Menu
Recruiting NCT05041530

Abdominal Wall Closure After Laparotomy in Oncologic Surgery

No phase Interventional Laparotomy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: REBUILD Bioabsorbable.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Laparotomy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Colombia
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single Arm, Feasibility Study Using REBUILD Bioabsorbable™ for Closure of the Abdominal Wall After Oncologic Laparotomy

Overview

The REBUILD Study is a first-in-human evaluation of the safety and performance of REBUILD Bioabsorbable.

Detailed description

REBUILD is an investigational medical device designed to be used with third-party suture to distribute suture tension in abdominal wall closures. In this study, REBUILD will be used in oncology patients undergoing an open, elective, intent-to-cure, laparotomy procedure. The study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study designed to generate descriptive data about the use of REBUILD. The primary safety outcome is reported device-related adverse events. The primary performance outcome is the integrity of the abdominal wall over one year assessed by clinical examination of the abdomen. If available, CT studies performed within 12 months post-procedure will be used to confirm apposition of the medial border of the rectus muscles and integrity of the abdominal wall.

Interventions

  • Device REBUILD Bioabsorbable
    REBUILD is an investigational medical device designed to be used with third-party suture to distribute suture tension in abdominal wall closures.

Primary outcome measures

  • Adverse Events [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Performance [Time frame: 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is 18-75 years of age
  • Patient is scheduled for oncologic, open, elective, intent-to-cure laparotomy
  • Patient is able to provide written informed consent
  • Patient is able and willing to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is scheduled for a palliative procedure
  • Patient has had previous failed surgical repair of a ventral or incisional hernia
  • Patient has a current infection at the intended surgical site
  • Patient is participating in a concurrent investigational medical device study
  • Patient is pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant during the study period
  • Patient has a history of psychological condition, drug or alcohol misuse which may interfere with their ability to be compliant with post-operative visits.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Colombia · 2 centers
  • Clinica Medellin — Medellín
  • Clinica Las Americas — Medellín

Publications

  • Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F. Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217. PMID 27750295
  • Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):129-35. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00018. PMID 12496540
  • Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC. Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):648-55, 655-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038. PMID 20421023
  • Deeken CR, Matthews BD. Characterization of the Mechanical Strength, Resorption Properties, and Histologic Characteristics of a Fully Absorbable Material (Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-PHASIX Mesh) in a Porcine Model of Hernia Repair. ISRN Surg. 2013 May 28;2013:238067. doi: 10.1155/2013/238067. Print 2013. PMID 23781348
  • Glauser PM, Brosi P, Speich B, Kaser SA, Heigl A, Rosenberg R, Maurer CA. Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Following Midline Laparotomy-Long-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1669-1675. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04964-6. PMID 30824961
  • Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G. Effectiveness of Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Mesh Implantation for Prevention of Incisional Hernia in Patients Undergoing Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):109-115. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4221. PMID 30476940
  • San Miguel C, Melero D, Jimenez E, Lopez P, Robin A, Blazquez LA, Lopez-Monclus J, Gonzalez E, Jimenez C, Garcia-Urena MA. Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy. Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1833-x. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PMID 30288617
  • Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik REGJM, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ; PRIMA Trialist Group. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies ( PMID 28641875

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05041530 · CTP-0001

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗