Menu
Recruiting NCT05315726

The Effects of Muscle Vibration on the Development of Spasticity and Neuroplasticity in a Post-stroke Population

No phase Interventional Post-stroke Patient in Acute, Sub-acute Phase or Chronic

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Dynamometer, Muscle vibrations, Muscle vibrations, Placebo muscle vibration.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Post-stroke Patient in Acute, Sub-acute Phase or Chronic. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

The Effects of Muscle Vibration on the Development of Spasticity and Neuroplasticity in a Post-stroke Population (Acute and Subacute Phases): Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Several studies have recently tested the use of muscle vibration for the rehabilitation of patients after a stroke. When applied in a repeated and focused manner, this vibration appears to promote the recovery of functional capacities through the mechanisms of neuromuscular plasticity. These results are encouraging, showing in particular a significant decrease in spasticity in post-stroke patients in the chronic phase (\> 6 months after stroke), on the upper and/or lower limbs. However, very few studies have been done on this type of early intervention. Muscle vibration may therefore be an innovative therapy to complement the care that is currently offered in the acute and subacute phase of post-stroke rehabilitation. Moreover, brain plasticity after a stroke is particularly high in the 3 months after the accident, but the vast majority of studies having evaluated the impact of vibration in a chronic phase (\> 12 months post-stroke). It is likely, however, that the influence of vibration, particularly on brain plasticity, is increased in the acute or subacute phase (first 6 months). To date, the effect of vibration on spinal cord or cortical plasticity has not been quantified in the acute or subacute phase. This is why the second part of this project (phase 2) aims to systematically evaluate and quantify the neuroplastic and functional effects of post-stroke vibration in the early phase. Phase 1 - Validation of a method for measuring spasticity (upper limb) with an isokinetic dynamometer 32 patients with ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (\> 3 months after stroke) Phase 2 - Use of this objective technique to measure the effect of a muscle vibration protocol to limit the onset of spasticity in a population of 100 patients following a stroke, in the acute or subacute phase (\< 6 weeks post-stroke) in a randomized trial: * intervention group: usual rehabilitation + muscle vibrations * control group: usual rehabilitation + placebo vibrations

Interventions

  • Other Dynamometer
    Measurement of elbow/wrist spasticity
  • Other Muscle vibrations
    1 session of 10 minutes
  • Other Muscle vibrations
    3 times/week for 6 weeks
  • Other Placebo muscle vibration
    3 times/week for 6 weeks

Primary outcome measures

  • Phase 1: Joint angle (elbow or wrist of the limb contralateral to the brain injury) [Time frame: at baseline]
  • Phase 2: Scoring wrist flexor muscle spasticity [Time frame: at 6 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb [Time frame: at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb [Time frame: at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Sensorimotor function modifications of the paretic upper limb [Time frame: at 0, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the wrist [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the elbow [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the elbow [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb at the elbow [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Spasticity of the paretic limb (wrist and elbow) [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Neuroplasticity modifications evaluated on the flexor carpi radialis [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]
  • Neuroplasticity modifications evaluated on the flexor carpi radialis [Time frame: at 0, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Phase 1:

  • Adult patient,
  • Medically stable on medical assessment, with no contraindications to stroke rehabilitation management management (no medical problems or acute intercurrent medical events),
  • Have had an ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke (> 3 months post-stroke), impacting the motor skills of the upper limbs,
  • 1 ≤ MAS < 4 on elbow or wrist flexors,
  • Having given oral consent.

Phase 2:

  • Adult patient > 18 years old,
  • Able to follow a rehabilitation program on medical opinion (no medical issues or acute intercurrent medical events),
  • First stroke ever < 6 weeks, confirmed by imaging,
  • Hemiparesis or hemiplegia of the upper limb (FMA-UE score < 48), particularly in the wrist and elbow flexors,
  • Requiring inpatient or outpatient hospitalization in a rehabilitation center,
  • Having given oral consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Phases 1 and 2:
  • Significant pain on mobilization of the wrist or elbow (VAS > 5/10),
  • Presence of other neurological, muscular or osteoarticular conditions altering upper limb function,
  • Apparent wound, which may postpone inclusion, or very fragile skin,
  • Significant cognitive impairments: inability to understand simple instructions or give consent of any kind (not included if: LAST scores < 5/7 in comprehension, and if YES/NO answers are unreliable),
  • Not covered by national health insurance,
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding,
  • Being under guardianship or curatorship.
  • Person subject to a measure of legal protection

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Sequential
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 2 centers
  • SSR Marguerite BOUCICAUT — Chalon-sur-Saône
  • Chu Dijon Bourgogne — Dijon

Publications

  • Julliand S, Papaxanthis C, Delphin C, Mock A, Raumel MA, Gueugnon M, Ornetti P, Laroche D. IMPROVE study protocol, investigating post-stroke local muscle vibrations to promote cerebral plasticity and functional recovery: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e079918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079918. PMID 38490651

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05315726 · JULLIAND AOIparaM 2021

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗