Menu
Recruiting NCT04776473

Treatment of Intra-articular Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle

No phase Interventional Intra-articular Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Open treatment, Closed treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Intra-articular Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle. Basic parameters: 18 years — 84 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Open Versus Closed Treatment of Intra-articular Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Intra-articular fractures of the mandibular condyle ((IAFC) are usually treated by means of physical therapy with or without transient maxillo-mandibular fixation (conservative or closed treatment). However, this can lead to incomplete manducatory function recovery due to limited mandibular mobility. During the last 15 years, a growing interest has emerged for open (surgical) treatment of these fractures. Although there is more and more evidence suggesting that the open treatment may be the treatment of choice for selected cases of subcondylar fractures, the best option remains controversial for high condylar fractures. The primary objective of the trial is to compare mandibular mobility at 3 months post-treatment between open (surgical) and closed (conservative) treatment of intra-articular fracture (high fracture) of the mandibular condyle. This study is an open multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms. Eligible patients will be randomized 1 :1 between open and closed-treatment group.

Detailed description

The mandibular condyle is one of the most frequent locations of facial fractures. It can lead to severe functional impairment if the occlusion is not properly restored and the mandibular mobility not recovered totally or within an acceptable range. Most frequent sequels of these fractures include limitation of mandibular movements resulting in limited mouth opening, occlusal disturbance causing chewing malfunction, chronic pain, chronic temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) disorder and facial asymmetry. The risk of permanent limited mouth opening is even higher when the fracture is located inside the TMJ. Although the superiority of surgical treatment is now widely accepted for low-level fractures of the condylar unit (i.e., extra-articular fractures) the treatment of fractures involving the TMJ in adult patients is still controversial.

Treatment principles in these fractures can be ranked in two groups: closed and open treatments. Closed treatment - also called closed reduction or conservative treatment - consists in prolonged physical therapy frequently associated with transient maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF). Open treatment consists in open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture (ORIF).

No randomized controlled trial has ever evaluated the superiority of open versus closed treatment, and treatment strategy for IAFC remains a matter of ongoing debate.

The primary objective of this trial is to compare mandibular mobility at 3 months post-treatment between open (surgical) and closed (conservative) treatment of intra-articular fracture (high fracture) of the mandibular condyle.

The secondary objectives are to compare between open (surgical) and closed (conservative) treatments:

At 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment:

* maximal mouth opening (in mm) * maximal mandibular protrusion (in mm), * maximal lateral excursion (in mm), * lateral deviation of the mandible during mouth opening * occlusal disturbance evaluated by both the patient and the surgeon * pain using a visual analog scale * subjective functional impairment as assessed by the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire

Overall:

* duration of sick leave * time to normal activity recovery (social activities, eating, sports) We will also evaluate compliance with the intervention. This trial is an open multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms. Eligible patients will be randomized 1 :1 between open and closed-treatment group.

Interventions

  • Procedure Open treatment
    Open (i.e. surgical) treatment will be performed following the usual practice of the including centre adopting a pragmatic approach.
  • Other Closed treatment
    Closed (i.e. conservative) treatment will be performed following the usual practice of the including centre adopting a pragmatic approach.

Primary outcome measures

  • Maximal mouth opening (in mm) at 3 months [Time frame: 3 months (+/-10 days)]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Maximal mouth opening (in mm) [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Maximal mandibular protrusion (in mm) [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Maximal lateral excursion (in mm) [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Lateral deviation of the mandible during mouth opening [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Occlusal disturbance reported by the patient [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Occlusal disturbance evaluated by the surgeon [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Evaluation of pain using a visual analog scale [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Subjective functional impairment evaluated by the patient using the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) [Time frame: 3 weeks (+/- 7 days), 6 weeks (+/-7 days), 3 months (+/-10 days), 6 months (+/-20 days) and, 12 months (+/- 30 days) post-treatment]
  • Duration of sick leave [Time frame: From treatment until 12 months]
  • Time to normal activity recovery [Time frame: Every week from week 1 to 6, every 2 weeks from week 8 to 12, and every month from month 4 to 12]
  • Compliance with the intervention - Number of appointments with a physical therapist [Time frame: Every week from week 1 to 6, every 2 weeks from week 8 to 12, and every month from month 4 to 12]
  • Compliance with the intervention - Number of self-training sessions [Time frame: Every week from week 1 to 6, every 2 weeks from week 8 to 12, and every month from month 4 to 12]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (≥18 y-o) < 85 years
  • Displaced non-comminuted intra-articular fracture of the mandibular condyle (IAFC) as defined by a fracture line above a horizontal line tangent to the mandibular notch
  • Objectifiable induced malocclusion and/or ramus shortening ≥2 mm on CT-scan (a ramus shortening ≥2 mm on CT-scan is necessary in case of other associated mandibular or occluso-facial fractures)
  • Unilateral or bilateral fracture
  • Isolated or associated with other facial / extra-facial skeleton / dental / soft tissue lesions
  • Treatment within 14 days post trauma
  • Affiliation to a social security regime (excepted AME)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to surgical treatment (for any medical or anatomical reason, like comminuted fracture for instance)
  • Major teeth loss or edentulous patient (occlusion impossible to assess)
  • History of mandibular fracture
  • History of temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) disorder
  • Dentofacial dysmorphosis causing significant malocclusion
  • Predictable inability to comply with the follow-up
  • Unconsciousness / severe polytrauma
  • Participation in another interventional study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 7 centers
  • CHU Angers — Angers
  • Hôpital Annecy Genevois — Annecy
  • APHM - Hôpital de la Conception — Marseille
  • CHU de Nantes — Nantes
  • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière — Paris
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg — Strasbourg
  • CHU Purpan - Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet — Toulouse

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04776473 · APHP180606 · 2019-A00252-55

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗