Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion

Official title

A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Performance of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers (DBX or Grafton) Mixed With Local Autograft in Patients Undergoing One to Two-Level Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion (PLF)

Overview

This is a phase IV post-marketing study for MagnetOs Easypack Putty. MagnetOs Easypack Putty is a synthetic bone graft extender product that is routinely used by surgeons as a treatment for patients with degenerative disc disease or spinal trauma undergoing spinal fusion surgery. In this study, MagnetOs Easypack Putty will be used according to the latest U.S. Instructions For Use, standalone in the posterolateral spine.

Detailed description

In this study, following a screening period of a maximum of 30 days, 60 patients will undergo up to two-level instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) procedure. Prior to surgery, each patient will be randomized to receive MagnetOs Easypack Putty standalone on the assigned side of the spine and Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers mixed with local autograft bone on the other at the diseased levels. They will be followed up at discharge, Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. An interim analysis will be performed once 30 patients have completed their Month 6 visit and have measurements for the endpoints available to measure effectiveness. The primary endpoint will be analyzed at Month 12.

In this study, MagnetOs Easypack Putty will be applied according to the latest Instructions for Use approved in the United States. Specifically, MagnetOs Easypack Putty will be used standalone in patients up to two-level degenerative disc disease with segmental mechanical spinal instability requiring treatment with an instrumented posterolateral spine fusion procedure. The fusion procedure (PLF) will be left to the surgeon's discretion.

Radiographs will be obtained at Screening, Discharge, Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12. CT scans will only be obtained at Month 6 and Month 12.

Interventions

• Device MagnetOs Easypack Putty
  MagnetOs Easypack Putty used standalone in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 5cc-15c per spine level at the randomized assigned side.
• Device Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers mixed with local autograft bone
  Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers (DBX or Grafton) mixed in a 1:1 vol% with local autologous bone graft used in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 5cc-15cc per level mixed with bone marrow aspirate/blood per spine level at the contralateral side.

Primary outcome measures

• Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan [Time frame: Month 12]

Secondary outcome measures (6)

• Radiographic Fusion by Plain Radiographs [Time frame: Month 6, Month 12]
• Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan [Time frame: Month 6]
• Functional Outcome by Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire [Time frame: Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12]
• Back and Leg Pain by Visual Analog Pain Scale Questionnaire [Time frame: Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12]
• Neurologic Status by Physical Exam [Time frame: Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12]
• Success Rate [Time frame: Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Patient is able to read/be read, understand, and provide written informed consent and has signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent.
• Male or female patient ≥ 18 years old.
• Patients with segmental mechanical spinal instability requiring arthrodesis surgery.

Instability can be either caused by degenerative disc disease or by traumatic injury to the spinal column. Patient requiring a maximum of two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar/thoraco-lumbar fusion (T11 - S1) will be enrolled. Mechanical instability is defined by the presence of one or more of the following:

• instability (angulation ≥ 5 degrees or translation ≥ 3 mm on flexion/extension radiographs),
• decreased disc height by > 2 mm, but dependent upon the spinal level
• Grade II or more listhesis
• TLICS equal or greater than 5
• Unstable burst fracture

• Failed conservative treatment (physical therapy, bed rest, medications, spinal injections, manipulations, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) for a minimum period of 3 months prior to study enrollment (if the patient undergoes elective surgery). Patients who have spinal instability (as defined above in inclusion criteria number three), caused by acute trauma requiring urgent surgical treatment are excluded from this criterion.

Exclusion criteria

• Requires > two-level fusion or expected to need secondary intervention within one year following surgery.
• Had prior PLF fusion or attempted PLF fusion at the involved levels.
• Had previous decompression at the involved levels.
• Women who are or intend to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
• To treat conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable.
• In conditions where the surgical site may be subjected to excessive impact or stresses, including those beyond the load strength of fixation hardware (e.g. defect site stabilization is not possible).
• In case of significant vascular impairment proximal to the graft site.
• In case of severe metabolic or systemic bone disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta, history of or active Pott's disease, stage >4 renal disease or Paget's Disease) that affect bone or wound healing.
• In case of acute and chronic infections in the operated area (soft tissue infections; inflammation, bacterial bone diseases; osteomyelitis).
• When intraoperative soft tissue coverage is not planned or possible.
• Receiving treatment with medication interfering with calcium metabolism.
• Has degenerative disc disease (DDD) related to a benign or malignant tumor.
• Has history or presence of active malignancy.
• Has known substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, or a condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may influence the healing or ability to comply with protocol requirements.
• Is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition.
• Has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to surgery for study devices.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation

Randomized

Model

Parallel assignment

Masking

Open label

Primary purpose

Treatment

Study locations

United States · 6 centers

• The Regents of the University of California- Irvine Campus — Irvine
• Corewell Health — Grand Rapids
• The Washington University — St Louis
• Rothman Orthopaedic Institute — Philadelphia
• Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance — Nashville
• University of Washington — Seattle

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04679844 · MAG-920-023

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗