Menu
Recruiting NCT05151822

Virtual Reality in Awake Surgery : Pilot Study VIRAS

No phase Interventional Surgery

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Training session with the virtual reality mask, Monitoring of the device, Acceptability of the device, Patient state of anxiety.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Surgery. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The VIRAS (Virtual Reality in Awake Surgery) project is a two-stage, adaptive study. Its goal is to demonstrate the tolerance of the virtual reality (VR) headset for performing cognitive neuro-monitoring during awake brain surgery. Awake surgery involves operating on patients who remain conscious during the procedure and is most commonly employed in interventions such as tumor resections and epilepsy treatments. This approach allows surgeons to monitor and preserve critical brain functions by engaging the patient in real-time assessments of motor, sensory, and cognitive capabilities. The use of immersive distractions such as VR can help reduce anxiety and discomfort during awake craniotomy. In order to control the risks as well as possible, the investigators have tested the equipment on patients who will undergo orthopedic surgery under local anesthesia at the hospital of Brest (Saliou V, Dardenne G, Panheleux C, Le Vourc'h F, Bleunven J, Maoudj I, Longo B, Dubrana F, Yvinou A, Fernandez M, Consigny M, Nowak E, Guellec D, Seizeur R. Virtual Reality in Awake brain Surgery (VIRAS) stage I: Proof of concept and tolerance validation during scheduled orthopedic surgery. PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0329894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329894. PMID: 40901801; PMCID: PMC12407469.) The second part of the project; the equipment is tested on patients wich undergo neurosurgery in awake condition, using the same equipment and procedures as in the orthopedic cohort. An additional element will be the integration of a dedicated software application for the selection and control of neurofunctional tests. This application relies on an algorithm that incorporates both lesion laterality and tumor location, enabling dynamic adaptation of the test sequence.

Interventions

  • Other Training session with the virtual reality mask
    Patients will have a training session with the virtual reality mask, the day before surgery. The training consists in the realization, by the patient, of a series of language or neuropsychological tests and evaluation of the acceptability of the device by the patient with Visual Analog Scale (device tolerance from 0 (intolerable) to 10 (completely tolerated)).
  • Other Monitoring of the device
    In the operating room : installation and per-operative monitoring of the device. If the device was removed, the list of device side effects or surgery-related adverse events that was required discontinuation of the device will be established.
  • Other Acceptability of the device
    After the surgery: evaluation of the acceptability of the device by the patient with Visual Analog Scale (device tolerance from 0 (intolerable) to 10 (completely tolerated))
  • Other Patient state of anxiety
    Assessing patient's state of anxiety with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) after surgery.

Primary outcome measures

  • Tolerance of minimum 1 hour of the virtual reality mask (realization, by the patient, of a series of of language or neuropsychological tests) [Time frame: 1 Day]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Device-related adverse event [Time frame: 1 Day]
  • Withdrawal of the device [Time frame: 1 Day]
  • Device tolerance for the patient [Time frame: 1 Day]
  • Device tolerance for the medical staff [Time frame: 1 Day]
  • Patient state of anxiety [Time frame: 1 Day]
  • Presence of neurocognitive sequelae in patients who have undergone neurosurgery [Time frame: 3 months after the surgery]
  • Presence of neurocognitive sequelae in patients who have undergone neurosurgery [Time frame: 3 months after the surgery]
  • Neurological sensory-motor examination for patients who have undergone neurosurgery [Time frame: Three months after surgery]
  • Patient state of anxiety after neurosurgery [Time frame: 1 Day]
  • Patient state of anxiety after neurosurgery [Time frame: Three months after the neurosurgery]
  • Patient state of anxiety after neurosurgery [Time frame: Three months after the neurosurgery]
  • Patient state of anxiety after neurosurgery [Time frame: Three months after the neurosurgery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Major subject
  • Consent for the study
  • Patients eligible for orthopedic surgery with local anesthetic block
  • Estimated duration of the Orthopedic surgery of minimum 1 hour
  • For neurosurgical patients in a awake state : Patients eligible for awake neurosurgery (multidisciplinary decision: neurosurgeon, neurologist, oncologist, radiation therapist, anesthesiologist, after psychological, neuropsychological, and speech therapy evaluation)

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 years, Age > 75 years,
  • Known central neurological pathology/cognitive impairment,
  • Mini-Mental State examination (MMSe) < 23 if no school certificate, < 27 if school certificate,
  • History of vertigo,
  • Claustrophobia,
  • Visual deficit not compatible with the use of the virtual reality mask,
  • Contraindication to surgery,
  • Outpatient treatment,
  • Refusal or inability to consent.
  • For neurosurgical patients in a awake state : Psychological/psychiatric contraindications to awake surgery.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Pr SEIZEUR Romuald — Brest

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05151822 · 29BRC21.0039 (VIRAS)

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗