

The lack of accessible therapies amenable for application in the home setting is a major obstacle for treating patients who suffer from lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). The investigators will determine whether unsupervised, home-based leg heat therapy (HT) improves walking performance compared to a sham intervention. Leg HT will be applied using water-circulating trousers coupled with a water pump and a water heater. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: those receiving HT (n=53) or those receiving a sham treatment (n=53).The water heater and pump given to participants in the HT group will be adjusted to circulate water at 42ºC through the trousers. In the sham group, water at 33ºC will be circulated through the trousers. Participants will be asked to apply the therapy daily for 90 min for 3 consecutive months. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, at the completion of the intervention (end of week 12) and at a follow-up visit, 12 weeks after the end of the intervention (week 24). The primary study outcome is the change in 6-minute walk distance between baseline and the 12-week follow up. Secondary outcomes include changes in the short physical performance battery score, which combines performance in walking speed, standing balance, and repeated chair rises, changes in handgrip strength, perceived quality of life (measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire and Short-Form (SF)-36 Questionnaire), calf muscle strength (measured using a calf ergometer), size (measured by magnetic resonance imaging) and bioenergetics (assessed using phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy), and physical activity (measured by accelerometer).

Interventions

  • Device Leg heat therapy
    A sous vide heating immersion circulator heats up the water inside the water tank to 42ºC. A water pump circulates temperature-regulated water through the trousers.
  • Device Sham Control
    A sous vide heating immersion circulator heats up the water inside the water tank to 33ºC. A water pump circulates temperature-regulated water through the trousers.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in 6-minute walk distance [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) score [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in Short-Form (SF)-36 Questionnaire score [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in handgrip strength [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in systolic blood pressure [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in diastolic blood pressure [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in triceps surae volume [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in triceps surae intramuscular fat content [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in the time constant for phosphocreatine recovery after dynamic exercise [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]
  • Change in maximal plantar flexor strength [Time frame: Baseline to 3-month follow-up]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women older than 50 years
  • Resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.9 or less in at least one leg. Individuals with a resting ABI between 0.91 and 1.00 at baseline will be eligible if their ABI drops by 20% or greater following a heel-rise test.

Exclusion criteria

  • Critical limb ischemia (ischemic rest pain or ischemia-related, non-healing wounds or tissue loss)
  • Prior foot or leg amputation
  • Exercise tolerance limited by factors other than leg pain (e.g. angina, arthritis, severe lung disease, etc).
  • Recent (<3 months) lower-extremity revascularization or orthopedic surgery
  • Use of walking aid other than a cane
  • Active cancer
  • Chronic kidney disease (eGFR <30 by MDRD or Mayo or Cockcroft-Gault formula)
  • Class 2 or 3 obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2)
  • Unable to fit into water-circulating trousers
  • A Mini-Mental Status Examination score <23
  • Impaired thermal sensation in the leg

As this study involves MR imaging, patients that have contraindications to MRI will be included in the study but will not be allowed to participate in the MRI experiment. Information about biomedical devices that may pose a risk to patients undergoing MRI is available on the Internet at www.MRIsafety.com. These exclusions include: cardiac pacemaker, implanted cardiac defibrillator, aneurysm clips, carotid artery vascular clamp, neurostimulator, insulin or infusion pump, implanted drug infusion device, bone growth/fusion stimulator, cochlear, otologic, or ear implant and history of claustrophobia or who are unable to lie flat or who do not fit inside the bore of the scanner.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital — Indianapolis

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05465070 · 13615 · 1R01AG073634-01A1

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗