Multicentric, Randomized Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine in Patients With ARDS
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Normal Saline, Centhaquine.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine as an Adjuvant to the Standard of Care in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Overview
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with a diffuse, inflammatory form of lung injury, causing pulmonary infiltration and respiratory failure leading to poor oxygenation. It is a rapidly progressive form of respiratory failure and accounts for approximately 10% of admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) and has a high mortality (40%) in severe cases. Globally, approximately 3 million ARDS cases are reported each year, with around 200,000 cases seen in the United States. The etiology of ARDS could be pulmonary or extra-pulmonary. Patients with ARDS have symptoms like difficulty in breathing, shortness of breath, and cyanosis, and they may require assisted breathing/ventilatory support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. About 25% of ARDS patients need mechanical ventilation to support breathing; however, a ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is known to further exacerbate ARDS in many of them. In recent decades, numerous efforts have been made to develop therapies for treating/managing ARDS. Unfortunately, they have been largely unsuccessful or inconclusive, and at present, no effective pharmacological therapy for ARDS is available. Hence, development of better therapeutics for ARDS is an unmet need. Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Results from multicentric, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) studies conducted in India indicate that centhaquine is a novel, first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied in the combined phase II and III trials, while a multicentric phase IV study (NCT05956418) in 400 patients with hypovolemic shock is currently being conducted in India. The outcomes of the completed trials indicate that centhaquine is safe and reduces mortality significantly (P=0.0271) compared to standard treatment of hypovolemic shock. In the phase II and III studies, ARDS and MODS were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly reduced ARDS and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in patients enrolled in these trials, which suggests that centhaquine has potential beyond treating hypovolemic shock and could be useful for ARDS treatment. Centhaquine is likely to provide hemodynamic stability, improve tissue oxygenation, reduce pulmonary edema, reduce ARDS score, and reduce MODS in patients with ARDS.
Detailed description
This is a multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-II clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of centhaquine as an adjuvant to the standard of care in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Approximately 10 study centers in the United States will participate in the study. For an individual patient, the duration of the study will be 60 days, including 3 study visits: visit 1/Day 1 (screening/randomization/baseline/treatment visit), visit 2/Day 28, and visit 3/End of Study (Day 60). At visit 1, approximately 80 eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 into 2 treatment groups of 40 each after meeting the eligibility criteria. A total of 40 patients will be enrolled in the centhaquine group (Group 1) and a total of 40 patients in the control group (Group 2):
* Group 1 (Active Group): Centhaquine (Dose: 0.01 mg/kg) + Standard of care * Group 2 (Control group): Equal volume of Normal Saline + Standard of care In both treatment groups, patients will be provided with the standard of care. Centhaquine or Equal volume of Normal Saline will be administered intravenously after randomization to patients meeting the eligibility criteria. In the centhaquine group, centhaquine (0.01 mg/kg) dose will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 1 hour in 100 mL of normal saline. An additional dose of centhaquine will be administered on Day 2 if oxygenation and/or vasopressor support is required, but not before 24 hours of the previous dose (maximum 2 doses at an interval of 24 hours can be administered). In the control group, equal volume of normal saline will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 1 hour post-randomization. Conditions of administration will remain the same as for the centhaquine group. All subjects will be closely monitored during and after infusion. Vital signs will be monitored every 10 minutes during infusion. In the event of worsening hemodynamics or respiratory status, the infusion will be discontinued. Each subject will be monitored closely and followed up throughout his/her hospitalization. Moreover, he/she will be assessed for safety and efficacy parameters over 60 days from randomization.
Interventions
- Drug Normal Saline
Placebo (Dose: equal volume saline) + Standard of care - Drug Centhaquine
Centhaquine (Dose: 0.01 mg/kg) + Standard of care
Primary outcome measures
- Improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥200 mmHg or relative increase by 50 mmHg from baseline [Time frame: 3 days]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- 28-day all-cause mortality [Time frame: 28 days]
- 60-day all-cause mortality [Time frame: 60 days]
- Time to clinical improvement on WHO 8-point ordinal scale [Time frame: 60 days]
- Hospital free days [Time frame: 28 days]
- ICU free days [Time frame: 28 days]
- Ventilator free days (VFDs) [Time frame: 28 days]
- Days alive free of renal replacement therapy [Time frame: 28 days]
- Days alive free of vasopressor(s) [Time frame: 28 days]
- A ≥ 50% reduction in vasopressor(s) (norepinephrine equivalents; NEE) dose. [Time frame: 3 days]
- Change in blood lactate [Time frame: 3 days]
- Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score [Time frame: 9 days]
- Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) [Time frame: 28 days]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
A subject will be eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she fulfills the following criteria:
- Adult male or female aged 18 years or older
- Hospitalized in the ICU diagnosed with moderate to severe ARDS having a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of < 200 mmHg or the SPO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤ 235( if SPO2 ≤ 97 %) with PEEP ≥ 5 cm H20 include the patient receiving invasive /non-invasive ventilation (NIV/CPAP).
- The first dose of the study drug should be administered within 48 hours of confirming moderate to severe ARDS.
- Requires vasopressor support
- Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if he/she meets any of the following exclusion criteria:
- Receiving or expected to receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
- Confirmed pregnancy
- Breast feeding
- Participating in another interventional study
- Requires or having the renal replacement therapy
- Hepatic failure (Child-Pugh scores B and C)
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Gulati A, Choudhuri R, Gupta A, Singh S, Ali SKN, Sidhu GK, Haque PD, Rahate P, Bothra AR, Singh GP, Maheshwari S, Jeswani D, Haveri S, Agarwal A, Agrawal NR. A Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled Phase III Study of Centhaquine (Lyfaquin(R)) as a Resuscitative Agent in Hypovolemic Shock Patients. Drugs. 2021 Jun;81(9):1079-1100. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01547-5. Epub 2021 Jun 1. PMID 34061314
- Ranjan AK, Zhang Z, Briyal S, Gulati A. Centhaquine Restores Renal Blood Flow and Protects Tissue Damage After Hemorrhagic Shock and Renal Ischemia. Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 3;12:616253. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.616253. eCollection 2021. PMID 34012389
- Gulati A, Jain D, Agrawal NR, Rahate P, Choudhuri R, Das S, Dhibar DP, Prabhu M, Haveri S, Agarwal R, Lavhale MS. Resuscitative Effect of Centhaquine (Lyfaquin(R)) in Hypovolemic Shock Patients: A Randomized, Multicentric, Controlled Trial. Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):3223-3265. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01760-4. Epub 2021 May 10. PMID 33970455
- Kontouli Z, Staikou C, Iacovidou N, Mamais I, Kouskouni E, Papalois A, Papapanagiotou P, Gulati A, Chalkias A, Xanthos T. Resuscitation with centhaquin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 improves survival in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock: a randomized experimental study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec;45(6):1077-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0980-1. Epub 2018 Jul 13. PMID 30006694
- Briyal S, Gandhakwala R, Khan M, Lavhale MS, Gulati A. Alterations in endothelin receptors following hemorrhage and resuscitation by centhaquin. Physiol Res. 2018 Jun 27;67(Suppl 1):S199-S214. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933856. PMID 29947540
- Papalexopoulou K, Chalkias A, Pliatsika P, Papalois A, Papapanagiotou P, Papadopoulos G, Arnaoutoglou E, Petrou A, Gulati A, Xanthos T. Centhaquin Effects in a Swine Model of Ventricular Fibrillation: Centhaquin and Cardiac Arrest. Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Aug;26(8):856-863. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 19. PMID 28385449
- O'Donnell JN, O'Donnell EP, Kumar EJ, Lavhale MS, Andurkar SV, Gulati A, Scheetz MH. Pharmacokinetics of centhaquin citrate in a dog model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;68(6):803-9. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12554. Epub 2016 Apr 25. PMID 27109141
- O'Donnell JN, Gulati A, Lavhale MS, Sharma SS, Patel AJ, Rhodes NJ, Scheetz MH. Pharmacokinetics of centhaquin citrate in a rat model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;68(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12498. Epub 2016 Jan 4. PMID 26725913
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05241067 · Centhaquine/ARDS /CT-2.2/2022