Menu
Recruiting NCT04738708

Telegenetics or In-Person Genetic Counselling

Observational Genetic Counselling

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Patients referred to CGS at NCCS for HBOC or Lynch syndrome pre-test genetic counselling..
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Genetic Counselling. Basic parameters: from 21 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Singapore
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Telegenetics or In-Person Genetic Counselling: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost

Overview

This study aims to compare clinical outcomes (informed choice and genetic counselling outcomes) and cost (provider and patient time, travel, and telehealth platform) between telegenetics and in-person genetic counselling.

Detailed description

This study will compare the patient-reported outcomes of telegenetics with in-person consultations for participants considering germline testing for HBOC or Lynch syndrome. It will clarify if telegenetics is a feasible and non-inferior alternative to in-person cancer genetic counselling. Participant responses are important stakeholder views to guide the design of telegenetics to become a mainstream service delivery model welcomed by patients.

It aims to recruit 150 prospective consecutive patients attending genetic counselling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and Lynch Syndrome in Clinical Genetic Services (CGS) at National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS).

Upon completion of the genetic consultation appointments, patients will be completing a series of questions evaluating cognitive and psychosocial outcomes either via hardcopy in-person or online internet-facing questionnaire.

Interventions

  • Other Patients referred to CGS at NCCS for HBOC or Lynch syndrome pre-test genetic counselling.
    Patients are given a series of questions evaluating cognitive and psychosocial outcomes, either via hardcopy in-person or online internet-facing questionnaire.

Primary outcome measures

  • Genomics Outcome Scale [Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after consultation]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Adapted Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC) for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and Lynch [Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after consultation]
  • Genetic Counselling Satisfaction Scale [Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after consultation]
  • Telehealth Patient Survey [Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after consultation]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 21 years old.
  • Patients referred to CGS at NCCS for HBOC or Lynch syndrome pre-test genetic counselling.
  • Able to read and understand the English Language.
  • Able to consent and agree to be randomized to either telegenetics or in-person genetic counselling.

Exclusion criteria

  • Under the age of 21 years old.
  • Patients who require genetic results urgently.
  • Cognitive difficulty/ impairment or current psychiatric or physical illness (visual/ hearing/ neurological) which impairs sound judgement and accurate reporting of medical history over video consultation.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Singapore · 1 center
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore — Singapore

Publications

  • Lee AKF, Cho RHW, Lau EHL, Cheng HK, Wong EWY, Ku PKM, Chan JYK, Yeung ZWC. Mitigation of head and neck cancer service disruption during COVID-19 in Hong Kong through telehealth and multi-institutional collaboration. Head Neck. 2020 Jul;42(7):1454-1459. doi: 10.1002/hed.26226. Epub 2020 May 7. PMID 32357277
  • Lonergan PE, Washington Iii SL, Branagan L, Gleason N, Pruthi RS, Carroll PR, Odisho AY. Rapid Utilization of Telehealth in a Comprehensive Cancer Center as a Response to COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e19322. doi: 10.2196/19322. PMID 32568721
  • Pramesh CS, Badwe RA. Cancer Management in India during Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):e61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2011595. Epub 2020 Apr 28. No abstract available. PMID 32343498
  • van de Haar J, Hoes LR, Coles CE, Seamon K, Frohling S, Jager D, Valenza F, de Braud F, De Petris L, Bergh J, Ernberg I, Besse B, Barlesi F, Garralda E, Piris-Gimenez A, Baumann M, Apolone G, Soria JC, Tabernero J, Caldas C, Voest EE. Caring for patients with cancer in the COVID-19 era. Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):665-671. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0874-8. Epub 2020 Apr 16. PMID 32405058
  • Wong ZW, Cross HL. Telehealth in cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med J Aust. 2020 Sep;213(5):237-237.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50740. Epub 2020 Aug 16. No abstract available. PMID 32803783
  • Dickinson R, Hall S, Sinclair JE, Bond C, Murchie P. Using technology to deliver cancer follow-up: a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2014 May 3;14:311. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-311. PMID 24885758
  • Finnane A, Dallest K, Janda M, Soyer HP. Teledermatology for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;153(3):319-327. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4361. PMID 27926766
  • Kubendran S, Sivamurthy S, Schaefer GB. A novel approach in pediatric telegenetic services: geneticist, pediatrician and genetic counselor team. Genet Med. 2017 Nov;19(11):1260-1267. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.45. Epub 2017 Apr 27. PMID 28471436

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04738708 · 002.1

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗