Menu
Recruiting NCT05316571

Sitting Interruption and Whole-body Cardiovascular Health

No phase Interventional Sedentary Behavior Sedentary Time

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: One 5-Minute Walking Bout Each Hour, One 15-Minute Standing Bout Each Hour, One 5-Minute Walking Bout and One 15-Minute Standing Bout Each Hour, Uninterrupted Sitting.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Sedentary Behavior, Sedentary Time. Basic parameters: 30 years — 60 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Sitting Interruption and Whole-body Cardiovascular Health: Linking Physiological Responses to Risk Behaviors

Overview

There is strong evidence for the association between sedentary behaviors and cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease and stroke. However, the public currently has no clear guidance on how to limit or interrupt their sedentary behaviors. This study will identify and test the physiological effects of several sedentary behavior interruption strategies and explore the feasibility (i.e., likelihood of an individual performing the requested activities) of those strategies to inform the development of public policy surrounding sedentary behavior interruption. Long-term, the findings of this study will inform a large clinical trial that can test whether sedentary behavior reduction can decrease cardiovascular disease risk.

Detailed description

Sedentary behaviors (SB) are biologically distinct but understudied heart disease risk factors. National and international agencies have concluded that the level of evidence for an overall and dose-response association between SB and heart disease mortality is moderate-strong. These agencies do not provide specific recommendations for breaking-up SB, though do call on the research community to facilitate policy development by establishing biological plausibility, identifying the optimal dose for SB substitution strategies, and conducting randomized clinical trials to test the efficacy of these strategies. Accordingly, the goal of this study is to identify mechanism-informed, socioecological-based SB substitution recommendations to reduce heart disease risk. To achieve this goal, two aims will be addressed. Aim 1 will identify a feasible SB substitution strategy to prevent the negative cardiovascular responses to prolonged SB (i.e., strategies that people will actually follow). Adverse cardiovascular responses to prolonged SB will be measured using aortic arterial stiffness (AS), a noninvasive test that predicts future heart disease. To accomplish this aim, 56 middle-aged (30-60 years) participants will provide written informed consent, prior to the measurement of aortic AS and associated mechanistic responses to the following over 4 hours, in a randomized crossover manner: (i) SB with a 5-minute walk break once per hour; (ii) SB with a 15-minute standing break once per hour; (iii) SB with two breaks per hour, alternating between a 5-minute walk and a 15-minute stand; and (iv) SB with no breaks (control). These strategies were selected based on extensive prior work by the investigators, and because they are feasible, which is a key component of this study. SB reduction strategies will only decrease heart disease risk if people are willing to adhere to future SB substitution recommendations. To increase the likelihood of feasibility and long-term adherence, Aim 2 will evaluate the determinants of SB using a socioecological model. This recognizes that behavior change is likely to be limited if the physical and sociocultural environments do not support the behavior change. To accomplish Aim 2, a combined inductive-deductive qualitative approach will be used. Participants who complete Aim 1 will participate in one of 6 focus groups (6-8 participants/group). Crucially, the outcomes from this proposal will be instrumental in helping to design a subsequent clinical trial to test a mechanism-informed yet feasible SB reduction intervention, and in doing so directly support the development of SB policy.

Interventions

  • Behavioral One 5-Minute Walking Bout Each Hour
    One 5-minute light intensity walking break per hour throughout the 4-hour SB condition
  • Behavioral One 15-Minute Standing Bout Each Hour
    One 15-minute standing break per hour throughout the 4-hour SB condition
  • Behavioral One 5-Minute Walking Bout and One 15-Minute Standing Bout Each Hour
    Two breaks per hour throughout the 4-hour SB condition, alternating between a 5-minute light intensity walking break and a 15-minute standing break
  • Behavioral Uninterrupted Sitting
    No breaks will be provided throughout the 4-hour SB condition. This will be used as the control condition

Primary outcome measures

  • Mean Change in Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV) [Time frame: Measurements will be taken immediately before and after each 4-hour SB condition]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Change in Heart-middle Cerebral Artery Pulse Wave Velocity (Brain PWV) [Time frame: Measurements will occur continuously throughout each of the 4-hour SB conditions]
  • Mean Change in Femoral-ankle PWV [Time frame: Measurements will be taken immediately before and after each 4-hour SB condition]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 30-60 years
  • Insufficiently active: self-reported exercise <90 minutes per week for the past 3 months
  • Sedentary: self-reported sitting >8 hours per day
  • Self-reported ability to walk 4 blocks and climb 2 flights of stairs
  • Possession of cellular phone able to receive text messages

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of assisted-walking devices
  • Comorbid condition that would limit the ability to reduce sedentary behavior (e.g., musculoskeletal condition, current chemotherapy)
  • Plans for major surgery within next 3 months
  • Recent history (<1 year) of ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, stroke, or chronic kidney disease
  • Recent (< 1 year) or planned bariatric surgery
  • Systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg
  • Current or recent (within last 6 months) pregnancy; current or recent (within last 3 months) breastfeeding
  • Morbidly obesity (BMI >40 kg/m\^2) or underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m\^2)
  • Use of anti-hypertensive drugs
  • Use of glucose-controlling medication
  • Heavy alcohol consumption (>15 drinks per week)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — Chapel Hill

Publications

  • Higgins S, Cowley ES, Paterson C, Hanson ED, Dave GJ, Meyer ML, Lin FC, Gibbs BB, Vu M, Stoner L. Protocol for a study on Sitting with Interruption and Whole-Body Cardiovascular Health (SWITCH) in middle-aged adults. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Feb;125:107048. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107048. Epub 2022 Dec 9. PMID 36509249

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05316571 · 21-3195 · 1R01HL157187-01A1

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗