Imaging Versus Cardiac Biomarker Monitored HER2 Directed Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Biomarkers: Troponins and natriuretic peptides.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Cardiotoxicity, HER2-positive Breast Cancer. Basic parameters: 18 years — 90 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Denmark
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A National Randomized Non-inferiority Trial: Imaging Versus Cardiac Biomarker Monitored HER2 Directed Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
Overview
Due to a risk of heart failure during HER2 directed therapy in breast cancer, treatment is monitored with imaging of myocardial function, which is resource demanding for both patients and the health care system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate, if biomarkers can replace imaging based examinations of myocardial function during HER2 directed therapy.
Detailed description
About 15% of breast cancer tumors express the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), which is associated with a poor prognosis. Antibodies (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) directed against HER2 have in addition to traditional chemotherapy significantly improved survival in HER2 positive breast cancer, but induce a risk of left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Regular imaging based evaluation of myocardial function is therefore recommended during HER2 directed therapy by either an echocardiography or a MUGA scan, which is associated with radiation exposure. Both types of scans are resources demanding for both patients and the healthcare system, and since biomarkers have been proposed as another modality in assessment of myocardial injury, the purpose of this study is to evaluate, if biomarkers can replace imaging based examinations of myocardial function during HER2 directed therapy.
The study is designed as a national multicenter, randomized study, which will include Odense University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital and Aarhus University Hospital. It will be possible to include more sites.
Patients with localized HER2-positive breast cancer scheduled for HER2 proper therapy will be randomized 1: 1 to:
1. Standard imaging monitored treatment as recommended by DBCG guidelines with measurement of LVEF by MUGA scan or echocardiography in weeks 0, 9, 18, 30 and 48 of the treatment period. At each control visit, biomarkers are also taken, which are blinded until the end of the study. 2. Biomarker monitored treatment with measurement of NT-proBNP and cTNT / TNI in weeks 0, 9, 18, 30 and 48 of the treatment period. At each of these follow-up visits, MUGA scans or echocardiography are also performed, but the results are blinded to the staff responsible for treatment decisions.
In the group followed by standard imaging monitoring, cardiotoxicity will be managed according to standard clinical guidelines. Cardiotoxicity in the biomarker group will be suspected in case of a doubling of NT-proBNP from baseline (but minimum 125 pg / ml) and / or an increase in troponins to above 99th percentile. If these criteria are met, imaging is triggered, which in practice is a blinding of the result of the examination already performed.
The primary endpoint of the study is LVEF measured by cardiac MRI scan three months after completion of HER2-directed therapy.
Interventions
- Diagnostic test Biomarkers: Troponins and natriuretic peptides
Biomarker monitored treatment with measurement of NT-proBNP and cTNT / TNI in weeks 0, 9, 18, 30 and 48 of the treatment period.
Primary outcome measures
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [Time frame: Three months after treatment has ended.]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
- The number of treatment interruptions due to suspected cardiotoxicity [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.]
- The number of MUGA scans/echocardiograms [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.]
- The cumulative doses of trastuzumab and pertuzumab [Time frame: After end of treatment, an average of 1 year after inclusion.]
- The proportion of patients treated for cardiotoxicity. [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year]
- Change in self-reported health status measured with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire [Time frame: At baseline, at treatment week 9, 18, 30 and 48 and three months after end of treatment.]
- Correlation between radiotherapy and cardiac function. [Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients with non-metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer
- Scheduled for standard chemotherapy and HER2 directed therapy with trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab
- Age > 18 years
- Sinus rhythm on ECG
- NT-proBNP below125 pg/ml
- Troponin below threshold limit value
- LVEF > 55% by MUGA scan or an echocardiogram
Exclusion criteria
- Contra indications for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI)
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with FEV1 <80 % of predicted
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Denmark · 4 centers
- Aalborg University Hospital — Aalborg
- Rigshospitalet — Copenhagen
- Herlev University Hospital — Herlev
- Odense University Hospital — Odense
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05406635 · OP_1413