Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT05450237

Psychometric Evaluation in Patients With Brain Damage During Neuroinflammation

— Observational Multiple Sclerosis Epilepsy Parkinson Disease Dementia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Psychometric Evaluations.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Multiple Sclerosis, Epilepsy, Parkinson Disease, Dementia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Italy
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Overview

The presence of a damage to the central and / or peripheral nervous system resulting from diseases of a different nature (such as, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, head trauma, stroke, epilepsy or other neurological syndromes) is commonly cause of both physical than mental disability. The evaluation of certain domains may be more difficult so, specific assessment tools are necessary to analyze them.

Detailed description

The presence of a damage to the central and / or peripheral nervous system resulting from diseases of a different nature (such as, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, head trauma, stroke, epilepsy or other neurological syndromes) is commonly cause of both physical than mental disability. The presence of cognitive deficits in the sphere of memory or language is often evident at a first clinical examination. However, the evaluation of certain domains such as mood disorders, behavior, sleep-wake cycle or eating habits, may be less evident, even if they have a very strong impact on the quality of life of patients. Specific assessment tools are therefore needed such as psychometric tests, to collect information and analyze the results.

The main evaluation scales we will use are the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI II), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale- I (TAS-20), The fatigue severity scale (FSS), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQ1), The Multiple Sclerosis quality of life Inventory (MSQOLI), The work productivity and activity impairment instrument (WPAI), Frailty Index.

These rating scales will be administered in person, by telephone and / or by sending them electronically.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Psychometric Evaluations
    The main evaluation scales we will use are the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI II), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale- I (TAS-20), The fatigue severity scale (FSS), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (Johns MW. 1991), The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQ1), The Multiple Sclerosis quality of life Inventory (MSQOLI), The work productivity and activity impairme

Primary outcome measures

  • 500 patients will be enrolled in the study. The aim is to monitor over time items such as lifestyle indicators, cognitive, functional, emotional abilities and anxiety in patients with various types of neurological damage through use of evaluation scales. [Time frame: These scales will be administered after certain time intervals. The results obtained will be compared in other to highlight a variation in the scores in the various items.The duration of administration of the scales is approximately one hour.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of brain damage resulting from: Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, head trauma, neurosurgery, Stroke, Epilepsy or other neurological syndromes (for the experimental group only);
  • Be able to perform the tests to be administered for the duration of the study;
  • Patients must be able to follow protocol directions throughout the study;
  • Patients must be able to understand the purpose of the study;
  • Signature of informed consent, approved by our Ethics Committee.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability, even partial, to understand and want;
  • Patients with other pathologies that in the opinion of the scientific responsible prevent their recruitment

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Italy · 1 center
  • Ircss Neuromed — Pozzilli

Publications

  • Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1. PMID 8126686
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. PMID 2748771
  • Hobart J, Lamping D, Fitzpatrick R, Riazi A, Thompson A. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain. 2001 May;124(Pt 5):962-73. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.5.962. PMID 11335698
  • Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540. PMID 1798888
  • Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022. PMID 2803071
  • Larson RD. Psychometric properties of the modified fatigue impact scale. Int J MS Care. 2013 Spring;15(1):15-20. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-019. PMID 24453758
  • Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Aug 8;1:323-36. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2001.58. PMID 12806071
  • Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006. PMID 10146874

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05450237 · Punto 5 O.d.g. 30.06.2022

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗