Flat Dose vs. Weight-based IP Chemotherapy for CRS/HIPEC
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Mitomycin C, flat dose 40 mg, Mitomycin C, weight-based dose 12.5 mg/m2.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Flat Dose vs. Weight-based Dose of Intra-peritoneal (IP) Chemotherapy for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancy
Overview
Peritoneal carcinomatosis from advanced gastro-intestinal malignancy has historically been associated with poor overall survival (≤ 12 months) with few treatment options. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), which involves removal of all macroscopic tumor nodules, combined with direct administration of heated intra-peritoneal (IP) chemotherapy (HIPEC) to the affected peritoneal surfaces, has been shown to be an effective treatment option that extends overall survival among certain cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis. IP chemotherapy allows delivery of a high dose of cytostatic drug directly onto the peritoneal surfaces at risk for microscopic residual disease while systemic exposure remains limited. Additionally, hyperthermia is known to enhance the cytotoxicity of several agents (including Mitomycin C) and improves the depth of peritoneal penetration. This trial will be a randomized phase 2 comparison of flat dose versus weight-based dose Mitomycin C. The hypothesis of this study is that HIPEC weight-based dosing may result in similarly effective peritoneal Mitomycin C concentrations with less systemic absorption and potential systemic toxicity, compared with the HIPEC flat dosing approach in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
Interventions
- Drug Mitomycin C, flat dose 40 mg
Mitomycin C will be delivered as heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two flat doses. Dose 1 will be 30mg at minute 0 and dose 2 will be 10 mg at minute 45. - Drug Mitomycin C, weight-based dose 12.5 mg/m2
Mitomycin C will be delivered as heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two weight-based doses of 9.5 mg/m2 at minute 0 and 3 mg/m2 at minute 45.
Primary outcome measures
- Area Under the Curve (AUC) - Pharmacokinetics [Time frame: Approximately 20 hours]
- Drug Clearance (CL) - Pharmacokinetics [Time frame: Approximately 20 hours]
- Drug Half-Life (T1/2) - Pharmacokinetics [Time frame: Approximately 20 hours]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients diagnosed with one of the following: low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, pseudomyxoma peritonei, appendiceal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis, colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis
- ECOG performance status < 3
- Candidate for grossly complete cytoreductive surgery
- Life expectancy greater than 3 months
- Adequate organ and marrow function
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion criteria
- Any extra-abdominal metastases
- Untreated lung metastases
- Liver metastases not amenable to resection or ablation
- Known brain metastases
- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to entering the study
- Presence of residual significant adverse events attributed to prior cancer treatment
- Currently receiving any other investigational therapeutic agents
- History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to Mitomycin C.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Uncontrolled ongoing illness
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 2 centers
- University of Kentucky — Lexington
- University of Vermont Medical Center — Burlington
Publications
- McDonald HG, Cassim EB, Harper MM, Burke EE, Marcinkowski EF, Cavnar MJ, Pandalai PK, Kim J. The Development of Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials in Surgical Oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2023 Jan;32(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Nov 3. PMID 36410913
Identifiers
NCT: NCT04779554 · MCC-20-GI-115