Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT05154188

Post Approval Study to Assure the ContInued saFety and effectIveness of Neuro Cochlear Implant System in Adult Users

Observational Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Neuro Cochlear Implant system.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

On June 23, 2021, the Oticon Medical Neuro Cochlear Implant System (NCIS) was granted premarket approval (PMA) in the US to treat individuals 18 years or older, with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, who obtain limited benefit from appropriately fitted hearing aid(s). To help assure the continued safety and effectiveness of an approved device, a post-approval study was required as a condition of approval under 21 CFR 814.82(a)(2). The purpose of this study is to provide longer-term data on the safety and effectiveness of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System under general conditions of use in the postmarket environment.

Detailed description

The post-approval study will be an open-label, prospective, multi-center, single-arm, non-randomized, self-controlled clinical trial in 10 clinical sites in the US.

The purpose of this study is to provide longer-term data on the safety and effectiveness of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System under general conditions of use in the postmarket environment. This study will be conducted as a prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized study in 10 clinical sites.

A total of 60 subjects, newly treated will be enrolled. Study subjects will be followed for 3 years post implantation of the device with a target follow-up rate of 80% at the end of the study

The primary safety endpoint is the comparison of the type and frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events observed during the study period. The effectiveness endpoints will include the within-subject differences for sentence recognition as evaluated with the AzBio test.

The study will include the following visits: baseline, 1-month post-surgery (activation date), 3 months, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months, 24-months, and 36-months post-activation. Each participant will serve as their own control with baseline measurements.

The total estimated duration of the study is 60 months: 24 months of recruitment and 36 months of subject participation.

The first patient is expected to be included within 6 months of study approval (obtained on August 19, 2021).

Interventions

  • Device Neuro Cochlear Implant system
    Patients will be regular candidates for a cochlear implantation surgery, according to the indication criteria of the Neuro Cochlear Implant System and the device will be used according to its intended purpose

Primary outcome measures

  • Stability of improvement of speech perception performance at 12- and 36-months post-activation with AzBio sentence scores. [Time frame: At 12- and 36-months post-activation (visit 9 and visit 11)]
  • Safety outcome [Time frame: From Visit 1(8- 12 weeks pre-surgery) to Visit 12 (36 Months post-activation)]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Stability of improvement of speech perception performance at 12- and 36-months post-activation with CNC-words scores. [Time frame: At 12- and 36-months post-activation (visit 9 & visit 12)]
  • Stability of outcomes over time using AzBio Sentence scores at 1 month in Quiet. [Time frame: At 1 month post-activation (Visit 6)]
  • Stability of outcomes over time using AzBio sentences in Quiet and Noise at 3- ; 6- and 24-months post-activation [Time frame: at 3 months(visit 7), 6 months (visit 9) and 24 months (visit 11)]
  • Stability of outcomes over time using CNC word scores at 3-, 6- and 24-months [Time frame: At 3 months(visit 7), 6 months (visit 9) and 24 months (visit 11)]
  • Stability of outcomes over time for patients under a bimodal condition (i.e., patient wearing a contralateral hearing aid). [Time frame: At 3-months post activation (visit 7) and 12 months (visit 9)]
  • Longitudinal measures of patient reported outcomes in a newly-implanted population [Time frame: At 6-,12-,24- and 36 months post-activation (Visits 8,9,11,12)]
  • Longitudinal measures of cognitive abilities in a newly implanted population [Time frame: At 12-24 and 36 months post-activation (Visits 9,11,12)]
  • Longitudinal programming parameters (T- and C- levels) [Time frame: At activation (Visit 5), then from 3 months post-activation (V7) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)]
  • Longitudinal device functionality measures (impedances) [Time frame: At activation (Visit 5), then from 3 months post-activation (V7) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)]
  • Pedictors of outcomes: Electrode impedances collected at all intervals [Time frame: At surgery visit (Visit 3 baseline visit) then from activation, 1-month post surgery( visit 5) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)]
  • Pedictors of outcomes: eCAP responses collected in the operating room [Time frame: From activation (visit 5) throught study completion (an average of 3 years post activation)]
  • Proportion of major postsurgical complications and AEs over time [Time frame: At surgery visit (i.e. visit 3, baseline visit, )]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals 18 years of age or older
  • Obtain limited benefit from appropriately fitted hearing aids
  • Bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss \_ Severe-to-profound hearing loss is determined by a pure-tone average (PTA) superior or equal (≥) to 70 dB HL at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz. Limited benefit from amplification is defined by scores of 50% or less on a validated sentence recognition test in quiet (AzBio sentences), in the best-aided listening condition \_

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous cochlear implantation
  • Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array
  • Active external or middle ear infections or tympanic membrane perforation in the ear to be implanted
  • Presence of medical contraindications to middle-ear or inner-ear surgery or anesthesia as required
  • Diagnosis of retro-cochlear pathology
  • Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy
  • Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure and use of the prosthetic device
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with all investigational requirements
  • Additional cognitive, medical, or social handicaps that would prevent completion of all study requirements

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05154188 · CIP25

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗