Menu
Recruiting NCT04731857

Diagnostic Value of Exome/ Genome Sequencing, Conventional Methods in Rare Diseases and Familial Tumor Syndromes

Observational Rare Diseases Genetic Predisposition

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Retrospective data analysis.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Rare Diseases, Genetic Predisposition. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Germany
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Diagnostic Value of Exome and Genome Sequencing as Well as Conventional Methods in Rare Diseases and Familial Tumor Syndromes

Overview

For the retrospective data analysis, patients with genetic diseases of any age and, if available, other family members, for whom genetic analyzes were carried out between 10/2016 and 12/2020, should be included. This equates to approximately 13,000 records, minus combined analyzes in the same patient, an estimated 12,000 individuals.

Detailed description

The methodological developments of the last few years allow the broad use of next-generation-sequencing (NGS) -based methods in the routine molecular genetic diagnosis of genetic diseases.The aim of the retrospective data analysis is to create a solid data basis for further discussion regarding the development and mapping of diagnostic algorithms and subsequent supply routes. For the genome data, this evaluation is to be expanded to include the evaluation of the Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) in the sense of an additional finding.

Interventions

  • Genetic Retrospective data analysis
    The outlined evaluation contributes to the improvement of molecular genetic diagnostics in patient care - for example when which diagnostics can be sensibly recommended for patients with which indications or not. Diagnostic gaps can be systematically evaluated and specifically addressed in the future. This potentially affects every examination assignment for current and future patients. In addition, the evaluation of the PRSs for example, can contribute significantly to the timely introduction t

Primary outcome measures

  • Diagnosis [Time frame: Day 1]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with genetic disease or
  • Family members
  • Genetic analysis between 10/2016 and 12/2020 at the Institute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics at the University Hospital Tübingen

Exclusion criteria

\- None

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Germany · 1 center
  • University Hospital Tübingen — Tübingen

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04731857 · EXGEFATU

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗