Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT04797520

Diagnostic Accuracy of Core Stethoscope Auscultation vs. Point of Care Ultrasound in Placement of Endotracheal Tube

No phase Interventional Intubation Complication

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Eko CORE Stethoscope, Point of care ultrasound.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Intubation Complication. Basic parameters: up to 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Assessing Diagnostic Accuracy of Core Stethoscope Auscultation vs. Point of Care Ultrasound in Localizing Correct Placement of Endotracheal Tube

Overview

Misplacement of endotracheal tube (ETT) can have devastating complications for patients, some of which include respiratory failure, atelectasis, and pneumothorax. There are a number of ways to verify the correct placement of ETT, with the stethoscope auscultation being commonly used despite its low accuracy (60-65%) in distinguishing tracheal from bronchial intubation (4-6). The gold standard techniques include Chest X Ray or fiberoptic bronchoscope (7-8), with a recent study showing point-of-care ultrasound. However, these techniques are expensive, time-consuming, often not readily available and require substantial training before users can reliably utilize them. Given intubation is often performed in urgent clinical settings, a technique that can reliably yet efficiently localize ETT would be beneficial. Tele-auscultation system via Core stethoscope (Eko, Berkeley, CA) has been shown to be effective in identifying pathologic heart murmur (10) yet its potential use in guiding the correct placement of ETT has not been explored. We set out to study the suitability of Core stethoscope in detecting the correct placement of ETT.

Interventions

  • Device Eko CORE Stethoscope
    Eko CORE stethoscope will be used as a visual and auditory means of confirming placement of ETT
  • Device Point of care ultrasound
    Point of care ultrasound will be used as a means of confirming placement of ETT. This is the "gold standard" used in standard of care

Primary outcome measures

  • Localization of endotracheal tube placement by the presence/absence of lung pleural linings movement by ultrasound [Time frame: During assessment with point of care ultrasound (10min)]
  • Localization of endotracheal tube placement by the presence/absence of breath sounds detected by Core-Eko augmented stethoscope [Time frame: During assessment with Core-Eko augmented stethoscope auscultation (5min)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Any patients under the age of 18
  • Surgery requiring an ETT
  • Consent/parental consent to

Exclusion criteria

  • Possible difficult airway
  • Significant lung pathology
  • with any major cardiac anomaly

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Lucille Packard Children's Hospital — Palo Alto

Publications

  • Kollef MH, Legare EJ, Damiano M. Endotracheal tube misplacement: incidence, risk factors, and impact of a quality improvement program. South Med J. 1994 Feb;87(2):248-54. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199402000-00020. PMID 8115893
  • Kerrey BT, Rinderknecht AS, Geis GL, Nigrovic LE, Mittiga MR. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;60(3):251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Mar 15. PMID 22424653
  • Jemmett ME, Kendal KM, Fourre MW, Burton JH. Unrecognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes in a mixed urban to rural emergency medical services setting. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Sep;10(9):961-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00652.x. PMID 12957980
  • Bissinger U, Lenz G, Kuhn W. Unrecognized endobronchial intubation of emergency patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Aug;18(8):853-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80211-2. PMID 2757282
  • Geisser W, Maybauer DM, Wolff H, Pfenninger E, Maybauer MO. Radiological validation of tracheal tube insertion depth in out-of-hospital and in-hospital emergency patients. Anaesthesia. 2009 Sep;64(9):973-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06007.x. PMID 19686482
  • Brunel W, Coleman DL, Schwartz DE, Peper E, Cohen NH. Assessment of routine chest roentgenograms and the physical examination to confirm endotracheal tube position. Chest. 1989 Nov;96(5):1043-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.5.1043. PMID 2509149
  • Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Hauser GJ, Pollack MM, Bulas DI, Guion CJ, Fearon T. Efficacy of chest radiography in pediatric intensive care. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Mar;152(3):575-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.152.3.575. PMID 2783812
  • Dietrich KA, Strauss RH, Cabalka AK, Zimmerman JJ, Scanlan KA. Use of flexible fiberoptic endoscopy for determination of endotracheal tube position in the pediatric patient. Crit Care Med. 1988 Sep;16(9):884-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198809000-00013. PMID 3402233

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04797520 · 60429

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗