Infective Endocarditis Surgery Using Conventional Prosthetic Valves Versus Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft

Official title

Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft Versus Conventional Prosthetic Valves for Infective Endocarditis Involving the Aortic Valve : a Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Overview

: Evidence suggested that autologous or allogeneic tissue is more suitable to synthetic material in an infected field. Given the unwillingness of some surgeons to use artificial foreign materials, such as conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses, cryopreserved aortic homografts (CAH) have been recommended revealing favorable outcomes in aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) surgery (1-5). This aspect is even more evident in cases involving prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and other complex and aggressive lesions involving the aortic root and intervalvular fibrosa with abscess formation. However, most of these reports are fixed on single-arm observational studies without comparing CAH with conventional prostheses. The key question of this study is to establish the difference in treatment failure (death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation), all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, hospitalizations for heart failure during follow-up (structural/non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis) in patients who received the CAH vs conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses for aortic valve replacement (AVR) secondary to infective endocarditis (IE)

Detailed description

The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve endocarditis at risk of embolization, heart failure and uncontrolled infection undergoing AVR with the use of CAH or conventional mechanical or stent xenograft valve prostheses. Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for the treatment of infection, LV dysfunction and heart failure. Patients enrolled in the studies were NYHA functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.

Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with CAH, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of mechanical prostheses.

Interventions

• Procedure Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft
  CAH is used for aortic root reconstruction and for repair of mitro-aortic curtain (emicommando procedure) and it is inserted as miniroot . In cases of PVE the infected prosthesis is removed with aggressive debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. (7)The coronary ostia are prepared for reconstruction of aortic root. In complex valve endocarditis involving aortic and mitral valve a double homograft may be used.Mitro-aortic endocarditis intervalvular fibrosa is largely involved.The abscess
• Procedure Stented/Non stented xenograft
  The insertion of stented/non stented xenograft may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Biological valves may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic bioroot using bioprosthetic valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by the surgeon
• Procedure Mechanical prostheses
  The insertion of conventional mechanical valves may be performed using separate or continuos stich with or without teflon pledget. Mechanical prostheses may be implated alone or combined with polyester or pericardial patch when reconstruction of annulus is required. In cases of aggressive lesions requiring root and /or intervalvular fibrosa reconstruction the choice of prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical valve is considered acceptable alternatives to CAH although it should be guided by t

Primary outcome measures

• Treatment failure [Time frame: 10 years]

Secondary outcome measures (9)

• Overall Mortality [Time frame: 10 years]
• Cardiac Death [Time frame: 10 years]
• Non Cardiac Death [Time frame: 10 years]
• Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (HF) [Time frame: 10 years]
• Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) [Time frame: 10 years]
• Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEF) [Time frame: 10 years]
• Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (recurrence) [Time frame: 10 years]
• Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEDD) [Time frame: 10 years]
• Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (Aortic Root diameter) [Time frame: 10 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Duke Criteria
• Uncontrolled Infection Local abscess Large vegetation False aneurysm, Fistula, Dehiscence of PV
• Embolism Large vegetation >10mm, persistent infection
• Heart Failure Involvement of aortic root, intervalvular fibrosa, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock

Exclusion criteria

• Pediatric
• Any echocardiographic evidence of absence of IE

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model

Cohort

Study locations

France · 1 center

• Francesco Nappi — Saint-Denis

Publications

• Nappi F, Nenna A, Petitti T, Spadaccio C, Gambardella I, Lusini M, Chello M, Acar C. Long-term outcome of cryopreserved allograft for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;156(4):1357-1365.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.040. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PMID 29759737
• Olivito S, Lalande S, Nappi F, Hammoudi N, D'Alessandro C, Fouret P, Acar C. Structural deterioration of the cryopreserved mitral homograft valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):313-20, 320.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.041. Epub 2011 Sep 8. PMID 21855094
• Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Dreyfus J, Attias D, Acar C, Bando K. Mitral endocarditis: A new management framework. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;156(4):1486-1495.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.159. Epub 2018 Apr 13. No abstract available. PMID 29884490
• Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Acar C. Use of allogeneic tissue to treat infective valvular disease: Has everything been said? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.071. Epub 2016 Oct 24. No abstract available. PMID 27866779
• Kim JB, Ejiofor JI, Yammine M, Camuso JM, Walsh CW, Ando M, Melnitchouk SI, Rawn JD, Leacche M, MacGillivray TE, Cohn LH, Byrne JG, Sundt TM. Are homografts superior to conventional prosthetic valves in the setting of infective endocarditis involving the aortic valve? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 May;151(5):1239-46, 1248.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.061. Epub 2016 Jan 23. PMID 26936004
• Sabik JF, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Marullo AG, Pettersson GB, Cosgrove DM. Aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allograft for prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;74(3):650-9; discussion 659. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03779-7. PMID 12238819
• Savage EB, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Asher CR, Brennan JM, Gammie JS. Outcomes and prosthesis choice for active aortic valve infective endocarditis: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):806-14. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jul 29. PMID 25085561
• Nappi F, Asta L, Garufi L, Avtaar Singh SS, Benedetto U, Acar C, Fiore A. Infective endocarditis surgery using conventional prosthetic valves versus homograft: the IESCOPO study protocol. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2026 Apr 30;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13019-026-04088-8. PMID 42063114

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05253469 · CN-21-24

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗