Standardizing Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring, Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Colonic Carcinoma, Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, Standardisation, Training. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Netherlands
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Implementation of Optimized and Standardized Surgical Technique for Right Sided Colon Cancer: a Prospective Interventional Sequential Cohort Study With a Transition Period
Overview
A surgical intervention might be highly variable amongst surgeons and centers. This variability has a potential relevance concerning clinical outcomes. For right-sided colon cancer, the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) knows substantial variation. Especially since the surgical technique has been evolving during the latest decade with the introduction of intracorporeal anastomosis, a dissection technique within the correct embryological planes (complete mesocolic excision) and central vascular ligation of the segmental branches at its origin, resulting in an optimal lymph node dissection. Given the insights from recent studies showing the association between quality of surgery and relevant clinical outcomes, there is a great need for a formative quality assessment of LRHC. Detailed objective assessment of the LRHC is currently not performed in clinical practice nor in surgical training. Quality assessment of LRHC has great potential to improve surgical training and furthermore, implementation of a standardized technique will ultimately lead to better quality of care for patients suffering from right-sided colon cancer. The main objective of this study is to improve surgical outcomes for patient with right-sided colon cancer by a prospective sequential interventional cohort study that aims to standardize the surgical technique with subsequent controlled implementation after standardized review of the current practice in a nationwide multicenter setting. The primary endpoint is the 30-day morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Detailed description
1. Prospective mapping of current practice with surgical variations in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (total duration of inclusion 3 months) N= 40 centers N = 310 videos
1. METC approval for the use of anonymized videos of a laparoscopic procedure and collection of corresponding clinical outcomes. 2. Approaching hospitals for participation (high volume centers (50+ colon cancers). 3. Prospective inclusion of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in the participating hospitals in three months. 2. Development of Standard Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: an (inter)national Delphi study
1. Approaching specialists to participate in the Delphi method (from participating hospitals in step 1). 2. Identification of crucial steps and measures according to literature and expert's opinion (Delphi method). 3. Documentation of steps and the order in which they need to be performed, development of a competency assessment tool (CAT). 3. Skills center training facility
a. Training the participating surgeons in the method of the standardized laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, as consented in the Delphi method. 4. Implementation of the standardized laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring during another period with prospective inclusion of consecutive patients with collection of surgical videos in all participating hospitals (N=40 centers, total 310 videos)
1. Rating videos. 2. Comparing with pre-implementation performance based on outcome measures reflecting oncological quality of surgery, and 30-day clinical outcomes. 3. Comparing with pre-implementation performance based on the long-term outcomes. (3-year DFS and 5-year OS). 5. Implementing standardised lap right hemicolectomy (after learning curve without proctoring)
1. Consecutive inclusion of patients (n=310) 2. CT imaging 3. Video analysis 4. Competency analysis 5. Variation analysis 6. Clinico pathological data
Interventions
- Procedure Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring
Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with proctoring - Procedure Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring
Implementation standardised laparoscopic right hemicolectomy without proctoring
Primary outcome measures
- 30-day morbidity with Clavien-Dindo grading [Time frame: 30 days]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Intraoperative complications (i.e. vascular injury) [Time frame: 1 day]
- Conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery [Time frame: 1 day]
- Operative time [Time frame: 1 day]
- Blood loss [Time frame: 1 day]
- Validated assessment of plane of dissection [Time frame: 1 day]
- Validated assessment of level of vascular ligation [Time frame: 1 day]
- Grading of the resection specimen according to Benz et al. 2019 [Time frame: 1 day]
- Total lymph node count [Time frame: 1 day]
- Number of resected positive lymph nodes [Time frame: 1 day]
- Resection margins [Time frame: 1 day]
- Completeness of mesocolic excision based on postoperative CT imaging [Time frame: 1 day]
- Locoregional recurrence [Time frame: 3 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Planned laparoscopic (extended) right hemicolectomy for colon cancer of the caecum, ascending colon or hepatic flexure;
- Age above 18 years;
- cTNM stage 1-3 (CT-staged);
- No prior midline or transverse laparotomy;
- ASA1-3;
- No immune modulating medication.
Exclusion criteria
- cT4b;
- Perforated disease;
- Acute obstruction;
- Emergency operation;
- Appendiceal cancer;
- Other primary malignancy treated within 5 years from diagnosis of colon cancer, except for curatively treated prostate, breast, skin and cervical cancer.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomized
- Model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Netherlands · 1 center
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc — Amsterdam
Publications
- Gruter AAJ, Coblijn UK, Toorenvliet BR, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB; Right Collaborators Group. National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study). Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02801-6. Epub 2023 Apr 25. PMID 37097330
Identifiers
NCT: NCT04889456 · 2021.0273