Menu
Recruiting NCT04879862

Locomotor and Bladder Function in Individuals With Acute Spinal Cord Injury

No phase Interventional Spinal Cord Injuries

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Epidural stimulation + Stand Training, Epidural stimulation + Step Training, Epidural stimulation + Bladder Capacity Training, Epidural stimulation + Bladder Voiding Efficiency Training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Spinal Cord Injuries. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Inter-System Closed-Loop Control of Locomotor and Bladder Function in Individuals With Acute Spinal Cord Injury

Overview

The loss of movement and walking ability significantly affects quality of life after spinal cord injury. In addition, bladder dysfunction consistently ranks as one of the top disorders affecting quality of life after spinal cord injury. The overall objective of this study is to demonstrate that epidural stimulation may be a method for improving stepping, standing and bladder function in individuals with spinal cord injury. With the use of epidural stimulation, the investigators propose to investigate how well the participant can stand and walk and how well the participant's bladder can store or hold urine as well as void or empty urine. The results of this study may aid in the development of treatments to help individuals with spinal cord injuries that are unable to stand or walk and have impaired bladder function.

Detailed description

While the investigators have demonstrated the benefits of scES in chronic SCI with one of the largest series (23 patients to date) the investigators are acutely aware of persistent gaps that need to be filled in order to advance the field of neuromodulation forward. Technological advances to upgrade the stimulator's programming and wireless communication platforms are critically needed in order to integrate multiple training paradigms across multiple systems (i.e. motor and autonomic), as well as take advantage of wireless monitoring technology that could improve the patient experience. The extensive patient self-monitoring, for example regular monitoring of blood pressure during bladder filling cycles, and required manual interaction with the programming device to change parameters for optimal stimulation, remains one of the largest limiting factors in the effective utilization of this technology outside of the laboratory. Without technology components developed specifically for individuals with SCI, treatment effects could be lost due to the burden placed on the individual. Our aim is to develop technology that will interact with currently available systems, to facilitate the implementation and integration of training paradigms for the recovery of locomotion and bladder function in individuals with acute SCI and promote safe long-term use of the technology in the home and community. To this end, this study will provide a flexible communication platform specific for SCI, allow for the evaluation of integrated technology in individuals with high plasticity potential (\< 1 year post injury) and allow for the longitudinal evaluation of therapeutic benefits of scES as individuals transition from acute to chronic phase of injury.

Aim 1: To evaluate the use of position based sensors internal to the neurostimulator to modulate stimulation parameters used in the training for motor function recovery following severe SCI.

Aim 2: To identify the scES parameters, using physiological feedback (continuous measures of systolic and diastolic pressure and heart rate), that improve bladder storage and emptying while controlling blood pressure following severe SCI.

Aim 3: To improve device technologies and develop predictive learning algorithms that will allow for the integration of multiple training paradigms used by a single participant.

Interventions

  • Combination product Epidural stimulation + Stand Training
    Participants may use a standing apparatus or a less assistive device such as walker or cane. In case of upper limbs and trunk control insufficient for safely using the standing apparatus, participants will be placed on the treadmill, and a body weight support system. In this case, the level of body weight support will be continuously reduced as the individuals increase their ability to bear weight. A trainer positioned behind the participant will aid in pelvis and trunk stabilization. Trainer(s)
  • Combination product Epidural stimulation + Step Training
    Participants may be placed on the treadmill in an upright position and suspended in a harness. All trainers are careful to provide manual assistance only when needed. A trainer positioned behind the research participant will aid in pelvis and trunk stabilization, as well as appropriate weight shifting and hip rotation during the step cycle. Trainers positioned at each limb will provide manual assistance to promote knee extension and knee flexion and toe clearance. Research participants will step
  • Combination product Epidural stimulation + Bladder Capacity Training
    We will initially conduct daily training for capacity in a supervised on-site lab setting. Optimal configurations will be used. The storage phase configuration will be used until the time for voiding/catheterization. The training procedure will be repeated for up to 8 hours daily on-site until three consecutive stable days of maintaining a consistent capacity values are achieved and deemed safe. In the home setting, participants will record blood pressure values, voided and residual volumes. Par
  • Combination product Epidural stimulation + Bladder Voiding Efficiency Training
    We will conduct training for voiding efficiency in a supervised on-site lab setting while the participant continues his/her training for capacity. Voiding without catheterization will be attempted. The training procedure will be repeated for up to 8 hours on-site until three stable days of maintaining a consistent voiding efficiency are achieved and deemed safe. The participant will be sent home for one day to perform the stimulation at home. In the home setting, participants will record blood p

Primary outcome measures

  • Ambulation [Time frame: 80 sessions, approximately 3 months]
  • Bladder storage/voiding [Time frame: 80 sessions, approximately 3 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years of age
  • non-progressive SCI
  • stable medical condition
  • Inability to stand and step independently
  • unable to voluntarily move all individual joints of the legs
  • no current anti-spasticity medication regimen
  • must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
  • Bladder dysfunction as a result of SCI
  • SCI between T1 and T10
  • no greater than 1 year post injury

Exclusion criteria

  • ventilator dependent
  • untreated painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, fracture or pressure sore
  • untreated psychiatric disorder or ongoing drug abuse
  • cardiovascular, respiratory, bladder, or renal disease unrelated to SCI
  • pregnant at the time of enrollment or planning to become pregnant during the time course of the study.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Kessler Foundation - Center for Spinal Stimulation — West Orange

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04879862 · 17-1024 MC-PP-3 · 1UH3NS116238

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗