Comparison Between Direct Oral Anticoagulation (DOAC) Interruption and DOAC Continuation in Patients Undergoing Elective Invasive Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Uninterrupted DOAC use, Interrupted DOAC use.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Artery Disease, Anticoagulants. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Netherlands
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized, investigator initiated study. Goal of this study is to examine the safety of uninterrupted periprocedural DOAC use.
Detailed description
Rationale: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often have coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). An estimated 5 to 15% of all AF patients will require coronary stenting. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) are more commonly used in preventing thromboembolic complications in patients with AF, thereby substituting the use of Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKA). Therefore, many patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). In patients using VKA it is recommended to defer elective coronary angiography until international Normalized Ratio (INR) is \<2.2 when radial artery access is used. However, no large clinical trials have proven the safety of continuing DOAC use when undergoing ICA or PCI. The current guidelines recommend interrupting DOAC treatment at least 24 before ICA or PCI; however, this recommendation is only based on limited data. Clinical decisions on DOAC use must therefore be based on clinical trials in which substantial numbers of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) were included.
Objective: To study the safety of DOAC continuation in patients undergoing ICA or PCI.
Study design: A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized, investigator initiated study.
Study population: Patients aged \>18 years using DOAC and undergoing elective ICA or PCI.
Intervention: The intervention group will continue using DOAC as usual. No adjustments of DOAC use will be made before and after ICA or PCI. The control group will receive standard care. DOAC use will be interrupted at least 24-48 hours in advance of ICA or PCI, based on renal clearance and DOAC specimen.
Main study parameters/endpoints: : Non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) related in-hospital bleeding (BARC 2, 3 or 5).
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Only a small burden is associated with participation. Patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire after 30 days. Patients in the control group may have a mildly higher risk of thromboembolic complications and patients in the intervention group may have a mildly higher risk of bleeding complications.
Interventions
- Other Uninterrupted DOAC use
Continuing DOAC use in advance of elective ICA or PCI. - Other Interrupted DOAC use
Usual care, interruption of DOAC prior to procedure.
Primary outcome measures
- Major Bleeding [Time frame: 30 days]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients aged >18 years using DOAC and undergoing elective ICA or PCI.
- Provided signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
Any of the following:
- Patients initially presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (STEMI, NSTEMI, UA)
- Patients <18 years old
- Calculated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
- Patients simultaneously participating in another clinical trial
- History or condition associated with increased bleeding risk, as listed below:
- Major surgical procedure within 30 days before the procedure
- Known inaccessible radial artery during previous procedure
- History of GI bleeding in the previous 6 months
- History of intracranial, intraocular, spinal, or atraumatic intra-articular bleeding
- Chronic bleeding disorder
- Known intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, or aneurysm
- Known anemia with last measured haemoglobin value <6 mmol/L \[9.67 g/dL\]
- Current pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Known significant liver disease (e.g., acute clinical hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis), or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 x the upper limit of normal.
- Participation in another clinical trial
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
Netherlands · 1 center
- Zuyderland MC — Heerlen
Publications
- Janssen S, Luijkx JJP, Swinnen W, Vriesendorp P, Ten Berg JM, van 't Hof AWJ, Rasoul S; SLIM-2 study group. Direct oral anticoagulation interruption vs continuation in patients undergoing elective invasive coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: Design and rationale of the South Limburg Myocardial Infarction Study Group Trial 2 (SLIM-2). Am Heart J. 2026 Sep;299:107462. doi: 10 PMID 42055156
Identifiers
NCT: NCT04977076 · METCZ20210099