Menu
Recruiting NCT05335070

Reducing Pain From Wisdom Molar Extractions

Phase II Interventional Acute Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Temporo-masseteric Nerve Block.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Acute Pain. Basic parameters: 18 years — 64 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Non-randomized Prospective Pilot Study on Effect of Temporo-masseteric Nerve Block (TMNB) on Pain Reduction Following Wisdom Molar Extractions

Overview

This is a pilot study evaluating the ability of the Temporo-masseteric Nerve Block local anesthetic injection (this was called the Twin Block earlier) to reduce pain experienced by individuals undergoing removal of lower third molar(s) under intravenous sedation. Study participants will be queried for pain experience and pain medications taken during the first post-operative week and will present for a follow-up visit on Day 8.

Detailed description

Each year, over 3.5 million, mostly, healthy young adults, have their third molar teeth ('wisdom teeth') removed under sedation and are often given opioid prescriptions for managing their pain. Wisdom molar removal is one of the most common reasons for opioid prescriptions to be given to adolescents. There is a national thrust to reduce both the dose and the duration of such opioid prescriptions because even short-term opioid exposures increase risk for narcotic addiction and misuse. Non-opioid options to manage pain will still allow for sufficient pain control without risking addiction, and hence, a fundamental component of our response to combat the current national opioid crisis.

The investigators are going to study a promising option- the Temporo-masseteric Nerve Block (TMNB) dental anesthetic injection (This was called the Twin Block earlier). The TMNB involves injecting the standard dental numbing medication in a way that 'numbs' the 'jaw-clencher' muscles on the side of the face. The investigators found that the TMNB relieved jaw pain stemming from these muscles, in a quick and sustained manner, even in patients whose pain following wisdom tooth removal primarily came from 'taut' and tender jaw-clencher muscles.

In this pilot study, the investigators will deliver the Temporo-masseteric Nerve Block (TMNB) injection to 20 individuals (study participants) who undergo extraction of at least 1 lower wisdom molar dental extraction under intravenous sedation, on the side/s of lower molar removal at the end of the procedure. The participant's pain experience, medications taken for pain, as well as any adverse effects from either pain medications or the TMNB injection will be queried for a period of 1 week following the procedure (remotely). On Day 8 (one week after the procedure), the participants will return for a follow-up visit. The participants' pain experience will be compared with historical controls. This study can support a simple, safe and inexpensive means to reduce pain after a common procedure and will provide proof-of-concept for the potential non-opioid analgesic role of TMNB injection following wisdom molar removal.

The participant will be advised to take a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen (600 mg ibuprofen and 325 mg acetaminophen) every 4-6 hours for pain, unless it is mild, for which OTC strength analgesics would prove adequate (ibuprofen or acetaminophen). 5/300 mg hydrocodone with acetaminophen will be utilized for pain management if the patient's pain does not respond to 600 mg ibuprofen and 325 mg acetaminophen, even an hour after medication.

The key outcomes collected will include peak-pain by 4 hours post-procedure (measured using numerical pain rating scale score NRS, from 0-10, with 0 corresponding to no pain, 1-3 corresponding to mild, 4-6 to moderate and 7-10 to severe pain), passive mouth opening, masticatory muscle pain to palpation (masseter and temporalis muscles), total dosage of pain medication/s consumed. Adverse effects to pain medication consumption (nausea/ drowsiness/ gastritis etc) or to the TMNB injection will also be recorded. Daily pain experience will be recorded each of the 7 days post-operatively either as a survey emailed to the participant or queried over the phone by research personnel.

A week after the procedure, the participant will present for a post-operative evaluation. The extraction/s site/s will be evaluated for any infection/delayed healing.

Interventions

  • Drug Temporo-masseteric Nerve Block
    Following lower third molar extraction under intravenous sedation, the patient will receive the TMNB local anesthetic nerve block using the standard dental local anesthetic, i.e,. 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine on the side/s of the lower wisdom molar (third molar) extraction/s

Primary outcome measures

  • Peak post-operative Pain Score [Time frame: up to 4 hours on day of procedure, post-procedure]
  • Mean Numerical Pain Rating Scale pain score [Time frame: One week]
  • Passive Mouth opening [Time frame: Baseline, post-procedure (Day 1) and at post-operative visit (Day 8)]
  • Masticatory muscle pain to palpation- Temporalis and Masseter [Time frame: Baseline, post-procedure (Day 1) and at post-operative visit (Day 8)]
  • Total dose of pain medication- acetaminophen, ibuprofen and hydrocodone [Time frame: 8 Days]
  • Adverse effects [Time frame: 8 days]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years of age or older (up to 64 years)
  • Any demographic
  • ASA 1 and 2 (mild or absent systemic illnesses, deemed fit for undergoing dental extractions under intravenous sedation)
  • Not pregnant (as will not qualify to undergo procedure under intravenous sedation as part of routine standard-of-care)
  • Adequate mental ability to understand and provide informed consent
  • Has smart phone and internet connection

Exclusion criteria

  • Age older than 64 years (because they are poor candidates for undergoing procedures under intravenous sedation)
  • Pregnant
  • Incapable of providing informed consent
  • Any systemic condition that renders the patient at higher risk for complications under intravenous sedation
  • Documented allergy to the dental local anesthetic
  • Inability to tolerate any of the commonly used pain medications such as combination opioids, acetaminophen (Tylenol®) or ibuprofen (Motrin® or Advil®)
  • Limitation in adequate mouth opening in presence/absence of pain

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • The University Hospital- Dental Clinic — Newark

Publications

  • Quek SYP, Gomes-Zagury J, Subramanian G. Twin Block in Myogenous Orofacial Pain: Applied Anatomy, Technique Update, and Safety. Anesth Prog. 2020 Jun 1;67(2):103-106. doi: 10.2344/anpr-67-01-03. PMID 32633773
  • Kanti V, Ananthan S, Subramanian G, Quek SYP. Efficacy of the twin block, a peripheral nerve block for the management of chronic masticatory myofascial pain: A case series. Quintessence Int. 2017 Oct 6:725-729. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a39094. Online ahead of print. PMID 28990015
  • Quek S, Young A, Subramanian G. The twin block: a simple technique to block both the masseteric and the anterior deep temporal nerves with one anesthetic injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Sep;118(3):e65-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.227. Epub 2014 Feb 6. PMID 24703404

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05335070 · Pro2021002543

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗