EUS Guided Portal-systemic Pressure Gradient Measurement

Official title

EUS Guided Portal-systemic Pressure Gradient Measurement in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis.

Overview

Portal hypertension is characterised by an increased portal pressure gradient (PPG), that is the difference in pressure between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava (IVC). Portal hypertension is a consequence of cirrhosis resulting from chronic hepatitis. Patients with portal hypertension are at risk of developing complications including oesophageal or gastric varices, variceal bleeding, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy and mortality. Albeit its clinical significance, direct measurement of portal venous pressure to document portal hypertension has traditionally been difficult. The portal vein pressure can be measured by transhepatic or transvenous methods but the procedure carries a risk of intra-peritoneal bleeding. Furthermore, the IVC pressure measurement requires further transjugular catheterisation. Hence, the technique is rarely used. Currently, the gold standard in measurement of portal hypertension is via measurement hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The HVPG has been shown to correlate with risk of clinical decompensation, development of varices, hepatocellular carcinoma, variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and mortality. Nevertheless, the technique has a low acceptance rate amongst patients and it may not be available even in tertiary medical centres. Recently, the use of EUS-guided approach for measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPGM) has been shown to be feasible. The technical success rate was 100% and no adverse events were reported. Measurements obtained with the EUS approach was shown to correlate excellently with clinical parameters of portal hypertension including presence of varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, the procedure could be performed at the same time of screening oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), that is frequently required for variceal screening in this group of patients. Hence, the aim of the current study is to investigate the feasibility of EUS-PPGM and correlate the risk of developing complications with the PPGM in patients that are suffering from chronic hepatitis.

Detailed description

Currently, the gold standard in measurement of portal hypertension is via measurement hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The HVPG has been shown to correlate with risk of clinical decompensation, development of varices, hepatocellular carcinoma, variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and mortality. The technique involves ultrasound guided puncture of the internal jugular vein, followed by passage of a balloon catheter from through the right atrium, IVC and right hepatic vein. The free hepatic vein venous pressure is then measured followed by the wedge balloon venous pressure. The HVPG is then calculated by subtracting the free hepatic venous pressure from the wedge balloon venous pressure. When HVPG is \>10mmHg, the risk of developing varices is increased. If \>12mmHg, then risk of variceal bleeding is increased. Mortality risk is increased when HVPG is \>16-20mmHg. Nevertheless, the technique is technically difficult and it may not be available even in tertiary medical centres \[8\]. Furthermore, it requires the use of ionic contrast and also has a low acceptance rate amongst patients.

The aim of the current study is to investigate the feasibility of EUS-PPGM using the novel device and correlate the risk of developing complications with the PPGM in patients that are suffering from chronic hepatitis.

Recently, the use of EUS-guided approach for measurement of portal pressure gradient (PPGM) has been shown to be feasible. PPGM by the EUS approach was found to have excellent accuracy and strong correlation with pressure values obtained by the criterion standard transjugular wedged and free hepatic venous pressure measurements by interventional radiology in an animal model. Furthermore, in a pilot study involving 29 patients. The technical success rate was 100% and no adverse events were reported. Measurements obtained with the EUS approach was shown to correlate excellently with clinical parameters of portal hypertension including presence of varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy and thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, the procedure could be performed at the same time of screening oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), that is frequently required for variceal screening in this group of patients. However, whether the technique could reproduce results similar to HVPG in humans is uncertain.

Interventions

• Device EUS-portal pressure gradient measurement (PPGM)
  EUS-guided PPGM is performed under conscious sedation. An OGD would be performed to evaluate for findings consistent with portal hypertension such as varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy. The linear array echoendoscope is passed from the mouth into the stomach and duodenum, as with a standard exam. Under endoscopic ultrasound guidance, a 25 gauge EUS needle (Echotip, Cook Medical, USA) primed with heparin 100 USP/ml is then placed across the stomach or duodenal wall and through the liver

Primary outcome measures

• Technical success [Time frame: 30 days]

Secondary outcome measures (1)

• Adverse events [Time frame: 30 day]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Suffering from chronic hepatitis induced cirrhosis
• Informed consent available

Exclusion criteria

• Medical
• Child-Pugh Class C
• Uncorrected platelet count <50,000
• INR > 1.5 (natural)
• Anatomical
• Previous transjugular intrahepatic or surgical portosystemic shunt
• Portal vein thrombosis
• Anatomic alterations of the hepatic vasculature that prevent access to the portal vein or intrahepatic portion of the hepatic veins (identified at screening and/or during the endoscopic procedure).
• Previous history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis within the previous three months
• Portopulmonary hypertension
• Cardiac decompensation
• Endoscopically Confirmed Exclusion Criteria
• Evidence of active GI bleeding (identified at screening and/or during the endoscopic procedure)
• If the volume of ascites in the path of the needle prevents apposition of the gastrointestinal tract and liver.
• Presence of gastric or duodenal ulcers, dieulafoy's lesion or cancers.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation

N/A

Model

Single group

Masking

Open label

Primary purpose

Diagnostic

Study locations

China · 1 center

• Chinese University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong

Publications

• Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T, Lee J, Hu KQ, McLaren CE, Chen WP, Chang KJ. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Sep 29. PMID 27693644
• Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T, Chang KJ. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a novel 25-gauge needle device versus standard transjugular approach: a comparison animal study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84(2):358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.032. Epub 2016 Mar 3. PMID 26945557

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04633356 · 2017.519

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗