Menu
Recruiting NCT04741711

AMBulatory UltraSound for Heart Failure Management

No phase Interventional Heart Failure

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: An ultrasound (lung and inferior vena cava) will be performed and the heart failure treatments will be guided by the results of the lung ultrasound and the evaluation of the inferior vena cava., Usual care without ultrasound guidance.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Heart Failure. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Impact of Ultrasound-guided Therapeutic Management of Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure : An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

AMBUSH study is a multicenter randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial (PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-point) type). The main objective of AMBUSH study is to assess the effect of therapeutic management guided by pulmonary ultrasound and the assessment of the inferior vena cava in patients with heart failure seen in an ambulatory (outpatient) setting on a mixed clinical-biological endpoint (including variations of natriuretic peptides - NtProBNP) at 30 days.

Detailed description

Secondary objectives are:

A. To assess the effect of therapeutic management guided by pulmonary ultrasound and inferior vena cava assessment on the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure at 30 days.

B. Describe the proportion of ultrasound congestion (pulmonary and inferior vena cava data) in patients free from clinical congestion at baseline in the intervention group and in all patients at D30 visit.

C. Evaluate the association of ultrasound congestion (pulmonary and inferior vena cava assessment) with serum concentrations of natriuretic peptides at baseline and D30 visit.

D. Evaluate the association of variations in ultrasound congestion (pulmonary and evaluation of the inferior vena cava) and variations in natriuretic peptides between baseline and D30 visit.

E. Compare the proportion of ultrasound and clinical congestion in patients in the intervention group and in the control group at baseline and on D30 visit.

Interventions

  • Procedure An ultrasound (lung and inferior vena cava) will be performed and the heart failure treatments will be guided by the results of the lung ultrasound and the evaluation of the inferior vena cava.
    An ultrasound (lung and inferior vena cava) will be performed and the heart failure treatments will be guided by the results of the lung ultrasound and the evaluation of the inferior vena cava. The choice of congestion treatment modalities to be implemented is left to the investigators' discretion, in accordance with European practice guidelines.
  • Procedure Usual care without ultrasound guidance
    Usual care (i.e. without ultrasound guidance)

Primary outcome measures

  • Death within 30 days (composite endpoint) [Time frame: Within 30 days]
  • Hospitalization for heart failure within 30 days (composite endpoint) [Time frame: Within 30 days]
  • Changes in N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NtProBNP) between randomization and D30 (composite endpoint) [Time frame: Between randomization and Day 30]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Cardiovascular death [Time frame: Within 30 days]
  • Ultrasound pulmonary congestion defined ≥3 B-lines on two intercostal spaces bilaterally (8-point method) and systemic congestion defined as an inferior vena cava diameter 21 mm or greater and/or a low variation during the respiratory cycle [Time frame: At baseline in the intervention group and in all patients at Day 30 post inclusion]
  • Circulating levels of natriuretic peptides (NtProBNP) [Time frame: At baseline and Day 30]
  • Changes in natriuretic peptides (NtProBNP) [Time frame: Between baseline and Day 30.]
  • Ultrasound congestion defined as in B / and clinical congestion evaluated according to the EVEREST and ASCEND scores [Time frame: At baseline in the intervention group and in all patients at the Day 30.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female aged 18 and over
  • Heart failure (regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction)
  • Diagnosis of heart failure established more than 3 months ago
  • Absence of significant clinical signs of congestion on clinical examination (absence of crackles and lower limbs oedema greater than perimalleolar oedema)
  • Affiliation to social security
  • Receiving complete information about research organization and signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Natriuretic peptides result, carried out during the previous 30 days, available at the inclusion consultation
  • Pulmonary or pleural pathology preventing reliable acquisition of lung ultrasound images: severe emphysema, chronic pleurisy, pulmonary fibrosis.
  • Suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis or proven amyloidosis,
  • Patient with severe primary heart valve disease
  • Pregnant woman, parturient or nursing mother
  • Adult person subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)
  • Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision,
  • Person subject to psychiatric care pursuant to Articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1 of the Public Health Code.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 5 centers
  • CHU de Besançon — Besançon
  • CH de Mulhouse — Mulhouse
  • CHRU de Reims — Reims
  • CHR de Metz — Thionville
  • CHRU de Nancy — Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04741711 · 2019PI094

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗