Menu
Recruiting NCT05419492

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ETX101 in Infants and Children With SCN1A-Positive Dravet Syndrome

Phase I / Phase II Interventional Dravet Syndrome

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ETX101.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Dravet Syndrome. Basic parameters: 6 months — 17 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States, Australia, United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

ENDEAVOR: A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ETX101, an AAV9-Delivered Gene Therapy in Infants and Children With SCN1A-Positive Dravet Syndrome

Overview

ENDEAVOR is a Phase 1/2, 2-part, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ETX101 in participants with SCN1A-positive Dravet syndrome aged ≥6 to \<36 months (Part 1A), aged ≥48 months to \<18 years (Part 1B), and aged ≥6 to \<48 months (Part 2). Part 1A follows an open-label, dose-escalation design, Part 1B follows an open-label design, and Part 2 is a randomized, double-blind, sham delayed-treatment control study.

Interventions

  • Drug ETX101
    ETX101 is a non-replicating, recombinant adeno-associated viral vector serotype 9 (rAAV9) comprising a GABAergic regulatory element (reGABA) and an engineered transcription factor that increases transcription of the SCN1A gene (eTFSCN1A). ETX101 is intended as a one-time intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration.

Primary outcome measures

  • Percent change in monthly countable seizure frequency (MCSF) between the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period and the Post-Dosing Assessment Period. [Time frame: Between the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period and the Post-Dosing Assessment Period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52).]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Change from Baseline in Bayley-4 cognitive subdomain raw score at Week 52 (Key Secondary Endpoint for Part 2). [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Change from Baseline in Vineland-3 subdomain GSVs at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Change from Baseline in Bayley-4 subdomain GSVs at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Proportion of participants achieving ≥ 75% reduction in MCSF between the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period and the Post-Dosing Assessment Period. [Time frame: Between the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period and the Post-Dosing Assessment Period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52).]
  • Proportion of participants achieving ≥ 50% reduction in MCSF between the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period and the Post-Dosing Assessment Period. [Time frame: Between the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period and the Post-Dosing Assessment Period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52).]
  • Change from Baseline in the Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Composite standard score at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Change from Baseline in Vineland-3 subdomain raw scores at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Change from Baseline in Bayley-4 subdomain raw scores (excluding cognitive subdomain) at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Proportion of CGI-I responders, defined as participants with a CGI-I score of 1 (Very much improved) or 2 (Much improved), at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]
  • Proportion of CGI-S responders, defined as participants who either have a CGI-S score of 1 (Normal, not at all ill) or demonstrate a ≥2 point improvement from Baseline, at Week 52. [Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must be aged between ≥6 months and <36 months in Part 1A, ≥48 months and <18 years in Part 1B, ≥6 months and <48 months in Part 2.
  • Participant must have a predicted loss of function pathogenic or likely pathogenic SCN1A variant.
  • Participant must have experienced their first seizure between the ages of 3 and 15 months.
  • Participant must have a clinical diagnosis of Dravet syndrome or the treating clinician must have a high clinical suspicion of a diagnosis of Dravet syndrome.
  • Participant is receiving at least one prophylactic antiseizure medication.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant has another genetic mutation or clinical comorbidity which could potentially confound the typical Dravet phenotype.
  • Participant has a known central nervous system structural and/or vascular abnormality (indicated by an MRI or CT scan of the brain).
  • Participant has an abnormality that may interfere with CSF distribution and/or has an existing ventriculoperitoneal shunt.
  • Participant has received sodium channel blockers during the Pre-Dosing Seizure Period.
  • Participant has experienced seizure freedom for a period of 4 consecutive weeks within the 90-day period prior to informed consent.
  • Participant has previously received gene or cell therapy.
  • Participant is currently enrolled in a clinical trial or receiving an investigational therapy.
  • Participant has clinically significant underlying liver disease.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 11 centers
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals — San Francisco
  • Colorado Children's Hospital — Aurora
  • Nicklaus Children's Hospital — Miami
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — Chicago
  • Boston Children's Hospital — Boston
  • Mott Children's Hospital — Ann Arbor
  • Mayo Clinic — Rochester
  • Duke Children's Hospital & Health Center — Durham
  • … and 3 more centers
United Kingdom · 2 centers
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital — Glasgow
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital — London
Australia · 1 center
  • The Royal Children's Hospital — Melbourne

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05419492 · ETX-DS-002

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗