Menu
Recruiting NCT05326880

5-year Follow up Study on the Comparative Performance of Two-piece Zirconia and Titanium Implants

No phase Interventional Dental Implants Single Tooth Lost Dental Implant Failed

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Ceramic Dental Implant, Titanium Dental Implant.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Dental Implants, Single Tooth Lost, Dental Implant Failed. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Germany, Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparative Performance of Two-piece Zirconia Tissue Level Implants vs. Titanium Bone Level Implants Placed With a Fully Digital Workflow - 5-year Follow up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

A post-market, randomized-controlled, superiority clinical study to compare medium-term performance and safety of the Straumann PURE 2-piece Ceramic Implant with Straumann Bone Level Implant using a fully digital workflow.

Detailed description

Dental implants are a key modality for tooth replacement. Titanium dental implants have been the mainstay of dental implants as it osseointegrate well. Titanium has a silver gray metallic color and therefore, to hide its presence and enhance the aesthetic appearance, the implant is usually placed deeper into the bone tissue and the gums. This has negative consequences since it becomes more difficult to keep the interface between the dental implant and the crown free from bacterial plaque and inflammation. The use of zirconia(a base form of metal with similar properties of titanium in terms of osseointegration) has attracted a lot of interest because of its color that is similar to the one of natural teeth.This study will hence compare the long term performance of standard 4th generation dental implants made of titanium with a second generation zirconia dental implant. The study will evaluate the occurence of biological and technical complications; patient satisfaction and with the aesthetics of the tooth replacement over time.

Interventions

  • Device Ceramic Dental Implant
    The ceramic implant will be placed in healed extraction sockets in the premolar-to-premolar area in the mandible and maxilla for single tooth replacement followed by prosthetic loading with definitive prosthesis after 6 months healing time. Type 4 surgery will be performed as defined by the ITI Consensus Statements for Implant Placement in Extraction Sockets: healed sites, typically around 16 weeks after tooth was extracted or after tooth was lost to allow complete healing of the ridge as well a
  • Device Titanium Dental Implant
    The titanium implant will be placed in healed extraction sockets in the premolar-to-premolar area in the mandible and maxilla for single tooth replacement followed by prosthetic loading with definitive prosthesis after 6 months healing time. Type 4 surgery will be performed as defined by the ITI Consensus Statements for Implant Placement in Extraction Sockets: healed sites, typically around 16 weeks after tooth was extracted or after tooth was lost to allow complete healing of the ridge as well

Primary outcome measures

  • Bone level change [Time frame: 5 years after implant loading (final crown restoration)]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Implant survival [Time frame: 5 years after loading]
  • Complication/event free survival [Time frame: 5 years after loading]
  • 14 item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) [Time frame: 5 years after loading]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

following criteria must be met for inclusion in the study:

  • Patients must have voluntarily signed the Informed Consent Form before any study related procedures are performed, are willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits and agree that the pseudonymized data will be collected, analyzed, and published.
  • Patients must be males or females who are a minimum of 18 years of age.
  • Patients, who have received a single tooth replacement with a study implant as per-protocol in the premolar-to-premolar area (excluding lower incisors) in the mandible and maxilla and restored with a screw retained ceramic crown.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance or unreliability.
  • Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant at any point during the study duration.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Germany · 1 center
  • Dusseldorf University Hospital, Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik — Düsseldorf
Hong Kong · 1 center
  • Clinical Research Centre, Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05326880 · P2022-03v1

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗