This is a Study to Verify if Marrow Venting Procedure Can Improve Meniscal Suture Healing
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Meniscal repair, Marrow venting procedure.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Meniscal Tear. Basic parameters: 16 years — 50 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Switzerland
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Biological Augmentation Of Meniscal Repair With Marrow Venting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Meniscal suture represents the current surgical practice, and marrow venting is a low risk procedure. Bone venting may be able to improve the outcome of meniscal repair, allowing the patient a better recovery.
Detailed description
Meniscal tears are one of the most common lesions of the knee and are a risk factor for the development of knee osteoarthritis. A meniscal tear commonly causes knee pain, stiffness, loss of function and sometimes catching or locking of the knee, affecting patients' ability to participate in their everyday activities. In case of ineffective conservative management, meniscal tears are treated with meniscectomy (partial or total) or meniscal repair, with the latter considered, when possible, the optimal choice.
Meniscal repair consists of a suture that juxtaposes the flaps of the injured meniscus to facilitate the healing of the tear. Unfortunately, meniscal healing capability is limited. A higher rate of meniscal tears healing has been documented in patients treated simultaneously with a meniscal repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A surgical augmentation technique performing micro-fractures on the medial aspect of the lateral femoral condyle during meniscal repair surgery has been developed to mimic the beneficial effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the joint environment. This technique has been successfully tested in preclinical studies, in human cohort studies and, recently, in a randomized control trial. However, these randomised controlled trials present some methodological weaknesses, such as a low number of included patients, and included only full-thickness vertical longitudinal tears in the red-red zone, the meniscal tears with the highest healing potential. The effect of additional micro-fractures on the healing capacity of meniscal tears involving the red-white zone has never been tested.
Interventions
- Procedure Meniscal repair
The meniscus is trimmed with an arthroscopic punch followed by an electric shaver to expose the margins of the tear and remove damaged tissue. Vertical sutures are made using TRUESPAN™ Meniscal Repair System (DePuy Synthes) to approximate both the femoral and tibial surfaces of the torn meniscus. - Procedure Marrow venting procedure
After meniscal repair, a bone marrow venting procedure will be performed: a 45° micro-fracture awl is repeatedly penetrated through the bone of the intercondylar notch at the PCL origin until marrow elements are seen to enter the joint.
Primary outcome measures
- subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score [Time frame: 2 years]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
- Objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) [Time frame: (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)]
- Lysholm score (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years) [Time frame: (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)]
- Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - KOOS [Time frame: (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)]
- Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [Time frame: (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)]
- Function 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [Time frame: (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)]
- Tegner score [Time frame: (prior to the injury (e.g. referred to the day before), pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)]
- Healing rate [Time frame: 1 year]
- Treatment related adverse events [Time frame: 5 years]
- Function curves during the first 6 weeks. [Time frame: 6 weeks]
- Pain curves during the first 6 weeks. [Time frame: 6 weeks]
- Radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis [Time frame: 5 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Arthroscopic confirmed suturable meniscal tears,
- Monolateral meniscal tears,
- 18-45 years,
- BMI>18,5 and <35 kg/m2,
- Ability to give informed consent by signature.
Exclusion criteria
- Bilateral meniscal tears requiring treatment,
- Associated ligament lesions requiring treatment,
- Associated cartilage lesions (Outerbridge > 2),
- Knee axis deformities requiring correction
- Generalized ligamentous laxity,
- Radiographic knee ostheoarthritis,
- Other reasons for knee pain,
- Pregnant or lactating women,
- Serious systemic diseases such as cardiac, hepatic or renal failure, rheumatic diseases, non-compensated diabetic, psychological illnesses, central or peripheral neurological diseases, and autoimmune diseases,
- Enrolled in another ongoing clinical trial.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Switzerland · 2 centers
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale — Lugano
- Clinica Ars Medica — Lugano
Publications
- Ahn JH, Kwon OJ, Nam TS. Arthroscopic repair of horizontal meniscal cleavage tears with marrow-stimulating technique. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 18. PMID 25242513
- Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88(4):698-705. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00339. PMID 16595458
- Bryant D, Dill J, Litchfield R, Amendola A, Giffin R, Fowler P, Kirkley A. Effectiveness of bioabsorbable arrows compared with inside-out suturing for vertical, reparable meniscal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):889-96. doi: 10.1177/0363546506298582. Epub 2007 Mar 2. PMID 17337726
- Charles HC, Kraus VB, Ainslie M, Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau MP. Optimization of the fixed-flexion knee radiograph. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Nov;15(11):1221-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Oct 31. PMID 17977754
- Crawford K, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2007 Aug;23(8):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.005. PMID 17681205
- de Girolamo L, Galliera E, Volpi P, Denti M, Dogliotti G, Quaglia A, Cabitza P, Corsi Romanelli MM, Randelli P. Why menisci show higher healing rate when repaired during ACL reconstruction? Growth factors release can be the explanation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jan;23(1):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2712-8. Epub 2013 Oct 22. PMID 24146050
- Dean CS, Chahla J, Matheny LM, Mitchell JJ, LaPrade RF. Outcomes After Biologically Augmented Isolated Meniscal Repair With Marrow Venting Are Comparable With Those After Meniscal Repair With Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1341-1348. doi: 10.1177/0363546516686968. Epub 2017 Feb 1. PMID 28298056
- Ding C, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Abram F, Raynauld JP, Cicuttini F, Jones G. Meniscal tear as an osteoarthritis risk factor in a largely non-osteoarthritic cohort: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):776-84. Epub 2007 Mar 15. PMID 17361984
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05053646 · ORL-ORT-019